The Project Gutenberg EBook of A Brief Account of Radio-activity, by 
Francis Preston Venable

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org


Title: A Brief Account of Radio-activity

Author: Francis Preston Venable

Release Date: May 9, 2010 [EBook #32307]

Language: English

Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF RADIO-ACTIVITY ***




Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
generously made available by The Internet Archive/American
Libraries.)

A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF
RADIO-ACTIVITY

BY

FRANCIS P. VENABLE, Ph.D., D.Sc., LL.D.

PROFESSOR OF CHEMISTRY, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
AUTHOR OF
"A SHORT HISTORY OF CHEMISTRY,"
"PERIODIC LAW," ETC.

D. C. HEATH & CO., PUBLISHERS
BOSTON     NEW YORK     CHICAGO

Copyright, 1917,
By D. C. Heath & Co.

IA7

[Pg iii]

PREFACE

I have gathered the material for this little book because I have found it a necessary filling out of the course for my class in general chemistry. Such a course dealing with the composition and structure of matter is left unfinished and in the air, as it were, unless the marvellous facts and deductions from the study of radio-activity are presented and discussed. The usual page or two given in the present text-books are too condensed in their treatment to afford any intelligent grasp of the subject, so I have put in book form the lectures which I have hitherto felt forced to give.

Perhaps the book may prove useful also to busy men in other branches of science who wish to know something of radio-activity and have scant leisure in which to read the larger treatises.

It is needless to say that there is nothing original in the book unless it be in part the grouping of facts and order of their treatment. I have made free use of the writings of Rutherford, Soddy, and J. J. Thomson, and would here express my debt to them—just a part of that indebtedness which we all feel to these masters. I wish also to acknowledge my obligations to Professor Bertram B. Boltwood for his helpful suggestions in connection with this work. [Pg iv]

[Pg v]

CONTENTS

[Pg vii]

A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF
RADIO-ACTIVITY

[Pg viii]

[Pg 1]

A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF
RADIO-ACTIVITY

CHAPTER I

DISCOVERY OF RADIO-ACTIVITY

The object of this brief treatise is to give a simple account of the development of our knowledge of radio-activity and its bearing on chemical and physical science. Mathematical processes will be omitted, as it is sufficient to give the assured results from calculations which are likely to be beyond the training of the reader. Experimental evidence will be given in detail wherever it is fundamental and necessary to a confident grasp of some of the marvelous deductions in this new branch of science. Theories cannot be avoided, but the facts remain while theories grow old and are discarded for others more in accord with the facts.

As so often happens in the history of science, the opening up of this new field with its fascinating disclosures was due to an investigation undertaken for another purpose but painstakingly carried out with a mind open to the truth wherever it might lead.

[Pg 2] In 1895, Röntgen modestly announced his discovery of the X rays. This attracted immediate and intense interest. Among those who undertook to follow up these phenomena was Becquerel, who, because of the apparent connection with phosphorescence, tried the action of a number of phosphorescent substances upon the photographic plate, the most striking characteristic of the X rays being their effect upon such sensitive plates. In these experiments he obtained no results until he tried salts of uranium, recalling previous observations of his as to their phosphorescence. Distinct action was noted. Furthermore, he proved that this had no connection with the phenomenon of phosphorescence, as both uranic and uranous salts were active and the latter show no phosphorescence. Becquerel announced his discoveries in 1896 and this was the beginning of the new science of radio-activity.

The rays given off by uranium and its salts were found to differ from the X rays. They showed no appreciable variation in intensity, no previous exposure of the substance to light was necessary, and neither changes of temperature nor any other physical or chemical agency affected them.

At first uranium and its compounds were the only known source of these new radiations, but many other substances were examined and two years later thorium and its compounds were added to the list. In general the discharging action seemed about the same. Other [Pg 3] elements and ordinary substances show a minute activity. Only potassium and rubidium have a greater activity than this, and theirs is only about one-thousandth that of uranium.

In the examination of uranium and thorium compounds it was found that the activity was determined by the uranium and thorium present; it was proportto the amount ofional these elements present and independent of the nature of the other elements composing the compound. The conclusion was, therefore, that the activity was an inherent property of the atoms of uranium and thorium, that is, an atomic property. This was a long step forward and introduced into science the conception of a new property of matter, or at least of certain forms of matter.

In examining a large number of minerals containing uranium and thorium, Mme. Curie made the important observation that many of these were more active than the elements themselves. In measuring the activity she made use of the electrical method which will be described later. In the following table giving her results for uranium minerals the numbers under i give the maximum current in amperes. They serve simply for comparison.

[Pg 4] The last three are pure uranium and compounds of that element given for comparison with the first five, which are naturally occurring minerals. The last compound has the same composition as chalcolite and is simply the artificially prepared mineral. It has the activity which would be calculated from the proportion of uranium present, the copper and phosphoric acid contributing no activity.

Since the activity is not dependent upon the composition but upon the amount of uranium present, the activity in all of the minerals should be less than that of uranium. On the contrary, it is several times greater. Natural and artificial chalcolite also show a marked difference in favor of the former. The supposition was a natural one, therefore, that these minerals contained small quantities of an element, or elements, undetected by ordinary analysis and having a much greater activity than uranium. Similar results were obtained in the examination of thorium minerals and thorium salts.

Following up this supposition, M. and Mme. Curie set themselves the task of separating this unknown substance. Starting with pitchblende, a systematic chemical examination was made. This is an exceedingly complex mineral, containing [Pg 5] many elements. The processes were laborious and demanded much time and minute care. They need not be described here. It is sufficient to say that along with bismuth a very active substance was separated, to which Mme. Curie gave the name of polonium for Poland, her native land. Its complete isolation is very difficult and sufficient quantities of the pure substance have not been obtained to determine its atomic weight and other properties, but some of the lines of its spectrum have been determined. Chemically it is very closely analogous to bismuth.

In a similar manner a barium precipitate was obtained from pitchblende which contained a highly active substance. The pure chloride of this body and barium can be prepared together and then separated by fractional crystallization. To the new body thus found the name of radium was given. It is similar in chemical properties to barium. Its atomic weight has been determined by several careful investigators and is accepted as 226. Its spectrum has been mapped and its general properties are known. It is a silvery white, oxidizable metal. In one ton of pitchblende about 0.2 gram of radium is present; this is about 5000 times greater than the amount of polonium present. The activity of the products was depended upon as the guide in these separations. The radium found is relatively enormously more active than the pitchblende or uranium.

In the above separations use was made of relationships [Pg 6] to bismuth and barium. Similarly, by taking advantage of chemical relationship to the iron group of elements, another body was partially separated by Debierne, to which he gave the name actinium. Boltwood discovered in uranium minerals the presence of a body which he named ionium, and which is so similar to thorium that it cannot be separated from it. It, however, far exceeds thorium in activity.

