The Project Gutenberg eBook of Subject to Vanity
    
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: Subject to Vanity

Author: Margaret Benson

Release date: November 21, 2021 [eBook #66780]

Language: English

Original publication: United States: Dodd, Mead, & Company

Credits: The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)


*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SUBJECT TO VANITY ***





SUBJECT TO VANITY


Τῇ γὰρ ματαιότητι ἡ κτίσις ὑπετάγη, οὐχ ἑκοῡσα ἀλλὰ διὰ τὸν
ὑποτάξαντα, ἐπ’ ἐλπίδι ὅτι καὶ αὐτὴ ἡ κτίσις ἐλευθερωθήσεται ἀπὸ τῆς
δουλείας τῆς φθορᾶς εἰς τὴν ἐλευθερίαν τῆς δόξης τῶν τέκνων τοῦ θεοῦ.




  SUBJECT TO VANITY

  BY
  MARGARET BENSON

  _WITH ILLUSTRATIONS BY THE AUTHOR_

  NEW YORK
  DODD, MEAD, & COMPANY
  1895




  TO
  OUR BETH

  IN LOVE AND GRATITUDE
  FOR
  LIFELONG LOVE
  AND CARE




CONTENTS


                                      PAGE

     I. APOLOGIA PRO FELE MEA            9

    II. CLANDESTINE CORRESPONDENCE      31

   III. IN THE BOSOM OF THE FAMILY      41

    IV. CHANCE ACQUAINTANCE             51

     V. THE DESERTED LOVER              65

    VI. JACK                            75

   VII. A REGULAR FLIRT                 89

  VIII. A FAITHFUL FRIEND               97

    IX. KIDS OF THE GOATS              111

     X. COMMUNITY LIFE                 123

    XI. FINISHED SOLOMON               135




[Illustration]

I

APOLOGIA PRO FELE MEA


Why were cats created? I do not mean this as a sceptical question,
doubtful of any end in their creation; no answer about adaptation and
environment would be adequate, nor any statement of specific use. For
with all the higher animals--that is to say, with all the animals one
intimately knows--there is some beauty of intelligence, physique, or
character which renders them, as one must necessarily believe they
are, ends in themselves, not only means to the perfection of our very
egotistic species. The dog, for instance, has at anyrate moral beauty,
and the stag physical; but the cat, who so often loses her physical
beauty after the first year of her life, and who slinks about with a
weight of strange and secret care on her shoulders, what has she? Who
ever knew a cat of really fine character, and yet why otherwise do they
suffer such bitter experience? Not experience merely of pans and pots
and cat-hunts, which only touch the physical cat; but of the real,
keen, emotional suffering of the moral cat, fierce pangs of envy, and
the burden of alienated affection? I think cats must be meant to be
good rather than beautiful.

When Persis walked out of her travelling-basket, I thought that I
had never seen so pretty a kitten. She was about as long as she was
high, and as broad as she was long; her coat was of grey--or as this
particular shade is called blue--and white, soft, long hair; and she
had olive-yellow eyes. She would not have much to say to me just then;
but when I came into the room, where she had been shut up in the
evening, and saw the little, upright figure sitting on the table beside
a lighted candle, which my nurse had set there in case she should feel
lonely and unhappy in the dark, after a moment’s contemplation--for
Persis is shortsighted--she jumped down and rushed to meet me.

She is very well-bred; of course her white is a mistake--she ought
to be blue all over; but she has all the other signs of good
breeding--long silky tufts in the inside of her paws; ears so
beautifully feathered that all other cats’ ears look distressingly
naked; a little, dark smudge on her pink nose, to show that she knew it
ought to have been black; and now she is full grown, the most beautiful
tail I have ever seen--“like a squirrel,” children say.

[Illustration]

She was not called Persis at first, but Hafiz. The popular rendering of
that as “Uffiz” was not very pretty; and while the salutation to “the
beloved Persis” was being read in the second lesson one Sunday morning,
it suddenly struck me that Persis would be a very nice and appropriate
name for a Persian cat, and the name “took.”

Her manners mostly were charming, and with gracefulness like a
well-born lady she would stretch one hand from her basket to greet one
coming into the room. She was very affectionate; she would put her arms
round my neck in a way I have never known any other cat do, not even
her children. Like most other Persian cats, she would kiss me and lick
my hand. She had, I will confess, one rude trick: when she was in a
larky condition in the twilight, if she caught my eye, she would run,
with her head turned round and the side of her face on the ground, all
about the room, ending up by coming quite close to me, and jumping and
clawing in the air. The position was ludicrous, her head twisted round,
and her eyes fixed on mine so that she could not see what was in front
of her, and ran sometimes into legs of tables and chairs; her nerves,
too, in such a tense condition that if one startled her she would jump
high into the air, and then flee into a corner. She always reminded one
of the way in which a cockney street-boy makes faces if you catch his
eye.

She was not always amiable, the one defect in her character was that
she was liable to “strange fits of passion,” and would pass from play
to anger on occasion without the slightest warning.

She is the fiercest cat towards other animals that I have ever seen.
While she was yet a tiny kitten, I brought up a large semi-Persian
Tom cat to paint. The tiny kitten chased this big creature round and
round the room; if he got under a chair, she got on it, and reached
down a little menacing white paw to slap his face. He submitted meekly,
until, in order to see what would happen at close quarters, I brought
her quite near to him. She spit and swore at him, but thus brought to
bay he knocked her over with a sounding box on each ear, and she fled
under the table, where, with a tiny drop of blood on her face, she
bemoaned herself and appealed for sympathy, the picture of a helpless,
injured child. As for the other cat, once roused he went on growling
and spitting all morning.

The only small quadruped I ever knew Persis not want to fight was a
rabbit. Some children on the place had a tame rabbit which was very
fond of cats. One day she met him out of doors. He saw her and came
running to play with her; she looked with a horrified face for a
moment then turned and fled; she must have thought him a deformed sort
of cat; much as if children met a human being with huge pendent ears
and an uncouth way of walking who wanted to come and play with them.

Persis was very musical. If one whistled to her she would come from any
part of the room, creep up as near to one’s face as she could, purr
loudly, lick one’s face in growing rapture; then, if the whistling
continued, she got over-excited, and had to manifest excessive pleasure
by biting. I am determined to tell a story which no one will believe,
but which is none the less true, that three or four times she has been
found standing on the music-stool and making dabs at the keys with her
forepaws; she, of course, had discovered before that a piano would
make a sound if walked on, and she not unfrequently practised in that
manner, but these three or four times I looked up, being surprised at
hearing the same note repeated, and found her standing as I have said.
However, no one need believe that, and it is their own loss if they do
not; and anyhow, now it is a matter of ancient history, for Persis lost
all care for the æsthetic part of life when she had a family to bring
up.

While she was still an independent lady she used to sleep in my room,
chiefly on my bed. It was a difficult matter to arrange at first,
because I did not want the kitten to sleep on my face, which was her
constant aspiration. Consequently, when I put out the light and settled
to sleep, placing her firmly at the end of the bed, a loud purr was
heard, and a little dark form proceeded to march up, stamping her paws
on the counterpane and drawing them out in rapturous expectation of a
pleasant evening.