The lead which is present in uranium and thorium minerals—apparently in fairly definite ratio to the amount of uranium and thorium—is found, on separation and purification, to possess radio-active properties. This activity is due to the presence of a very small proportion of an active constituent called radio-lead, which has chemical properties identical with those of ordinary lead. The bulk of the lead obtained from radio-active minerals differs in atomic weight from ordinary lead and appears also to be different according to whether its source is a thorium or a uranium mineral.

A large number of other radio-active substances have been separated and some of their properties determined, but these were found by different means and will be noted in their proper place. They number in all more than thirty. The sources or parents of these are the original uranium or thorium, and the products form regular series with distinctive properties for each member.

[Pg 7]

CHAPTER II

PROPERTIES OF THE RADIATIONS

The activity of these radio-active bodies consists in the emission of certain radiations which may be separated into rays and studied through the phenomena which they cause.

One of these phenomena is the power of forming ions or carriers of electricity by the passage of the rays through a gas, thus ionizing the gas. The details of an experiment will serve to make the meaning of this ionization clear.

Fig. 1.—Ionization of Gases.

When this apparatus is set up a minute current will be observed without the introduction of any radio-active matter. This, as Rutherford says, has been found due mainly to a slight natural radio-activity of the matter composing the plates. If radio-active matter [Pg 8] is spread on plate A, which is connected with one pole of a grounded battery, and if plate B is connected with an electrometer which is also connected with the earth, a current is caused which increases rapidly with the difference of potential between the plates, then more slowly until a value is reached that changes only slightly with a larger increase in the voltage.

According to the theory of ionization, the radiation produces ions at a constant rate. The ions carrying a positive charge are attracted to plate B, while those negatively charged are attracted to plate A, thus causing a current. These ions will recombine and neutralize their charges if the opportunity is given. The number, therefore, increases to a point at which the ions produced balance the number recombining.

When an electric field is produced between the plates, the velocity of the ions between the plates is increased in proportion to the strength of the electric field. In a weak field the ions travel so slowly that most of them recombine on the way and consequently the observed current is very small. On increasing the voltage the speed of the ions is increased, fewer recombine, the current increases, and, when the condition for recombination is practically removed, it will have a maximum value. This maximum current is called the saturation current and the value of the potential difference required to give this maximum current is called the saturation P.D. or saturation voltage.

The picture, then, is this. The radiations separate [Pg 9] the components of the gas into ions, or carriers of electricity, half of which are charged negatively and half positively. In the electric field those negatively charged seek the positive plate and those positively charged seek the negative plate. If time is given, these ions meet and recombine, their charges are neutralized, and there is no current.

This theory of the ionization of gases has been most interestingly confirmed by direct experiment. For instance, the ions may form nuclei for the condensation of water, and in this way the existence of the separate ions in the gas may be shown and the number present actually counted.

When air saturated with water vapor is allowed to expand suddenly, the water present forms a mist of small globules. There are always small dust particles in air and around these as nuclei the drops are formed. These drops will settle and thus by repeated small expansions all dust nuclei may be removed and no mist or cloud will be formed by further expansions.

If now the radiation from a radio-active body be introduced into the condensation vessel, a new cloud is produced in which the water drops are finer and more numerous according to the intensity of the rays. On passing a strong beam of light through the condensation chamber, the drops can readily be seen. These drops form on the ions produced by the radiation.

If the condensation chamber has two parallel plates for the application of an electric field like that already [Pg 10] described, the ions will be carried at once to the electrodes and disappear. The rapidity of this action depends upon the strength of the electric field and experiment shows that the stronger the field the smaller the number of condensation drops formed. If there is no electric field, a cloud can be produced some time after the shutting off of the source of radiation, showing that time is required for the recombination of the ions.

If the drops are counted (there being special methods for this) and the total current carried accurately measured, then the charge carried by each ion may be calculated. This has been determined. The mass of an ion compared with the mass of the molecules of gas in which it was produced can also be approximately estimated. In the study of these ions the view has been held that the charged ion attracted to itself a cluster of molecules which surrounded the charged nucleus and traveled with it. It is roughly estimated that about thirty molecules of the gas cluster around each charged ion.

Fig. 2.—Photograph of the Track of an Ionizing Ray.

Utilizing the fact that these ions with their clusters of molecules form nuclei for the condensation of water vapor, C. T. R. Wilson has by instantaneous photography been able to photograph the track of an ionizing ray through air. The number of the ions produced, and hence the number of drops, is so great that the trail is shown as a continuous line. In the copy of this photograph it will be seen [Pg 11] that at some distance from its source the straight trail is slightly but abruptly bent. Near the end of its course there is another abrupt and much sharper bend. These bends show where the ionizing ray, in this case an alpha particle, has been deflected by more or less direct collision with an atom. These collisions and the final disappearance of the ray will be discussed later.

Taking up now other means of examining these radiations, it is well to consider their action upon a photographic or sensitive plate. It will be recalled that this was the method by which their existence was originally detected. To illustrate the method, the following account of how one such photograph was taken may be given.

The plate was wrapped in two thicknesses of black paper. The objects were placed upon this and the radio-active ore, separated by a board one inch thick, was placed above. The exposure lasted five days. The action is much less rapid and the result not so clearly defined as in the case of photographs taken by X rays. Of course, the removal of the board and the use of more concentrated preparations of radium would give quicker and better results. The method, however, on [Pg 12] account of time consumed and lack of definition is ill adapted to accurate work.

The radiations from radio-active bodies can discharge both positively and negatively electrified bodies by making the air surrounding them a conductor of electricity. To demonstrate this, use is made of an electroscope. If the hinged leaf of such an instrument be electrically charged and a radio-active body be brought into its neighborhood, the electricity will be discharged and the leaf return to its original position. The rapidity of this discharge is used to measure the degree of activity of the body giving off the radiation.

Fig. 3—Photograph of Various Objects taken by means of Pitchblende

Fig. 4.—Gold-leaf Electroscope.

[Pg 13]

It was found by Crookes that a screen covered with phosphorescent zinc sulphide was brightly lighted up when exposed to the radiations. This is due to the bombardment of the zinc sulphide by a type of ray called the alpha ray. Under a magnifying glass this light is seen to be made up of a number of scintillating points of light and is not continuous, each scintillation being of very short duration. By proper subdivision of the field under the lens, the number of scintillations can be counted with close accuracy.

A simple form of apparatus called the spinthariscope has been devised to show these scintillations. A zinc sulphide screen is fixed in one end of a small tube and a plate carrying a trace of radium is placed very close to it. The scintillations can be observed through an adjustable lens at the other end of the tube. Outer light should be cut off, as in a dark room. The screen then appears to be covered with brilliant flashes of light. Other phosphorescent substances, such as barium platino-cyanide, may be substituted for the zinc sulphide, but they do not answer so well.

By penetrating power is meant the power exhibited by the rays of passing through solids of different thicknesses and gases of various depths. This power varies with different radiations and with the nature of the solid or gas. For instance, a sheet of metallic foil may be used and the effect of aluminum will differ from that of gold and the different [Pg 14] rays vary in penetrating power. In the case of gases air will differ from hydrogen, and it is noticed that certain rays disappear after penetrating a short distance, while others can penetrate further before being lost.

If the radiations are subjected to the action of a strong magnetic field, it is found that part of them are much deflected in the magnetic field and describe circular orbits, part are only slightly deflected and in the opposite direction from the first, and the remaining rays are entirely unaffected.

Fig. 5.—Showing Magnetic Deflection of α, β, and γ Rays.

By the use of these methods of investigation it is learned that the radiations consist of three types of rays. These have been named the alpha, beta, and gamma rays, respectively. Some radio-active bodies emit all three types, some two, and some only one. The distinguishing characteristic of these types of rays may be summed up as follows: [Pg 15]

The alpha rays have a positive electrical charge and a comparatively low penetrating power. They are slightly deflected in strong magnetic and electric fields. They have a great ionizing power and a velocity about one-fifteenth that of light.

The beta rays are negatively charged and have a greater penetrating power than the alpha rays. They show a strong deflection in magnetic and electric fields, have less ionizing power than the alpha rays, and a velocity of the same order as light.

The gamma rays are very penetrating and are not deflected in the magnetic or electric fields. They have the least ionizing power and a very great velocity.

The penetrating power of each type is complex and varies with the source, so the statements given are but generalizations. The alpha rays are projected particles which lose energy in penetrating matter. As to the power of ionizing gases, if that for the α rays is taken as 10,000, then the β rays would be approximately 100 and the γ rays 1.

The rays are examined and measured in several ways: 1. By their action on the sensitive photographic plates. The use of this method is laborious, consumes time, and for comparative measurements of intensity is uncertain as to effect.

2. By electrical methods, using electroscopes, quadrant [Pg 16] electrometers, etc. These are the methods most used.

3. By exposure to magnetic and electric fields, noting extent and direction of deflection.

4. By their relative absorption by solids and gases.

5. By the scintillations on a zinc sulphide screen.

The alpha rays have been identified as similar to the so-called canal rays. These were first observed in the study of the X rays. When an electrical discharge is passed through a vacuum tube with a cathode having holes in it, luminous streams pass through the holes toward the side away from the anode and the general direction of the stream. They travel in straight lines and render certain substances phosphorescent. These rays are slightly deflected by a magnetic field and in an opposite direction from that taken by the cathode rays in their deflection. The rays seem to be positive ions with masses never less than that of the hydrogen atom. Their source is uncertain, but they may be derived from the electrodes.

The beta rays are identical in type with the cathode rays and are negative electrons.

The gamma rays are analogous to the X rays and are of the order of light. They are in general considerably more penetrating than X rays. For example, the gamma rays sent out by 30 milligrams of radium can be detected by an electroscope after passing through 30 centimeters of iron, a much greater thickness than can be penetrated by the ordinary X rays.

[Pg 17]

CHAPTER III

CHANGES IN RADIO-ACTIVE BODIES

Is this power of emitting radiations a permanent property or is it lost with the passage of time? The first investigations of the activity of uranium and thorium showed no loss of intensity at the end of several years, and radium also seemed to show no decrease in its enormous activity. Polonium, however, was found to lose most of its activity in a year, and later it appeared that some radio-active substances lost most of their activity in the course of a few minutes or hours.

A phenomenon called induced or secondary radio-activity was also observed. Thus a metal plate or wire exposed to the action of thorium oxide for some hours became itself active. This induced activity was not permanent but decreased to half its value in about eleven hours and practically disappeared within a week. Similar phenomena were observed when radium was substituted for thorium.

In 1900 Crookes precipitated a solution of an active uranium salt with ammonium carbonate. The precipitate was dissolved so far as possible in an excess of the reagent, leaving an insoluble residue. This residue was many hundred times more [Pg 18] active, weight for weight, than the original salt, and the solution containing the salt was practically inactive. At the end of a year the uranium salt had regained its activity while the residue had become inactive.

Another method of obtaining the same result is to dissolve crystallized uranium nitrate in ether. Two layers of solution are formed, one ether and the other water coming from the water of crystallization. The aqueous layer is active, while the water layer is inactive. Similarly, by adding barium chloride solution to a solution of a salt of uranium and then precipitating the barium as sulphate, the activity is transferred to this precipitate. These experiments give proof of the formation and separation of a radio-active body by ordinary chemical operations.

So, too, in the case of thorium salts a substance can be obtained by means of ammonium hydroxide which is several thousand times more active than an equal weight of the original salt. After standing a month, the separated material has lost its activity and the thorium salt has regained it. Here, again, there is the formation, separation, and loss of a radio-active body.

Now, these are ordinary chemical processes for the separation of distinct chemical individuals. The results, therefore, lead naturally to the conclusions: (1) it would seem that uranium and thorium are themselves inactive and the activity is due to some other substance formed by these elements; (2) this active substance is produced by some [Pg 19] transformation in those elements, for on standing the activity is regained. This latter conclusion is startling, for it indicates a change in the atom which, up to the time of this discovery, was deemed unchangeable under the influence of such physical and chemical changes as were known to us.

The search for new radio-active bodies and the study of their characteristics has been systematically and successfully carried on. The bodies obtained in the above experiments were named uranium X and thorium X, respectively. Further, it became clear from the investigation of uranium minerals that radium, polonium, actinium, and ionium originated from uranium. From thorium minerals a body was separated called mesothorium, which was analogous to radium. Both thorium and radium were found to give off a radio-active gas. The first lost half of its activity in less than one minute. The second was more stable and lost half of its activity in about four days. The name radium emanation was given to the latter and it was found chemically and physically to belong to the class of monatomic or noble gases, such as helium, argon, neon, etc., which had been discovered by Ramsay. In some cases the chemical action was determined and these new bodies were found analogous to well-known elements, as radium to barium, polonium to bismuth. The physical properties were investigated and, where possible, spectra were mapped and atomic weights determined.

[Pg 20] It is clear, therefore, that these bodies are elemental in character and as such are made up of distinct, similar atoms, just as the commonly recognized elements are believed to be. In this way more than thirty new elements have been added to the list. These new elements are called radio-active elements, but it is an open question whether all atoms do not possess this property in greater or less degree. Certainly, it is possessed in varying degree by four of the old elements widely separated in the Periodic System, namely, uranium, thorium, rubidium, and potassium. The last two, while feebly active themselves, do not form any secondary radio-active substance so far as is known. Only two of the elements, then, can definitely be said to go through these transformations. It is just possible that radio-activity may be found to be a common property of all atoms and of all matter.

It is important to know how these new bodies were discovered and distinguished from one another. Two properties are relied upon. One is the nature of the rays emitted and the other is the duration of the activity. Of course, knowledge of the physical and chemical properties is also of great importance whenever obtainable.