Finally we compromised: she was allowed to sleep half-way up, embracing
my arm if she liked. But I was rather glad when this habit was broken,
because she began not to leave me enough room. One of my brothers
thought he would try her in his room one night, but he had broken rest;
for first she made defiant runs at him from the end of the bed, then
in the middle of the night he was waked up by a pitiful howling, of
which he took no notice. Two hours later he was waked again by louder
howling, and then discovered that the cat had got out of one of his
windows, walked on a narrow moulding round to a shut window, and did
not dare to go back again. She was so overjoyed at being taken in that
she fell into the bath. After that she came on his bed.

But I am wandering from the point of my story. Before Persis’ kittens
came she had some friends, but no rivals. She treated her friends in a
rather severe manner at first. One of them was a fox-terrier, called
Don. The first time she was introduced to him she nearly jumped out of
her skin with swearing and spitting. When he went out of the room, she
went round to all the places where he had been and spit at them afresh.
She has a fine scent; if new people have been in the room she always
goes round and smells the places where they have been. She smells every
new dress I have. The meek Don, who could kill a strange cat as soon
as look at it, submitted wonderfully to her whims; and when she flew
at him, beside herself with passion because he was enjoying the coffee
sugar at the bottom of a cup merely picked the cup up in his teeth and
trotted off. But she soon got accustomed to him. And then, distressed
at his appearance, tried to lick the black spots off his back; used
stealthily to wash the inside of his ears, ready always to rain a
shower of blows on his nose with the tips of her paws if he so much
as turned round. Then she began to worship in a manner not common to
cats; with the sincerest flattery, she used to lie at his feet in the
same position that he was lying in; if, for instance, he was lying with
his legs stretched straight out below him, she would lie with her back
touching the tips of his toes and her legs stretched out in the same
way--an unnatural position for a cat.

[Illustration]

Now her daughter, the image of Persis, will lie in the same way at
Don’s feet; but I have never heard of any other cat doing it.

After this she became acquainted with a Gordon setter, and the
obstinate curliness of Di’s hair gave Persis as much occupation as
those black spots on Don’s back which never would come off. But she
was jealous of none of these, she knew herself to be--as a cat--so
infinitely superior to them. She was jealous of nobody and nothing
until her kittens came.

There are certain great facts in life which nothing can prepare you
for. No amount of reasoning, no previous imagination, will make you
in the least able to calculate your feelings. Such must be the moment
to very many when they realise that they will die; such is often the
moment when people or creatures realise that there exists a little
helpless living thing, theirs peculiarly, and yet not themselves. The
change that her child can work in a grumbling, egotistical woman is
incomprehensible,--could not have been argued by any logic; but far
more surprising the event must be to a creature who does not know what
is going to happen, cannot guess that her feelings will be moved in a
totally new way, and could not realise beforehand that such an event
might happen to her as it had to others. I tried to prepare Persis
once; I gave her a stuffed kitten on a penwiper to play with. She
looked at it with some interest, licked it a little, shook it, and left
it; treated it much as a rather careless child treats her doll, but
more amiably than she treated other animals. Nor could she dream that
little bits of fur,--much like that to the outward eye,--endued with
just enough life to tremble on their little weak legs, and utter tiny,
plaintive shrieks, should rouse her to such a passionate emotion as to
make her forget her own pressing bodily wants.

We know very little more than she did about it, we know just the bare
fact that it always will be so, but why it _should_ be so we know no
more than she. Who understands the miracle by which an utterly selfish
creature, whose natural instinct is to hate all other animals, and,
indeed, only to tolerate human beings because it can make use of them,
should be made to know and feel, in a short ten minutes’ space perhaps,
an overpowering, passionate, protective love?

One morning Persis did not feel very well, in sign whereof she showed
a decided intention to occupy my bed. She was sent down to an empty
bedroom while a hamper of hay was being prepared for her; but when
her invalid couch was ready she was nowhere to be found; a search
discovered finally that she had put herself to bed in the room already,
under the counterpane. Still, she was thinking of nobody but herself.
Later in the morning I visited her,--when three little helpless,
shapeless, furry things were moving about her, and Persis was not
thinking of herself at all. One would not have believed an animal’s
expression could change so much; the overwhelming surprise, the intense
affection, were in her face as clearly as they could be in an human
face; for the time her egotism had gone, she was not a cat, she was a
mother. Formerly she had been shy of people, frightened of men; now, as
one after another came in to see her kittens, she showed no fear, and,
what was even more curious, no anger; she merely purred in pride and
entire confidence.

They were wonderful kittens--two quite blue, one like its mother; their
eyes were shut, their ears were flattened down over their faces,--they
were little bodies which breathed and fed and grew.

But they _did_ grow, and their ears stood up and their eyes
opened,--dark and light blue,--and their heads got steadier, and in a
month they were little square solid kittens, who with much difficulty
could get out of the box in which they were placed. Getting out was a
process which involved the fullest exercise of all mental and physical
powers; for first they had to advance to the side, then one tiny paw
and then another was put over the side, and the adventurer was for the
time hung up by his shoulders. Then he worked himself on by the help
of much kicking behind and clawing against the box, until the part
outside was just heavier than the part inside, and with a scramble, and
by the help of the centre of gravity, the whole kitten tumbled on to
the floor. It was a grand triumph of mind over matter. And still Persis
beamed on them, and on the world in general.

[Illustration]

But as they grew began the first little rift within the lute. It was
difficult to help it. I put it to you--could one carry three kittens
and a cat about, like Henry III. of France, to exhibit to visitors.
If it was a choice between exhibiting kittens and cat, visitors would
surely prefer to see the kittens; and so it came to pass that the
children were carried into the drawing-room and handed round, while
in the empty schoolroom the “old” cat sat alone. It was only a couple
of months since she had been shown to visitors herself. Sometimes I
took her too, but that was not a great success, for everybody liked the
kittens best.

And now the kittens began to be steady on their legs, and able to
run and play, and their horizon was no longer bounded by licking and
feeding and warming; and when they once began to play, their mother
seemed rather large and rather old to play with them. Persis did not
care to play with me or cheek me any more, but she liked to gambol
with the kittens. So she played mouse in front of Pasht, but Pasht
would rather play with her brother and ran off the other way; and
she pretended to be a tiger lying in ambush to wait for Marjara, but
Marjara wished to tie herself up in a soft heap with Ganem and bite his
ears, so the Old Cat stopped in her gambols and looked at them.

Ganem was given away; and as he had been rather a favourite playfellow,
and the least favourite child of his mother, the family got on more
happily after that. Then I went away, and saw them no more for some two
months. When I came back, the Old Cat and Pasht were sent for.

They made their journey in a large hamper, and were brought up to my
room. Pasht had grown lovely; soft mouse colour with topaz eyes; but
nevertheless the meeting was a real disappointment. Persis came out of
the basket and with no greeting to me, jumped down and went to look out
of the window. What could I do? I had to play with Pasht.

I thought perhaps the cat’s temper had been upset by the journey, so I
left her alone, and some hours after came back to both of them. Persis
was lying and staring out of the window, and the kitten was occupying
the room; it ran at me, jumped and climbed up with loud purrs, and
rubbed against my face. I went to the window-sill, and still Persis did
not move; when she saw the kitten she growled a little; I put it down
close to her, on which she spit, slapped it, and fled.