The nature of the radiation is a distinguishing characteristic, though similarity here does not prove identity of substances. Some emit α rays only, some emit β rays, some emit two of the possible rays, as for instance, β and γ, and [Pg 21] some emit all three. The rays may also differ in the velocity with which they are emitted by different radio-active substances. Thus, in the case of one substance the α rays may have a slightly greater or less penetrating power than those emitted by some other substance, and this may be true also of the other rays.

The duration of the activity is called the life period. This is absolutely fixed for each body and furnishes the most important mode of differentiating among them. It measures the relative stability and is the time which must elapse before their activity is lost and they, changing into something else, entirely disappear. The measure usually adopted is the half-value period. Two hypotheses are made use of:

1. That there is a constant production of fresh radio-active matter by the radio-active body.

2. That the activity of the matter so formed decreases according to an exponential law with the time from the moment of its formation.

These hypotheses agree with the experimental results. The decrease and rise of activity, for example, of uranium and uranium X, and also of thorium and thorium X, have been measured, plotted, and the equations worked out.

Manifestly, a state of equilibrium will be reached when the rate of loss of activity of the matter already produced is balanced by the activity of the new matter [Pg 22] produced. This equilibrium and the knowledge of the rate of decrease in general will have little value if this rate, like chemical changes, is subject to the influence of chemical and physical conditions. The rate of decrease has been found to be unaltered by any known chemical or physical agency. For instance, neither the highest temperatures applicable nor the cold of liquid air have any appreciable effect.

In order to measure the disintegration of a radio-active body in units of time so that the rate may be comparable with that of other radio-active bodies, the relation between the amounts under consideration must be a definite one. For this purpose equal weights of the bodies are not taken, but use is made of the amounts which are in equilibrium with a fixed amount of the parent substance.

One gram of radium has been settled upon as the standard for that series and a unit known as the "curie" has been adopted to express the equilibrium quantity of radium emanation. Thus, a curie of radium emanation (or niton) is the weight (or, as this is a gas, the volume at standard pressure and temperature) of the emanation in equilibrium with one gram of radium. This, by calculation and experiment, is found to be 0.63 cubic millimeter. When this amount has been produced by one gram of radium, the formation and decay will exactly balance one another. This is, therefore, one curie of emanation.

[Pg 23] The measurement of the rate of decay is difficult but can be carried out with great accuracy, even down to seconds, in the case of certain short-lived bodies. Errors crept in at first from the failure to completely separate the substances produced in the series, and sometimes because of the simultaneous production of two substances.

As stated, the decay follows an exponential law. The time required for the decay of activity to half-value does not mean, therefore, that there will be total decay in twice that time. Thus the half-value period for uranium X is about 22 days. The period for complete decay is about 160 days. This half-value period corresponds to the half-value recovery period of uranium, which is also 22 days.

These were the earlier figures obtained for uranium X and they illustrate some of the difficulties surrounding such determinations. It was found later that the body examined as uranium X was really a constant mixture and of course the decay and recovery periods were also composite. It required later and very skilful work to separate them into the bodies indicated in the disintegration series.

The half-value period for thorium X is much shorter, namely, a little over four days, and this is also the recovery period for thorium X. The plotted decay and recovery curves will intersect at this point.

The consecutive disintegration series, with the half-value periods, for the uranium and thorium series as [Pg 24] given by Soddy are seen in the following tables. They are probably subject to some changes on further and more accurate determination. The nature of the rays emitted is also given.

Fig. 6.—Disintegration Series for Uranium, Actinium, and Thorium, as Given by Soddy.

[Pg 25]

CHAPTER IV

NATURE OF THE ALPHA PARTICLE

The remarkable disintegrations related in the last chapter, in which the heaviest known elementary atom—that of uranium (at. wt. 238)—is by successive stages changed into others of lower atomic weight, afford a clue to the nature of the atom and to that goal of the chemist, the final constitution of matter. The composite nature of the atom and some sort of interrelation of the elements had previously been made apparent from a study of the Periodic System and data gathered still earlier, but all attempts at working out a so-called genesis of the elements had proved vague and unsatisfactory.

To get an understanding of the disintegration occurring in radio-active substances, the nature of the rays produced must be known. These rays are the cause of the activity and their emission accompanies the changes or disintegration. They have for the sake of convenience been called the alpha, beta, and gamma rays. The gamma rays have been identified with the X rays discovered by Röntgen and are a form of energy analogous to light. The beta rays are particles of negative electricity or electrons. With [Pg 26] these, then, we have some degree of familiarity. But what are the alpha rays? An answer to this question should make clearer the character of the changes taking place, and should give some insight into the composition and mechanism of the atom.

It has already been stated that these alpha rays are similar or analogous to the canal rays, but this advances the matter very little, as the nature of these canal rays has not been fully determined. The full identity with them, if proved, should have an important theoretical bearing.

In the first place, these alpha rays have been found to be made up of solid particles, that is, of what we are accustomed to call matter. Since it has become more and more difficult to draw a clear distinction between matter and energy, it would perhaps be better to say that these particles appear to have some of the properties hitherto attributed solely to matter. The best evidence that these particles are of atomic mass is furnished by their deflection in electric and magnetic fields.

It is not of first importance to discuss this or other proofs of the material nature of these particles. That they carry a charge of positive electricity is, however, a fact of very great import. The value of this charge has been carefully determined by a number of investigators working with different sources of the alpha particles and has been found to [Pg 27] be 9.3 × 10^-10 electrostatic units (.000,000,000,93 e.s.). From the consideration of the charge upon an electron previously obtained by J. J. Thomson and others, it was concluded that the alpha particle carried two unit positive charges; the fundamental unit charge, therefore, is half this value, or 4.65 × 10^-10 e.s.

To determine the nature of the alpha particle a crucial experiment was carried out by Rutherford and Royds, which was described as follows:

Fig. 7.—Apparatus Used in Experiment by Rutherford and Royds.

A large quantity of radium emanation was compressed into a fine glass tube A, about 1.5 cm. long. This tube, which was sealed to a larger capillary tube B, was sufficiently thin to allow the alpha particles from the emanation and its products to pass through, but sufficiently thick to withstand atmospheric pressure. The thickness of the glass wall was in most cases less than .01 mm. On introducing the emanation into the tube, the escape of the alpha particles from the emanation was clearly seen by the scintillations produced at some distance on a zinc sulphide screen. After this test the glass tube A was surrounded by a glass tube T and a small spectrum tube V attached to it. The tube [Pg 28] T was exhausted to a charcoal vacuum. By means of the mercury column H, the gases in the tube T could at any time be compressed into the spectrum tube V and the nature of the gases which had been produced determined spectroscopically. It was found that two days after the introduction of the emanation into A the spectrum showed the yellow line of helium, and after six days the whole helium spectrum was observed. In order to be certain that the helium, coming possibly from some other source, had not diffused through the thin walls of the tube A, the emanation was pumped out and helium substituted. No trace of helium could be observed in the vacuum tube after several days, showing that the helium observed in the first experiment must have originated from the alpha particles which had been propelled through the thin glass tube into the outer tube.

Most of the alpha particles are propelled with such force that they penetrate some distance into the walls of the outer tube and some of these gradually diffuse out into the exhausted space. The presence of helium in the spectrum tube can be detected after a shorter interval if a thin cylinder of lead is placed over the emanation tube, since the particles fired into the lead diffuse out more rapidly than from glass.

A still more definite proof of the identity of the alpha particle with the helium atom was obtained by removing the outer glass tube T and placing a cylinder of lead over the emanation tube in the open air. Helium was [Pg 29] always detected in the lead after it had remained several hours over the thin tube containing a large quantity of the emanation. In order to test for the presence of helium in the lead, the gases present were released by melting the lead in a closed vessel. There can thus be no doubt that the alpha particle becomes a helium atom when its positive charge is neutralized.

Thus the chemist was afforded the experience of the building up of at least one element under his observation, and both the analysis and synthesis of matter have been revealed through the discoveries of radio-activity.

It is of interest at this point to learn something of the history of helium and its occurrence. In 1868 there was discovered by Janssen and Lockyer a bright yellow line in the spectrum of the sun's chromosphere. Because of its origin the name helium was given to the supposed new element causing it. Later it was found in the spectra of many of the stars, and because of its predominance in some of these they were called helium stars. Its existence on our planet was not detected for nearly thirty years.

In 1895, in connection with the discovery of argon in the atmosphere, a search was made to see if the latter element could be obtained from mineral sources. In analyzing certain uranium minerals Hillebrand had found considerable quantities of a gas which he took to be a peculiar form of nitrogen. Ramsay made a further examination of the gas coming from these minerals and [Pg 30] the spectroscope revealed the yellow line of helium, thus at last proving the presence of this element on the earth. It is known now to be present in thorium minerals, in the waters of radio-active wells, and in minute amounts in the atmosphere. Its occurrence in every case, in the light of the experiment described above, would seem to be due to the presence of radio-active changes.

Helium, on account of its chemical inactivity and physical properties, is classed along with argon, neon, krypton, and xenon in the zero group of the Periodic System, and forms with them the monatomic, inert gases. In this class are now placed also the three radio-active gases, emanating respectively from radium, thorium, and actinium. These are generally known as radium emanation, thorium emanation, and actinium emanation. The first mentioned was once called niton. Emanium was the name originally proposed by Giesel for the body now known as actinium.

The calculated rate of production of helium in the series in equilibrium with one gram of radium is 158 cubic millimeters per year. This corresponds quite well with the experimental results.

Some of the more important atomic and radio-active constants are given in the following table. They are recorded here to show how helpful the study of radio-activity has been in working out the composition of matter, and to give some idea of [Pg 31] the magnitude of the numbers and the minuteness of the quantities dealt with.

[Pg 32]

CHAPTER V

THE STRUCTURE OF THE ATOM

A study of the properties of radium will aid in throwing light upon the question as to the building up of the atom. First to be considered are the usual properties which distinguish an elementary body. Metallic radium has been prepared by a method similar to that used in the preparation of barium. It is a pure white metal, melting at 700°, and far more volatile than barium. It rapidly alters on exposure to the air, probably forming a nitride. It energetically decomposes water and the product dissolves in the water. Its atomic weight is 226.

Radium forms a series of salts analogous in appearance and chemical action to those of barium. In the course of time they become colored, especially if mixed barium salts. The radiations from radium produce marked chemical effects in a number of substances. Carbon dioxide is changed into carbon, oxygen, and carbon monoxide, and the latter is changed into carbon and oxygen. Ammonia is dissociated into nitrogen and hydrogen; hydrochloric acid into chlorine and hydrogen. Oxygen is condensed into ozone. In general, the action upon gases appears to be similar to that [Pg 33] of the silent electric discharge. Water is decomposed into hydrogen and oxygen. If moist radium chloride or a salt of radium containing water of crystallization is sealed in a glass tube, the gradual accumulation of hydrogen and oxygen will burst the tube.

The radiations rapidly decompose organic matter with the evolution of gases. Thus grease from stopcocks of apparatus used with radium or paraffin will give off carbon dioxide. Under an intense alpha radiation paraffin or vaseline become hard and infusible. White phosphorus is changed into red.

The action upon living tissue is most noteworthy, as its possible use as a remedial agent is dependent upon this. A small amount of a radium salt enclosed in a glass tube will cause a serious burn on flesh exposed to it. It therefore has to be handled with care and undue exposure to the radiations must be avoided. Cancer sacs shrivel up and practically disappear under its action. Whether the destruction of whatever causes the cancer is complete is at least open to serious doubt.

The coagulating effect upon globulin is interesting. When two solutions of globulin from ox serum are taken and acetic acid added to one while ammonia is added to the other, the opalescence in drops of the former is rapidly diminished on exposure to radium, showing a more complete solution, whereas the latter solution rapidly turns to a jelly and becomes opaque, indicating a greatly decreased solubility.

The greater part of the tremendous energy evolved [Pg 34] by radium is due to the emission of the alpha particles, and in comparison the beta and gamma rays together supply only a small fraction. This energy may be measured as heat. It was first observed that a radium compound maintained a temperature several degrees higher than that of the air around it. The rate of heat production was later measured by means of an ice calorimeter and also by noting the strength of the current required to raise a comparison tube of barium salt to the same temperature. Both methods showed that the heat produced was at the rate of about 135 gram calories per hour. As the emission is continuous, one gram of radium would therefore emit about 1,180,000 gram calories in the course of a year. At the end of 2000 years it would still emit 590,000 gram calories per year. Such a production of energy so far surpasses all experience that it becomes almost inconceivable. It is futile to speak of it in terms of the heat evolved by the combustion of hydrogen, which is the greatest that can be produced by chemical means.

This effect is unaltered at low temperatures, as has been tested by immersing a tube containing radium in liquid air. It should be stated that these measurements were made after the radium had reached an equilibrium with its products; that is, after waiting at least a month after its preparation. The evolution of heat from radium and the radio-active substances is, in a sense, a secondary effect, as it measures the radiant [Pg 35] energy transformed into heat energy by the active matter itself and whatever surrounds it. Let us repeat, therefore, that the total amount of energy pent up in a single atom of radium almost passes our powers of conception.