So things went on. When I came into the room the kitten always ran
to greet me: it was impossible to take no notice of such a soft,
confiding, mouse-coloured creature, yet all the while I was speaking
to it two great sullen, green eyes were fixed on us, watching us round
the room. If I came there to speak to the cat, she went quickly away,
if the kitten approached her she spit, and if it came nearer, hit out
at it. Evidently the change had come in Persis from a kitten to a cat.
She was a mere domestic cat, with a not very amiable temper, she cared
no more for human beings, and had arrived at the queer alienation from
the young when they are grown up which comes to nearly all creatures;
she had had half a human soul once, but she had fulfilled the animal
functions, and she was an animal again.

Yet one or two symptoms seemed to belie this view. Once or twice,
coming into the room, I greeted her first. Then she purred until the
kitten came near, when she got up and left us hastily.

But it was difficult to see why this sullenness should so perpetually
prevail. She hardly ever forgot it. Her big green eyes had almost
always that sullen, lowering, miserable expression.

Now and then, indeed, when twilight came on, she rushed in and out of
the room, alternately defying the kitten and flying from it; but not
the most unimaginative cat on earth can resist the excitement of the
growing darkness, when the eyes flash out in amethyst and topaz, and
the pupils dilate with dramatic terror and eagerness. But twilight
deepened into dark, and candles were lighted and fairyland stopped, and
the legs of the tables and chairs ceased to be tree-trunks in a jungle,
and Persis came back to life in the schoolroom, and despair clouded
back on to her brow.

But the truth only began to dawn upon me one day. I took Persis into
my own room quite alone, and suddenly the sullen expression vanished;
I carried her in my arms and she began to purr; I put her down and she
walked up and down on the counterpane, stamping her paws and spreading
her claws,--Persis had all at once become a kitten again. She licked my
face and put two arms round my neck when I took her up. I brought her
downstairs, thinking our old relations were re-established; the kitten
came near, and Persis walked hastily away from me and took no more
notice of either of us.

Then the kitten ailed and was sent away to be nursed, and with that
curious, confused idea that creatures have, the mother felt a lack
somewhere when the object of such strong emotion was removed, even
though the emotion was only jealousy. She hunted for the kitten all
afternoon. We found her in a part of the garden which she did not
usually frequent, and she ran away with a sense of guilt when she saw
us. But when evening came, and she was in the room alone with me and
there was no kitten, I was left in doubt no more as to what it was
which was moving her. She squeezed herself in by me on the sofa, she
kissed me and purred blissfully.

And so it goes on. I have not had the heart to banish the kitten
altogether, yet when she is there I can seldom get a purr or a look
from the cat. One day I persuaded her to let me stroke her under the
ears and the throat; this is almost like mesmerism to a cat, and if one
can persuade them to let one begin, one can do almost anything with
them; and so I was gradually bringing her to a happier state of mind,
when the friendly kitten, perceiving that something sociable was going
on, came up to share in it. They met face to face as Persis took turns
up and down under my hand. They looked at each other for a moment, then
she slapped the kitten in the face and fled.

What am I to do? If I keep the kitten I cannot prevent this jealousy.
Persis lives in a condition of perpetual, jealous misery; if she thinks
the kitten is sent away, or that she is exclusively favoured, then only
does she emerge out of sullenness. And yet she is not really devoted
to me; she is only a complete egoist, and cannot be happy unless I am
devoted to her. After all, am I not bound to her? Was she not once my
sole and only cat, carried about, exhibited to company, hunted for
if she got lost? And yet Pasht is much fonder of me than Persis ever
was; Pasht will run after me, while Persis wishes to run away and be
fetched back. Pasht comes to meet me when I come into the room, cries
to be picked up, purrs as soon as I touch her; but when I do so, those
green, miserable eyes watch me, and Persis will allow no caress which
is not offered to her first.

What shall I do?

[Illustration]




II

CLANDESTINE CORRESPONDENCE


The last week has been an arduous one; I have had to chaperon Pasht.

Pasht has experienced her first proposal. I suppose it is no wonder,
considering her age, that she was flattered; but I could wish that she
had fixed her affections on anyone less vulgar and under-bred.

This was how I found it out. Pasht had been for many days very eager
to go into the garden. One morning we were playing croquet on the
lawn, and I paid no attention to the kitten, until suddenly I looked
up to see her lying on the path, her long thick hair fluffed out, her
sweet mouse-coloured cat’s visage resting on the edge of the grass,
her little chin rubbing against it, and her long squirrel tail lazily
sweeping and thumping the gravel.

At first I thought it was only flirtatiousness in general, an attempt
to captivate the universe at large, when lo! out of the laurels
opposite to her flashed an ordinary, vulgar, ill-bred, short-haired
tabby cat, who stood there for a moment, looked at me and disappeared.

[Illustration]

I was very much shocked, picked up Pasht and shut her up in the
schoolroom, when she instantly appeared on the window-sill and
reproached me loudly. But of course I did not take it seriously, and
thought that they would both get over it.

I must explain the position (unfortunate in this respect) of the rooms
in which the cats and I live.

It has four large windows looking on the lawn and the laurel
bushes--too high for a cat to jump down, but not too high for her
to practise little wiles on the window-sill for the benefit of
appreciative spectators below. Just on the left hand of the door is a
long window, from which steps go down to the garden, and close by the
steps is a large laurustinus, a most convenient place for ambushes
and clandestine meetings. Opposite the schoolroom door, again, there
is another door opening on to a back staircase, whence one gets into
kitchens, whose windows also give on to the lawn, and are usually open.
My bedroom is above the schoolroom.

On the evening when I had abruptly stopped Pasht’s flirtation, a noise
arrested my attention as I was going to bed. It was the voice of a cat
saying “wwoww.” You know what it means when a cat says that? He is
paying compliments. The noise went on and on, round the schoolroom-end
of the house, until I went to sleep, but I heard no answer from Pasht.

Pasht was hysterically affectionate when I saw her next morning; she
said “a - - - ow,” and clung on to my dress, and climbed up on to my
shoulder and refused to leave me, and walked about over my letters when
the ink was wet, and flapped her tail into my mouth, and altogether
played the fool, and pretended that she had forgotten her vulgar
suitor of the night before and I heard no serenades outside.

[Illustration]

But in the middle of the day I suddenly heard from my bedroom an
extremely loud voice saying “wwaughwow,” and looking down saw Pasht
standing on the window-sill of the schoolroom. I don’t know whether she
said it or not, for as soon as she saw me she looked up and took to the
more ordinary and ladylike expression of a general desire to go out in
the sunshine. Several times in the day I heard it again, but as soon as
I looked round, Pasht turned an innocent face to me and said “miaow.”

In the evening the gentleman began to woo again; I knew it was the
suitor this time, as Pasht was safely shut up. I listened at the door
of the schoolroom to hear if she was answering, but there was no sound.
She _is_ a regular flirt.

A party from the house went round the garden with croquet mallets, but
with no result.

Next morning it became too clear that Pasht was encouraging her suitor;
he rushed away from the laurestinus bush as I came out, and she was
sitting on the window-sill. I took her out for a short time in the
garden under strict supervision, but she would do nothing but flop into
graceful attitudes on the lawn. I really had not thought it of her.

I took her in again, and argued the point a little.

I told her that she was behaving in a very vulgar and forward manner,
and that no nice Tom would respect her. She merely looked up in my face
and said “a - - - ow.”

Then I said I would not have made any objection if he had been a
gentleman, but he was so exceedingly common and ill-bred.

But she still looked with pathetic topaz eyes, and opened a little pink
mouth with a deprecating mew.

I felt much as if, “with a little hoard of maxims,” I was “preaching
down a daughter’s heart.”

And what was worse, it did no good. Every time the door was opened,
however much Pasht was pretending to be devoted to me, she suddenly
found she had urgent business in the kitchen, and flew downstairs;
and when I, knowing the nature of the little flirt, did not go down
to the kitchen at all, but straight out of the long window on to the
lawn and found her there, she looked up with the most innocent face
possible,--“Yes; after all, I see you enjoy the sunshine as much as
I do.” When, in spite of kicks and struggles, I carried her in, she
never once said “wwoww,” but merely gave vent to the emphatic mew which
means, “_I don’t want to go in._”

I took her an airing in my arms that day, but it was extremely
exhausting, and I covered my dress with long hair.

And all that night the cat mewed.

Another exploring party went from the house with shovel and tongs.

I couldn’t stand it any longer. Pasht was sent away to a very strict
boarding-school system at the farm.

A week after, when the strange cat had ceased to howl round the house,
she came back again; but as soon as the schoolroom door was left ajar,
the urgent business in the kitchen claimed her, and Pasht disappeared
for many hours.

Poor little Pasht, were you disappointed that no one met you in the
garden to flirt with, or wanted to bounce out of the laurel bushes and
exhibit his masculine beauty before you? Or, after all, is your little
heart as hard as I think it, and do you prefer a nice warm room, a lawn
to romp on, someone in whose lap to lie, who will gently ruffle your
throat and ears--do you really, deep down in your heart, prefer these
beyond all lovers whatever?

Anyhow, when Pasht appeared at the long window, she had a gay, innocent
little air on, and she ran in saying, “You see, the fine weather _did_
tempt me to stay out rather long,--where is my breakfast?”

Never mind, little Pasht; we will arrange an honourable alliance some
day with a gentleman of rank.




[Illustration]

III

IN THE BOSOM OF THE FAMILY


Is it not true that there is a very general want of recognition of
family-life among domestic animals? It is a great mistake to suppose
they are incapable of it; often, as a matter of fact, they do not lead
domestic lives, for the simple reason that people will not let them.
If, for instance, you won’t keep a whole family of cats, how can you
expect them to develop domestic affections? We talk of their being
“domesticated,” but we mean that they are made a part of our domestic
arrangements, without being allowed to have any of their own; yet they
are quite as capable of it as we are. Of course their domesticity does
not last long, naturally and necessarily not, because they have not
one family but a series of families, and one family must be dismissed
before the next is taken on; so domestic affection developes into
murderous desires. However, I must say that in all experiences I have
personally had of cats, guinea-pigs, rabbits, dogs, goats, and birds, I
have only known one murder, and that was by an uncle.

Rector was allowed to have all his family about him. His wife was
decidedly under-bred. He was called Rector, in fact, because he would
not catch the mice, and had to have another less aristocratic but more
useful cat to help him. The curate was called Jenny. She was a low-bred
tabby. Rector could not help despising Jenny, and if anything vexed him
he used to bite her badly; but she was a very meek drudge, and took it
as a matter of course. Rector was white, with blue eyes, so we only
kept the white kittens, some of which were blue-eyed, and _not_ deaf;
blue-eyed or not, Rector used to take them out walks in the evening.

The four--papa and mamma and two kittens--used to proceed together to
the mound near the pump, and Jenny then left them, to crouch in the
bushes,--this for a purpose of her own.

Then began the game. Rector rolled the kittens over and played with
them gently, until all three became a little excited; then, if Rector
got carried away, and bit or scratched his infant till it squeaked,
out bounced Jenny from the bushes to deal him a handsome box on the
ear; and, having thus admonished her husband to take better care of the
children, she retreated again to the shelter of the yew-trees.

If you keep a whole family, you will find that there is not only
a parental, filial, brotherly, and sisterly relation, but also a
grand-parental. When Midge had some white kittens, Jenny, whose
under-bred offspring had been put out of the way shortly before, helped
her to nurse them, with as much pride and perhaps more solicitude than
Midge herself showed. It was a most charming scene. We went to see the
family soon after the birth of the kittens, and found Midge, in the
rôle of the interesting young mother, leaning back upon Jenny. Jenny
put a paw round her, while they surveyed--the mother languidly and the
grandmother proudly--the squirming white family.

But it is not cats only who have these strong domestic ties; almost
every animal shows the same thing in a greater or less degree.

We inherited, on changing our home, a beautiful pair of swans. The
first year that they became ours they had four cygnets, and brought
them up extremely well. It is true that when they were full grown, the
cock-swan, if one may use such an expression, tried to kill them; but
that was only natural, they had become his rivals. They were variously
disposed of: one was taken up to a pond in London, from which, not
being properly pinioned, he escaped, and kept a cockney crowd for an
hour well amused on London Bridge by flying over it and swimming under,
after which he--or, as he could not possibly be caught, the abstract
idea of him--was presented to the Thames Conservancy.

So far, this doesn’t seem to have much to do with the swan’s idea of
home, but, as some candid preacher said, “You may think this has not
got much to do with my text, but I’m coming to it presently.”

The swans lived on in peace and happiness through the autumn and
winter, but in the spring, when they ought to have been nesting, some
wicked boy hit the lady swan on the head with a stick, and she sickened
and died.

For some time the widower was left solitary; then we thought this was
rather cruel, and busied ourselves in getting a mate for him; and a
fine young swan was procured. When lo! it was found that the old
fellow would not let his young companion come into the pond. We thought
it would “wear off,” and left the young one to its fate; and many times
we passed the pond to find the poor young thing squatting sadly on the
road, and the widower swelling up and down.

Then we found there was a slight mistake, the young swan was a
cock-swan also.

So we changed him, and got a real lady instead. This time he would
just let his companion come into the pond, but oh! she had a bad time
of it there; he pulled her feathers out, and he drove her away from
the bread; but it had to be gone through,--it was his way of showing
constancy, and it turned out all right. She is treated now with as much
respect as his first wife.

But she was a very young wife; so, when she had hatched three eggs
into cygnets, her pride knew no bounds. The father, getting into his
dotage, encouraged her in her maternal follies. The cygnets were fine
healthy birds, but the two old birds took them out walking to such an
extent that one by one they died. No one quite knows why. Some say that
there was not enough grass by the pond, and the parents took them to
find grass; and some say that parental vanity wished to display such
flourishing offspring; but anyhow, the fact remains that the cygnets
took walks with their parents till they died. There is nothing more
domestic than the family walk.

But now contrast this domestic affection with the melancholy fate of
the inebriate swan.