The facts gathered so far justify and necessitate a theory which shall satisfactorily explain them, and since these phenomena are not caused by nor subject to the influence of external agencies, they must refer to changes taking place within the atom—in other words, a theory of disintegration. In the main, these facts may be summed up as the emission of certain radiations from known elemental matter: the material alpha particles with positive charge, the beta particles or negative electrons, and the gamma rays analogous to X rays. The emission of these rays results in the production of great heat. Then there is the law of transformations by which whole series of new elements are generated from the original element and maintain a constant equilibrium of growth and decay in the series. Lastly, we have the production of helium from the alpha particles.

In explanation of these phenomena, Rutherford offered the hypothesis that the atoms of certain elements were unstable and subject to disintegration. The only elements definitely known to come under this description are the two having atoms of the greatest known mass, thorium (232) and uranium (238).

[Pg 36] The atoms of uranium, for instance, are supposed to be not permanent but unstable systems. According to the hypothesis, about 1 atom in every 10¹⁸ becomes unstable each second and breaks up with a violent explosion for so small a mass of matter. One, or possibly two alpha particles are expelled with great velocity. This alpha particle corresponds to an atom of helium with an atomic weight of 4, and its loss reduces the original atomic weight to 234 with the formation of a new element, having changed properties corresponding to the new atomic weight. This new element is uranium X₁.

These new atoms are far more unstable than those of uranium, and the decomposition proceeds at a new rate of 1 in 10⁷ per second. So at a definite, measurable rate this stepwise disintegration proceeds. The explosions are not in all cases equally violent in going from element to element, nor are the results the same. Sometimes alpha particles alone are expelled, sometimes beta, or two of them together, as alpha and beta.

The new product may remain with the unchanged part of the original matter. Thus there would be an accumulation of it until its own decay balances its production, resulting eventually in a state of equilibrium.

In order to explain the electrical and optical properties of matter, the hypothesis was made that the atom consisted of positively and negatively electrified particles. Later it was shown that negative electrons exist in all kinds of matter. [Pg 37] Various attempts were made to work out a model of such an atom in which these particles were held in equilibrium by electrical forces. The atom of Lord Kelvin consisted of a uniform sphere of positive electrification throughout which a number of negative electrons were distributed, and J. J. Thomson has determined the properties of this type as to the number of particles, their arrangement and stability.

According to Rutherford, the atom of uranium may be looked upon as consisting of a central charge of positive electricity surrounded by a number of concentric rings of negative electrons in rapid motion. The positively charged centre is made up of a complicated system in movement, consisting in part of charged helium and hydrogen atoms, and practically the whole charge and mass of the atom is concentrated at the centre. The central system of the atom is from some unknown cause unstable, and one of the helium atoms escapes from the central mass as an alpha particle.

There are, confessedly, difficulties connected with this conception of the atom which need not, however, be discussed here. Much remains to be learned as to the mechanics of the atom, and the hypothesis outlined above will probably have to be materially altered as knowledge grows. Perhaps it may have to be entirely abandoned in favor of some more satisfactory solution. Until such time it at least suffices as a mental picture around which the known facts group themselves. In [Pg 38] this picture energy and matter lose their old-time distinctness of definition. Discrete subdivisions of energy are recognized which may be called charged particles without losing their significance. Some of these subdivisions charged in a certain way or with neutralized charge exhibit the properties of so-called matter.

This conception of the atom would doubtless fail of much support were it not for certain experimental facts which lend great weight to it. Certain suppositions can be based on this theory mathematically reasoned out and tested by experiment. Predictions thus based on mathematical reasoning and afterward confirmed by experiment give a very convincing impression that truth lies at the bottom.

The first of these experimental proofs comes under the head of what is known as the scattering of the alpha particles, a phenomenon which, when first observed, proved hard to explain. If an alpha particle in its escape from the parent atom should come within the influence of the supposed outer electrical field of some other atom, it should be deflected from its course and, the intensity of the two charges being known, the angle of deflection could be calculated. For instance, if it came to what might be called a head-on collision with the positive central nucleus of another atom, it would recoil if it were itself of lesser mass, or would propel the other forward if that were the lighter.

[Pg 39] The experiment is carried out by placing a thin metal foil over a radio-active body, as radium C, which expels alpha particles with a high velocity, and counting the number of alpha particles which are scattered through an angle greater than 90° and so recoil toward their source. This has been done by a number of investigators and it has been found that the angle of scattering and the number of recoil particles depend upon the atomic weight of the metal used as foil. For example, if gold is used, the number of recoil atoms is one in something less than 8,000.

Taking the atomic weight of gold into consideration, Rutherford calculated mathematically that this was about the number which should be driven backward. But he went further and calculated also the number which should be returned by aluminum, which has an atomic weight of only about one-seventh that of gold. Two investigators determined experimentally the number for aluminum and their results agreed with Rutherford's calculations.

The metals from aluminum to gold have been examined in this way. The number of recoil particles increases with the atomic weight of the metal. Comparing experiment with theory, the central charge in an atom corresponds to about one-half the atomic weight multiplied by the charge on an electron, or, as it is expressed, ½ Ae.

There is only one lighter atom than helium, namely, hydrogen, which has a mass only one-fourth as great. [Pg 40] When alpha particles are discharged into hydrogen, a few of the latter atoms are found to be propelled to a distance four times as great as that reached by the alpha particles.

Parallel with the experiments mentioned, there is what is called the stopping power of substances. This means the depth or thickness of a substance necessary to put a stop to the course of the alpha particles. This gives the range of the alpha particles in such substances and is connected in a simple way with the atomic weight, that is, it is again fixed by the mass of the opposing atom. This stopping power of an atom for an alpha particle is approximately proportional to the square root of its atomic weight.

Considering gases, for instance, if the range in hydrogen be 1, then the range in oxygen, the atomic weight of which is 16, is only √(1/16) or ¼. Generally in the case of metals the weight of matter per unit area required to stop the alpha particle is found to vary according to the square root of the atomic weight of the metal taken.

[Pg 41]

CHAPTER VI

RADIO-ACTIVITY AND CHEMICAL THEORY

It can easily be seen that the revelations of radio-activity must have a far-reaching effect upon chemical theory, throwing light upon, and so bringing nearer, the solution of some of the problems which have been long discussed without arriving at any satisfactory solution. The so-called electro-chemical nature of the elements will certainly be made much clearer. The changes in valence should become intelligible and valence itself should be explained. A fuller understanding of the ionization of electrolytes also becomes possible. As these matters are debatable and the details are still unsettled, it is scarcely appropriate to give here the hypotheses in detail or to enter into any discussion of them. But the promise of solution in accord with the facts is encouraging.

Such progress has been made, however, in regard to a better understanding of the Periodic System that the new facts and their interpretation may well be given. No reliable clue to the meaning of this system and the true relationship between the [Pg 42] elements had been found up to the time when new light was thrown upon it by the discoveries of radio-activity. The underlying principle was unknown and even the statement of what was sometimes erroneously called the Periodic Law was manifestly incorrect and its terms were ignored.