A clergyman’s wife kept one swan, and the swan, no one knows how, got
into the habit of going to eat malt at a public-house. If he had done
this within bounds it would not have mattered, but he got regularly
intoxicated, and every evening reeled homewards. His mistress tried to
reform him, but to no purpose; and she tried to shut him up, but he
got out; and she used to meet him coming home with rolling, uncertain
step and hanging head. She wept, for it was such a bad example to the
parish; but that had no effect on him. At last, one evening, he was run
over and killed while reeling home in a state of intoxication.

Now, how far more melancholy is such an end than that of the three
infants killed by family affection! I would rather die three times over
from walking with my family than once from intoxication.

What is the moral? Do not break up the family too early. The presence
of the children (up to the age when he wants to kill them) will have
a softening and steadying effect on the manners of the father; while
who knows what stores of masculine experience he may not impart to his
children up to the time when they wish to fight him.

Besides all this, it is really much more amusing.




[Illustration]

IV

CHANCE ACQUAINTANCE


How vividly one sometimes retains for years the memory of a chance
acquaintance--a person whom one has met but once, passed in the street,
talked to for half an hour, whose name one may not even know.

A friend of mine was travelling in Persia, and as she and her brother
were resting in a caravansarai after a journey, they saw a Persian
gentleman beckoning to them from the garden. They went down to him, and
he asked them to come and have supper with him. They came, and found
the bread laid out, plate-wise, and the roast meat on it. They ate and
talked to him, and after their meal went on their journey. They never
asked for nor heard his name, nor he theirs,--they will never meet
again; but that Persian gentleman will be as vivid to them until the
day of their death as a friend of years.

Such memory of a mere passing chance acquaintance is not confined to
human beings. Sometimes one meets animals for an hour or two, sometimes
one accidentally lights upon them in a crisis of their lives,--such
even as their death,--and one suddenly and unexpectedly understands
and knows them. Some people and animals one never gets near. You may,
for instance, sit opposite people in church for years, know all their
Sunday dresses and hats, and how much they give in the offertory,
and be not a bit nearer to them in the end than at the beginning.
Such is the acquaintance one has with caterpillars; they are always
just the same; they eat and grow and become cocoons, and reappear as
butterflies, and there is no character from beginning to end. That is
partly why they are such excellent symbols.

Then there are some animals that have no sense of intimacy; they
let you into all their domestic relations,--their committees, their
politics, and so forth, at once; for the reason that they have only one
side to their character. They have established a Platonic Republic;
they do their domestic duties on the scale of the commonwealth,
have a universal nursery and government education. In spite of their
monarchical arrangements, they are real socialists at heart,--they
care for nothing but the good of the State. Even those that live in
a tiny community, two or three together, have no real individuality.
Have you ever found one of those tiny round nests, like ashes of paper,
which apparently grow on a stalk, and in which two or three yellow and
black tree-wasps live? It is the easiest thing in the world to scrape
acquaintance with those wasps; kill an ordinary housefly and give it to
them. They will take it from your fingers, and, without the slightest
shame at “talking shop” in public, will roll it into a neat, hard,
black ball, crushing up legs and wings alike, and stow it away inside
the nest.

But the want of intimacy characteristic of many insects is not
characteristic of insects _as such_. I once attended a grasshopper
crisis. There was nothing professional about the grasshoppers; they
did not not “spend themselves in leaps ... to reach the sun.” They did
not think the least bit in the world about the sun, they were merely
private individuals--courting. Grasshoppers’ courting is an organised
affair. I saw it in Switzerland on a soft, sunny afternoon, when the
hotel population was divided between the Roman Catholic Church on the
right and the English Church on the left, and the steps of the hotel
between the two. As I dawdled along by a bank of bilberry just turning
red, the grasshoppers were singing loud among the stalks of heather;
suddenly I was aware that they were not singing aimlessly and jumping
without purpose, but that they were intently engaged. It was like the
old fairy-story, when a child falls asleep on a bank, and wakes to find
himself surrounded by fairies intent on preparation for the marriage
of the king. The large limp ladies were sprawling about ungracefully,
and in front sat their small, spry gentlemen singing away. Here was a
green gentleman serenading a brown lady, and I wondered at his taste;
presently she got up and ran away. Clearly that was part of the drama;
it was the genuine “flirtatious” instinct of avoiding a plain answer on
purpose to provoke pursuit; for the gentleman does not jump, but runs
after her to bring her back. When lo! a green lady is seen crossing
the path, also coyly escaping from a suitor, and the faithless swain
is captivated all in a moment by the green charms, and deserts his
brunette to pursue her. Further on--astonishing sight!--is a young
ladies’ school, just “come out”; fourteen or fifteen green and brown
ladies, shy and awkward, scrambling down the bank and all talking
together.

I never saw such courting before or since, but I shall never lose the
feeling of intimacy, for I know now that grasshoppers are not always
little machines arranged with the greatest amount of muscle for the
smallest amount of weight, or wound up to trill on in the sunshine, as
mechanically as a watch ticks, or even created to be a burden,--but
they are tiny creatures, full of emotion and insect loves, putting
their best energy into their whirring song to claim the admiration of
the languid, lovely creatures that lie lazily listening.

But sometimes one arrives at a sudden personal relation to a wild
creature, too often ended abruptly by its escape or death, and its
kinsfolk are never afterwards to one as little as before. One has
regarded it as a member of a class; henceforward one regards that class
as composed of individuals possessed of strong personal desires, needs,
emotions, not merely obeying what we call “instincts,”--meaning thereby
the mechanical impulse to eat, grub, make nests, care for young. To
take an extreme instance, perhaps you think that moles are altogether
uninteresting, merely existing for the sake of lightening the soil and
destroying the wire-worm, and, in case of undue increase, fit to make
a cap for the mole-catcher and a little skeleton to swing from a tree.
But perhaps some day you will see in the stubble, after the hay is
cut, a little black form running confusedly round and round; catch it,
and hold in your hands the soft, velvet-coated body; feel the funny,
groping snout pushing through your fingers, on the chance--however
different their touch is from the damp, delicious earth--that it will
be able to find some place where it may grub a hole and escape; realise
that you might make a pet of this small, soft thing, and then please
recognise its wild desire for liberty, and let it go.

But there are some animals which, although usually recognised as “wild
animals,” seem to have no fear whatever, except when they are being
chased; once they are in the hands of a human being they are completely
self-possessed. A friend of mine sat in a field when the hay was being
carried, and saw a little field-mouse playing about; she pursued and
nearly caught it, but it finally escaped. She came back to where she
had been sitting to fetch her umbrella, and under it was found another
little field-mouse asleep, which she caught without difficulty, carried
back, and put into a box with holes in it.

[Illustration]

She brought him in to tea that afternoon, and even at this, his first
meal, he sat up like a kangaroo on his long hind-legs, and ate bread
and milk out of a spoon. He absorbed alarming quantities of it, fell
instantly asleep, woke up after a few minutes and ate a great deal
more; but the next morning the poor little beast was found gasping,
apparently dying; and when his box was opened he would not run away.
But he presently recovered as suddenly, and again devoured much food,
and so went on through the day, though his gasping fits returned at
intervals. Next morning he died. Is it that we find these creatures
generally when they are ill?--the least touch seems to make them die.
Certainly I remember once or twice, in those joyful days when sitting
in a hayfield meant the height of bliss, that our very gentle and
amiable collie, excited by an “animal” smell, would grub open a nest of
little field-mice, and stand by delighted and smiling at his discovery,
while we came up just in time to see three or four expiring infants. He
could hardly have killed them, for he only wanted to look at them. Yet
they died.