The ordinary statement of the fundamental principle of the Periodic System has been that the properties of the elements were periodic functions of the atomic weights, and that when the elements were arranged in the order of their atomic weights they fell into a natural series, taking their places in the proper related groups.

In accepting this, the interpretation of function was both unmathematical and vague, and the order of the atomic weights was not strictly adhered to but unhesitatingly abandoned to force the group relationship. Wherever consideration of the atomic weight would have placed an element out of the grouping with other elements to which it was clearly related in physical and chemical properties, the guidance of these properties was accepted and that of the atomic weights disregarded. Such shiftings are noted in the cases of tellurium and iodine; cobalt and nickel; argon and potassium. It was most helpful that, following the order of atomic weights, the majority of the elements fell naturally into their places. Otherwise the generalization known as the Periodic System might [Pg 43] have remained for a long time undiscovered and the progress of chemistry would have been greatly retarded.

It is evident that the order of the elements is determined by something else than their atomic weights. From the known facts of radio-activity it would seem that this determining factor is the positive nucleus. And this nucleus also determines the mass or weight of the atom. Taking the elements in their order in the Periodic Series and numbering the positions held by them in this series as 1, 2, 3, etc., we get the position number or what is called the atomic number. This designates the order or position of the element in the series. We must learn that this number marks a position rather than a single element, a statement which will be explained later.

Since the atomic weight is unreliable as a means of settling the position of an element in the series and so fixing its atomic number, how is this number to be determined? Of course, one answer to this question is that we may rely upon a consideration of the general properties, as has been done in the past. Fortunately, other methods have been found by which this may be confirmed. For instance, the stopping and scattering power of the element for alpha particles has been suggested and successfully used.

A most interesting method is due to Moseley's [Pg 44] observations upon the X-ray spectra of the various elements. It has been found that crystals, such as those of quartz, have the power of reflecting and defining the X rays. The spectra given by these rays can be photographed and the wave lengths measured. These X rays are emitted by various substances under bombardment by the cathode rays (negative electrons) and have great intensity and very minute wave lengths. Moseley made use of various metals as anti-cathodes for the production of these rays. These metals ranged from calcium to zinc in the Periodic System. In each case he observed that two characteristic types of X rays of definite intensity and different wave lengths were emitted. From the frequency of these waves there is deduced a simple relation connected with a fundamental quantity which increases in units from one element to the next. This is due to the charge of the positive central nucleus. The number found in this way is one less than the atomic number. Thus the number for calcium is 19 instead of 20 and that for zinc is 29 instead of 30. So, by adding 1 to the number found the atomic number is obtained.

The atomic weight can usually be followed in fixing the atomic number, but where doubt exists the method just given can be resorted to. Thus doubt arises in the case of iron and nickel and cobalt. This would be the order according to the atomic weights. The X-ray method gives the order as iron, cobalt, and [Pg 45] nickel, and this is the accepted order in the Periodic System.

On studying the properties of the elements in a transformation series in connection with the ray emission which produced them, it was seen that these properties were determined in each case by the nature of the ray emitted from the preceding transformation product or parent element.

Each alpha particle emitted means a loss of 4 in the atomic weight. This is the mass of a helium atom. Thus from uranium with an atomic weight of 238 to radium there is a loss of three alpha particles. Therefore, 12 must be subtracted from 238, leaving 226, which agrees closely with the atomic weight of radium as actually determined by the ordinary methods. Uranium X₁, then, would have an atomic weight of 234 and that of ionium would be 230. The other intermediate elements, whose formation is due to the loss of beta particles only, show no decrease in atomic weight.

From uranium to lead there is a loss of 8 alpha particles, or 32 units in atomic weight. This would give for the final product an atomic weight of 206. The atomic weight of lead is 207.17. It is not at all certain that the final product of this series is ordinary lead. The facts are such that they would lead one to think that it is not. It is known only that the end product would probably be some element closely resembling lead chemically and hence [Pg 46] difficult or impossible to separate from it. Several accurate determinations of lead coming from uranium minerals, which always carry this element and in an approximately definite ratio to the amount of uranium present, show atomic weights of 206.40; 206.36; and 206.54. Even the most rigid methods of purification fail to change these results. The lead in these minerals might therefore be considered as coming in the main from the disintegration of the uranium atom and, though chemically resembling lead, as being in reality a different element with different atomic weight.

Furthermore, in the thorium series 6 alpha particles are lost before reaching the end product, which again is perhaps the chemical analogue of lead. The atomic weight here should be 232 less 24, or 208. Determinations of the atomic weight of lead from thorite, a thorium mineral nearly free from uranium, gave 208.4.

The end product of the actinium series is also an element resembling lead, but both the beginning and ending of this series are still in obscurity.

The loss of 4 units in the atomic weight of an element on the expulsion of an alpha particle is accompanied by a change of chemical properties which removes the new element two groups toward the positive side in the Periodic System.

Thus ionium is so closely related to thorium and so resembles it chemically that it is properly classed along with thorium as a quadrivalent element in the fourth [Pg 47] group. Ionium expels an alpha particle and becomes radium, which is a bivalent element resembling barium belonging to the second group. Radium then expels an alpha particle and becomes the gas, radium emanation, which is an analogue of argon and belongs to the zero group. Other instances might be cited which go to show that in all cases the loss of an alpha particle makes a change of two places toward the left or positive side of the System.

The loss of a beta particle causes no change in the atomic weight but does cause a shift for each beta particle of one group toward the right or negative side of the System. Two such losses, then, will counterbalance the loss of an alpha particle and bring the new element back to the group originally occupied by its progenitor. Thus uranium in the sixth group loses an alpha particle and the product UX₁ falls in the fourth group. One beta particle is then lost and UX₂ belonging to the fifth group is formed. With the loss of one more beta particle the new element returns to the sixth group from which the transformation began.

The table on page 48, as adapted from Soddy, affords a general view of these changes.[Pg 48]

Radio-active Elements from Uranium and Thorium Placed in the Periodic Systems
Adapted from Soddy

An examination of the table will show a number of different elements falling in the same position in a group of the Periodic System irrespective of their atomic weights. These are chemically inseparable so far as the present limitations of [Pg 49] chemical analysis are concerned. Even the spectra of these elements seem to be identical so far as known. This identity extends to most of the physical properties, but this demands much further investigation. For this new phenomenon Soddy has suggested the word isotope for the element and isotopic for the property, and these names have come into general use.

Manifestly, we have come across a phenomenon here which quite eliminates the atomic weight as a determining factor as to position in the Periodic or Natural System or of the elemental properties in general. All of the properties of the bodies which we call elements, and consequently of their compounds and hence of matter in general, seem to depend upon the balance maintained between the charges of negative and positive electricity which, according to Rutherford's theory, go to make up the atom.

It is evident that any study of chemical phenomena and chemical theory is quite incomplete without a study of radio-activity and the transformations which it produces.