What was it, I wonder, that killed Maximilianus? Maximilianus was a
very small shrew, and we found him running about the garden; he was
just about as long as his name. He was not the least frightened, and
we carried him about for half a day; but we found nothing he could
eat, until at last we came upon a very large, fat, orange-coloured
centipede. Maximilianus seized upon this with the utmost delight, began
it vigorously at one end, and ate it up like a radish as far as the
middle. Then he died.

We had once a visitor in the shape of a squirrel, who came uninvited,
made his abode with us for some months, and finally departed, taking
“French leave.” My mother was his guide, philosopher, and friend. He
slept in a pocket of her apron (this was in the seventies), whence
he came out to fly up the curtains and drop down, venture on to the
breakfast table, and experiment on her tea with a tiny paw. He always
ran up the curtain when he was scolded; as for instance when my father,
going to the sideboard to cut ham, found the squirrel’s head just
coming out of it, having eaten its way through from the other side.
Then, after being received in the bosom of our family, after sharing
meals with the household, after attending lessons and even prayers
(when he ran up the back of a kneeling housemaid), the skwug suddenly
disappeared without warning. A few days after, my mother was walking
in the wood, when a squirrel ran up to her, put its paw upon her foot,
looked her in the face, then turned and ran away. It was never heard of
again.

Sometimes you find animals which, though not very near and dear to
human beings, have a great influence on other animals. Our donkey
died the other day. She was a remarkable and original animal. Though
she was a fixture, taken at a high valuation from our predecessors,
her demeanour was such that we called her Jack, and thought she had
retired to a well-earned repose. Then we found she was not quite two
years old, and a lady. We were always good friends, but not specially
intimate. She and her mule-foal might come to the window for bread
and salt when the horses were not allowed on the grass; but for weeks
together she did not avail herself of this privilege, till one day a
snort was heard from outside, and the donkey’s nose was seen flattened
against the glass. Once, when my mother was walking with a friend of
hers,--not an acquaintance of the donkey,--Jack, for I cannot help
calling her so, solemnly accompanied them all the afternoon, walking
between them. But such occasional walks, and the fact that she was
amiably willing to follow anyone quite impartially for a handful of
oats, constituted the extent of our intimacy with her. Not such was her
relation to the other animals. As exclusively as my goat walked with
the cows, Jack walked with the horses. She did not, of course, consider
herself so superior to her company as the goat. She made many friends
among the horses; you might not have known it, perhaps, but neither
as a general rule would you suspect the friendship which men have for
one another by their way of behaving. If a man meets a great friend in
company, he either takes no notice of him or stands near him without
saying anything. Jack used to stand about with the horses without
saying anything, but they liked to have her near.

One morning Jack was found dead of fatty degeneration of the heart.
“I’m sure the horses miss her,” said the bailiff’s wife; “I look at
them standing in the yard, and I can see they miss her.”

Jack was buried in the orchard, and her little mule followed the body
as far as the garden-gate. But there they shut the door, and the one
mourner was left outside.




V

THE DESERTED LOVER


Ever since I was a very small child I had longed to possess a pair of
budgerrygars. There was a tradition of three live ones once in our
family, in proof whereof my nurse could point to a little stuffed
bird in its case. I used to gaze with longing at that beautiful green
and yellow creature, with the speckled back and the black and blue
feathers in its neck, sitting with a foreground of quaking grasses
and an eternal blue sky behind. There existed also, but rarely seen,
a little cardboard box containing a few of these same mysteriously
beautiful blue and yellow and green feathers, with here and there a
long strong tail or wing quill. Yes, there had been budgerrygars among
us once; there were even real live ones now in the possession of those
happy Italian women who sit at the street corners, but for me--while
I was still a child--they were inmates of that imaginary Paradise of
unattainable things, wherein might be found little wax cages of birds,
and the fluffy hollow ducks which live in confectioners’ shops and are
sold for ninepence.

[Illustration]

After I was grown up, a friend gave me one of these ducks; I have it
still, and the halo still surrounds it. When I was grown up, too, some
one gave me a pair of budgerrygars; and there followed a tragedy which
was not bargained for in the price paid.

They came down from London in a tiny cage,--a travelling cage.
Budgerrygars do not mind lack of room, it makes it all the easier for
them to sit quite close, as if they were glued together. They were
lovely little things, with their pearl-grey beaks,--wonderfully sharp
and strong those beaks are, as I know to my cost,--but they could
use them gently, and you would see one turn with a soft croon to put
straight a ruffled feather on its mate’s head.

The little gentleman had caught a cold, not much of a cold at first;
he only panted slightly as he sat near the little lady and ruffled his
feathers; but she cheered him up, and smoothed the feathers down, and
they sat side by side and looked at the world with little meaningless
grey eyes.

Their new large cage was a great excitement, and it was immense fun for
them to walk over the top, using their beak as a third leg, and that
the most reliable. And their spirits ran so high that they began to
shriek unmusically at each other when they found themselves at opposite
corners of the cage.

I am afraid we were not as careful as we ought to have been with
the little gentleman. They were so funny and pretty that they were
carried from room to room; and the cage must have been in a draught,
for the little gentleman began to puff and breathe rather hard, and
his feathers were persistently ruffled, and the little lady could not
smooth them down any more, even if she had tried.

Sympathy to the ailing, the feeble, and the weak is a very modern
virtue; strange, as civilisation shows us what an unprogressive virtue
it is. The lame and the blind were “hated of David’s soul”; animals
and savages and men of early civilisation agree with David. Now and
then you find a dog which will bring a broken-legged friend to the
hospital, a cat which brings its half-starved neighbour to eat its own
dinner,--souls of philanthropists on pilgrimage, dead or yet to be;
but the stag’s instinct of goring the sickly ones, and the wolf’s of
tearing the wounded, are the ruling instincts. The lady budgerrygar
took David’s side in the matter. She did not wish to bite her spouse,
or peck him, or pull his feathers out, but he began to be hated of her
soul.

[Illustration]

One day she would not let him sit by her on the perch; he could
hardly get up to it, yet he would have done so for the sake of sitting
close to her, for the sake of putting a stray feather straight in her
ladyship’s top-knot, of feeling the little pearl-grey bill travelling
softly over his head with a croon of affection; but she would not have
it, she drove him away from her. So he sat on the lower perch, or on
the bottom of the cage; he did not scream or croon, he just puffed his
feathers out and panted. Did David repent in respect of the blind and
lame when he said, “My lovers and friends hast thou put away from me”?

What strange rebellion against fate moved in the soul of the little
budgerrygar, what necessity of finding a lonely place to die in, what
sad desire of escaping from the mate who would no longer care for him?
It is all very well to talk of “instinct” and dismiss the case, but
how do you suppose the abstract idea of loneliness in death nerved
the failing wings and feet to seek the door of the cage, made him
squeeze through the door, such a little way open; how did it attract
him across the room and through the half-open door,--away--away--as
far as he could go from his faithless love? Did this abstract idea act
on the little budgerrygar like a machine, and move and nerve the wings
for such a flight? Or was there distress in the heart, and anguish in
the little animal soul, when he found himself ill at ease and ailing,
deserted and repulsed?