In concluding this outline of the main facts of radio-activity, it is of interest to discuss briefly the presence of radio-active material on this planet and in the stars. Facts enough have been gathered to show the probable universality of this phenomenon of radio-activity. Whether this means solely the disintegration of the uranium and thorium [Pg 50] atoms, or whether other elements are also transformed under the intensity of the agencies at work in the universe, is of course a question as yet unsolved.

The presence of uranium and thorium widely distributed throughout the crust of the earth would lead to the conclusion that their disintegration products would be found there also. Various rocks of igneous origin have been examined revealing from 4.78 × 10^-12 to 0.31 × 10^-12 grams of radium per gram of the rock. Aqueous rocks have shown a lesser amount, ranging from 2.92 × 10^-12 to 0.86 × 10^-12 grams. As the soil is formed by the decomposition of these rocks, radium is present in varying amounts in all kinds of soil.

As radium is transformed into the gaseous emanation, this will escape wherever the soil is not enclosed. For instance, a larger amount of radio-activity is found in the soil of caves and cellars than in open soils. If an iron pipe is sunk into a soil and the air of the soil sucked up into a large electroscope, the latter instrument will show the effect of the rays emitted and will measure the degree of activity. Also the interior of the pipe will receive a deposit of the radio-active material and will show appreciable radio-activity after being removed from the soil.

This radium emanation is dissolved in the soil waters, wells, springs, and rivers, rendering them more or less radio-active, and sometimes the muddy deposit at the bottom of a spring shows decided radio-activity.

[Pg 51] The emanation also escapes into the air so that many observations made in various places show that the radium emanation is everywhere present in the atmosphere. Neither summer nor winter seems to affect this emanation, and it extends certainly to a height of two or three miles. Rain, falling through the air, dissolves some of the emanation, so that it may be found in freshly-fallen rain water and also in freshly-fallen snow. Radio-active deposits are found upon electrically charged wires exposed near the earth's surface.

As helium is the resulting product of the alpha particles emitted by the emanation and other radio-active bodies, it is found in the soil air, soil waters, and atmosphere.

Average measurements of the radio-activity of the atmosphere have led to the calculation that about one gram of radium per square kilometer of the earth's surface is requisite to keep up the supply of the emanation.

A number of estimates have been given as to the heat produced by the radio-active transformations going on in the material of this planet. Actual data are scarce and mere assumptions unsatisfactory, so little that is worth while can be deduced. It is possible that this source of heat may have an appreciable effect upon or serve to balance the earth's rate of cooling.

Meteorites of iron coming from other celestial bodies have not shown the presence of radium. Aerolites or stone meteorites have been found to contain as much as similar terrestrial rock. [Pg 52] Since the sun contains helium and some stars show its presence as predominating, this suggests the presence of radio-active matter in these bodies. In addition, the spectral lines of uranium, radium, and the radium emanation have been reported as being found in the sun's spectrum and also in the new star, Nova Geminorum 2. These observations await further investigation and confirmation. So far as the sun's chromosphere is concerned, the possible amount of radium present would seem to be very small. If this is true, radio-active processes could have little to do with the sun's heat. The statement is made by Rutherford that indirect evidence obtained from the study of the aurora suggests that the sun emits rays similar in type to the alpha and beta rays. Such rays would be absorbed, and the gamma rays likewise, in passing through the earth's atmosphere and so escape ordinary observation. All of this is but further evidence of the unity of matter and of forces in the universe.

[Pg 53]

INDEX

Actinium, discovery of, 6

Activity, induced, 17

Alpha particles, effect of loss on Atomic Weight, 45
electrical charge of, 26
form helium, 27
nature of, 25
penetrating power of, 39
position of element changed by its loss, 46
recoil, 39
scattering of, 38
solid, 26

Atom, constitution of, 36
Kelvin's, 37
models of, 37
Rutherford's, 37

Atomic number, determination of, 43


Becquerel's experiments, 2

Beta particles, change in position of element by loss of, 47


Chalcolite, natural and artificial, 4

Constants, table of, 31

Curie unit, 22


Disintegration of the element, 25

Disintegration series, 24

Disintegration theory, 35


Electroscope, 12

Equilibrium series, 22


Helium, characteristics of, 30
discovery of, 29


Ionium, discovery of, 6

Ionization, application of electric field to, 10
experimental confirmation, 9

Ionization of gases, 7
theory of, 8

Ions, size and nature of, 10

Isotopes, 47


Lead, atomic weight varies with source, 45
radio-active, 6
the end product, 45

Life-periods of radio-active bodies, 21


Periodic system, 41
basis of, 42

Polonium, discovery of, 4

Positive nucleus, influence of, 43

Potassium, radio-activity of, 3


Radiations, action on phosphorescent bodies, 13
action on photographic plates, 11
discharge electrified bodies, 12
magnetic deflection of, 14
measurements of, 15
penetrating power of, 13, 15
[Pg 54]
Radio-active bodies, elemental nature of, 20
examination of, 20
life periods of, 21

Radio-activity, an atomic property, 3
cosmical, 51
influence on chemical theory, 41
products in atmosphere, 51
products in earth's crust, 50
products in soil waters, 50

Radium, action on organic matter, etc., 33
amount in pitchblende, 5
discovery of, 5
emanation, 22
energy evolved by, 34
properties of, 5, 32

Rays, alpha, 15, 16, 26
beta, 15, 16
gamma, 15, 16
identification of, 16, 25
magnetic deflection of, 14
photographing track of, 10
types of, 14

Rubidium, radio-activity of, 3


Spinthariscope, 13

Stopping power of substances, 39


Thorium X, discovery of, 18, 21


Uranium atom, disintegration of, 36

Uranium minerals, radio-activity of, 3

Uranium X, discovery of, 17, 21, 23


X-ray spectra, 44


Zinc sulphide screen, 13

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES

Images have been moved from the middle of a paragraph to the closest paragraph break. Other than that, the original text has been reproduced as such.

End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of A Brief Account of Radio-activity, by 
Francis Preston Venable

*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF RADIO-ACTIVITY ***

***** This file should be named 32307-h.htm or 32307-h.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
        http://www.gutenberg.org/3/2/3/0/32307/

Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images
generously made available by The Internet Archive/American
Libraries.)


Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
will be renamed.

Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
redistribution.



*** START: FULL LICENSE ***

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
http://gutenberg.org/license).


Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works

1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.  See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
States.

1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org

1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
1.E.9.

1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.

1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.

1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
that

- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."

- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
     License.  You must require such a user to return or
     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
     Project Gutenberg-tm works.

- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
     of receipt of the work.

- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.

1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
your equipment.

1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH F3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.


Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm

Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.


Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
http://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.

The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
page at http://pglaf.org

For additional contact information:
     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
     Chief Executive and Director
     gbnewby@pglaf.org


Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
particular state visit http://pglaf.org

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate


Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.

Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.


Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.


Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:

     http://www.gutenberg.org

This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.