It is a work of skill and time to induce a healthy budgerrygar to leave
its cage; but this quixotic spirit found his way out of the cage for
himself, and found his way out of the room, and he must have flown
until he dropped dead. For we found a little heap of gay green and
yellow feathers in the passage,--stone-cold and stiff;--he had been
dead some hours.

Budgerrygars are very sociable birds, they cannot live alone. The
little dead bird could not. So we got a new mate for the lady, whom she
received warmly, and the pair lived quite happily ever after.

But I should like to know, in the whole scheme of things, what is the
recompense for the little deserted lover.




VI

JACK


Few people know how different one bird is from another of the same
kind. Of course we can see when one canary is green and one yellow
and one crested; but few people know that some canaries have blue
eyes, some brown, and some grey; or how different one canary is in
intelligence and character from another.

Jack was a remarkably intelligent canary; one always felt him to
be immensely superior to oneself. When he consented to sit on his
swing and allow me to swing him, he always seemed to say, “This is a
very childish game, but it appears to amuse you, and I am by nature
indulgent.” He was often very angry with me and pecked me, but I was
sure I deserved it. The only blemish I ever found in him was that
he was rather unscrupulous and ill-tempered, but then he was so
exceedingly superior that he had to find fault with the canaries and me
sometimes.

Jack was very bright yellow, with a slim, trim figure. When he was
about two years old a little wife was given to him. She was almost
white, and they looked very pretty together. Her name was Thyrsis.
We tried to call them Corydon and Thyrsis, but “Jack” suited him so
well that we were not able to change it, so they remained rather
inharmoniously “Jack and Thyrsis” to the end of their lives.

I always used to turn Jack and Thyrsis out of their cage when I was
cleaning it. One morning I did not see that the window of the room
opposite was open. They flew round the room together, then coming to
the open door they darted out of it, into the next room and straight
to the window. One instant they rested on the window-sill, then like a
flash of sunlight and moonlight they were out into the sunny garden and
trees beyond. All that day I haunted the garden, too anxious to cry,
carrying their cages about, in the vain hope that they might be hungry
or thirsty and want to come back; once I thought I saw a flash of gold,
but night fell and still the birds were out. The next day we sent the
town-crier round shouting out a reward of five shillings for them, and
the day following Thyrsis was brought back to me in a paper bag, much
exhausted but not materially worse.

I did not hear of Jack for five months.

Then a boy who lived near and kept canaries heard for the first time of
my loss, and he sent me a canary which some months ago had come through
the open window and settled on his own bird’s cage. Of course it was
Jack. He had not forgotten his way of coming towards me with wings
outspread, uttering the funny scolding noise from which he got his name.

Now by this time Jack and Thyrsis were come to years of discretion, and
it was thought that they ought to build and have young. So they were
provided plentifully with horsehair and cottonwool, and given a small
round basket in one of the cages, and we put their two cages together,
opening the door between.

They were very much delighted with the wool, and played with it a great
deal, but they seemed to have no idea of the proper use of it; if we
put it into the nest for them, they merely pulled it out again.

This became so hopeless, and I was so anxious to try to rear little
canaries, that a friend promised me another hen. She, however, forgot
what our circumstances were, and sent us a pair, who were promptly
named Jock and Mummy. I would not have Jack defrauded of his wife after
all, so Mummy was taken away from Jock and given to Jack instead. There
is not much to tell about poor Jock. He was a middle-aged gentleman,
subject to chronic asthma, and could never in that state of health have
undertaken the cares and responsibility of a young family. His cage
was always hung up near the fire, and when he was worse than usual I
gave him a tiny drop of sal-volatile in his water. He was a contented,
cheerful bird, and lived as long as with his age and asthma one could
expect.

Mummy was a crested bird, pale yellow with a green crest, rather
pretty, but in mind utterly vulgar. Of course she was far more
effective than the refined Thyrsis had ever been. She knew all about
nest building, and began at once; while the cynical and gentlemanly
Jack looked on. The pair always reminded one of an aristocratic
philosopher who had married his cook.

But one must give Mummy the whole credit of the nest; she put the moss
and hair and wool into it, she squatted herself down in it, turned
round, fluffed herself out to make it hard and round and compact; and
at intervals went to keep up her strength by taking her “dishing-up
beer” in the shape of hempseed.

Then she laid eggs quite satisfactorily, and they came out quite
satisfactorily, and one by one all the nestlings died--_not_
satisfactorily. On examining the little corpses, we found that they had
died of starvation. Jack was found guilty at the inquest, for a first
principle of domestic life among canaries is that the father feeds the
birds while they are very young. What was the reason, then, that he had
so disgracefully neglected his duty of feeding them, while his devoted
wife sat on the nest to keep them warm? There must be something more
than grandeur and cynicism to make a gentleman allow his children to
die of starvation.

At last we found out the reason--Jack was flirting with his first
love! Thyrsis’ cage was hung in Jack’s sight, and instead of feeding
his infant children, or attending to them in any way, he clung to the
corner of his cage all day and serenaded Thyrsis. We put Thyrsis out of
his sight; Mummy laid a second set of eggs, and Jack attended to them
as if he had done it all his life. It is true that he threw the eldest
out of the nest on to the floor of the cage, but there is great excuse
for that; a gentleman of refined and fastidious feelings must have had
a dreadful shock when he first saw an unfledged canary and realised
that that repulsive creature was his progeny. With all his cynicism,
he could never have imagined that anything so loathsome existed. I
don’t see what else he could have done,--I should have done it myself
in his place. From whatever point you look at them, unfledged canaries
are altogether and absolutely hideous; their brownish-pink skin is
scantily covered with hairs, little bits of flesh wave helplessly about
where their wings and legs are going to be, they have two large dark
swellings where their eyes are going to be, and the only thing that
is defined about them is a huge mouth which is almost always open and
yelling. I had to pick the canary up from the bottom of the cage, and I
still owe Jack a grudge for it, though I cannot in justice blame him.

Little canaries, when they are fledged, are as pretty as before they
are frightful. These three little birds, when they were fledged, were
all different and all beautiful. One was like her mother, yellow and
green and crested; one like his father, all yellow; and one a sort
of mixture, green and yellow and without a crest. Now a curious thing
happened: the father chiefly devoted himself to feeding the little hen,
who was like her mother; the mother (who begins to feed the birds when
they are getting fledged and do not need warmth so much) fed the little
cock like the father; and I have sometimes seen these two of their
superfluity feeding their neglected brother. He throve well on the
little attention he got.

[Illustration]

I brought up several nests-ful. We had Tweedledum and
Tweedledee,--Tweedledee’s name was subsequently changed to “Jewel” by
a little cousin to whom I gave it, and who considered it a priceless
treasure,--and Daffodil, the neglected nondescript, and Vicary, and
Roumenik, called after the Wallachian country-place of some friends
of ours; and others whose names I forget. Roumenik was the only one I
kept, he was the last hatched, and was called “the Baby” until he died
at the mature age of eight years.

There was one wonderful chicken who did not live to have a name. He
was very precocious, and died young. This was how it happened: the
misguided Mummy laid an egg in January, and in consequence, as I have
always believed, of the weather being so much too cold when it was
hatched, the bird could never get fledged; when it had already begun
to be active and of a roving disposition, it still had no feathers on.
Even sprouting wing-feathers might have broken its fall a little, on
the many occasions when it tried to get out of the nest and fell on its
back on the bottom of the cage. One day it had a fall more serious than
usual, and till evening it sat on the edge of its waterglass with its
head hanging down and its neck apparently dislocated. In the morning
I found it dead in the waterglass. So I do not know to this day which
accident it died of.

But meanwhile a sudden stirring of domestic instincts came to Thyrsis,
and she was stimulated to rival Mummy’s nest-building. I gave her a
little basket and materials for a nest, and she set to work and built
a very good nest, and sat in it for six weeks, till her claws grew long
and her legs grew weak, and there was of course no sign of an egg.
Then I took it away from her, for I was afraid she would be ill with
sitting, and it would never be the least use. Poor Thyrsis! under other
circumstances she might have proved herself, if less vulgar, quite as
effective as Mummy in building and breeding. When I had had her about
seven or eight years she died quite suddenly. Was it of a broken heart?
Had Jack’s too late attentions stirred in her the emotion of love, as
he clung to the corner of his cage, singing to her and leaving his
babies to starve?

There is just one more canary I must mention, for it had a curious name
and history. It was called after one of my relations “Uncle Arthur”;
that is to say, it was called so by myself and my brothers; for it was
supposed to be called “Arthur” by my mother and “Mr. Sidgwick” by the
outside world.

Uncle Arthur was Jack’s brother, but Jack had a monopoly of the
intelligence of the family. Uncle Arthur had been half starved when
he first came to me, and it had affected his intellect. Perhaps I had
better mention that it was not from any supposed similarity in this
respect that he was named after my uncle. He was idiotic in strange
ways; for instance, I have known him try to bathe in a draught, from
which he got inflammation of the lungs. For a long time, also, I
found it was quite safe to take him out of doors without clipping his
wings, for he was too foolish to know how to fly. One day, however,
he astonished me by suddenly flying up into the top of a tree, which
proved that his apparent powerlessness was the result of idiocy; for
when he happened, as thus at intervals, to hit upon the right way of
using his wings, he could fly quite well, though in a rather curious
manner and with a pigeon-like noise. He never seemed to want to build
nests, he never even serenaded any of the hen-birds of Jack’s family.
He had a very happy, limited life. When he was already getting old
I gave him away. I am sorry to say that his death was compassed
accidentally by his new mistress; she was so much disgusted with him
because he would not wash [he had probably forgotten how to], that she
washed him one day herself with soap and flannel. Uncle Arthur died of
it.

[Illustration]

Jack outlived all the rest. Towards the end of Mummy’s life all
illusion about her passed away; he got irritated and used to pull
feathers out of her, though he tried to make up by much affection
between times. But it was not Mummy’s fault. She was frankly vulgar
from the beginning, and Jack, with his keen perception of character,
ought to have known it.




VII

A REGULAR FLIRT


Gypsy was so called because he was bought off a gypsy-cart. A friend of
mine was attracted by his wonderful voice, and gave a half-crown for
him. Others were attracted by his voice too, with results more fatal.

He was in his first year when I had him, and it was not until the
second year that his feathers and his fascination attained their full
proportions. Gypsy was a mule, a cross between a goldfinch and canary.
His back was dark green, he had a yellowish breast with dark splashes
on it, black wing feathers, and two patches on his cheeks the colour
of gooseberry fool; and he had a reddish golden crest, which he could
raise a little when he was excited.

The next summer was beautiful weather at Oxford, and I took Gypsy there
when I went to College, though I cannot say that he aided study. If I
read, he got up a quarrel with the leaves of the book, and flew at them
as I turned them over. If I wrote, he fell into a passion with my pen,
and ran across the wet ink on my paper to peck it. And his love-affairs
were very distracting.

Gypsy’s cage used to be put all day on the window-sill; and I began
after a time to be aware that he was liable to be seized by sudden
agitations, when he fluttered backwards and forwards in his cage, with
a quick, excited note. A few days more and the cause of this agitation
became apparent; for a little goldfinch, a hen goldfinch I suppose,
came and sat upon the window-sill.

The intimacy rapidly improved; the goldfinch would come into the room
and sit on Gypsy’s cage; it made friends with a siskin and a bullfinch
in the next room, and would roost in an empty cage there at night.

Gypsy’s wing-feathers were clipped, so that I could let him walk
about out of doors. When I took him into the garden he called to his
friend, and the goldfinch dropped down by his side to take a walk with
him. Other goldfinches came sometimes, but only one constantly and
fearlessly when I was there. One day I remember Gypsy walking down the
path in front of me accompanied by three friends.

But it was not long before there was a signal of danger. The house we
were in was having some rooms added on to it, and there were workmen
about. One day when I was sitting in my room and Gypsy was having an At
Home, there was a little sound outside, and a limed stick was gently
shoved towards my window-sill. Of course I remonstrated, and of course
I was told by the workmen that they had done it entirely for my sake,
because they thought that I should like to have the bird in a cage,--I
could have caught the bird ten times over if I had wished it.

But this, I fear, must after all have been the end of the love-lorn
bird; for it disappeared suddenly, and I never saw it again.

For a long time Gypsy had no society but mine and the canaries. He did
not care for canaries, and he was mostly in a passion with me. But
after some time a pair of goldfinches was given to us, much attached to
each other and otherwise uninteresting. One day I put Gypsy in their
cage to see what would happen. In three minutes a complete change had
been worked in that happy home. Gypsy was sitting with the little
lady on her perch, whispering sweet nothings into her ear, while her
disconsolate spouse sat by himself on the perch below, meditating
pistols for two and coffee for one.

[Illustration]

I will do Gypsy the justice to say that he admired himself quite as
much as anyone else admired him. When he was held to the looking-glass
he did not fight his reflection as some animals do, he fell deeply in
love with it, and whispered to it in a tiny, sweet, wooing voice, until
it was obscured by a little circle of damp breath on the glass.

Some one may ask why, if Gypsy was so universally attractive and so
extremely susceptible, I did not provide him with a wife to himself.
Simply because it would have been no good; Gypsy was a mere flirt; he
never would have had nests and eggs and brought up families like other
birds; he was a mule-bird, and they cannot be domestic.

Gypsy had one last flickering of flirtation. I took his cage out one
day into a London garden, and sat with him under a tree, and he sang
loud; suddenly I heard a sound very unfamiliar in London, the voice
of a bird which was hopping about on the tree above. I looked up, and
through the leaves I could see that it was a little goldfinch; but it
was shy and flew away.

These mule-birds die generally very suddenly; and Gypsy died without
apparent sign of illness at about the age of ten years.




VIII

A FAITHFUL FRIEND


[Illustration]

We were called into my mother’s room one day, and shown a hamper
which had just arrived. The hamper was strangely agitated, like that
hasty-pudding in which Tom Thumb sheltered, and when it was opened out
rolled a puppy! It was a collie puppy, long haired, black, with tan
cheeks, a white tip to his tail, white collar and paws, and wholly
fascinating.

It was really a charming puppy; at present too young to sin; too young
to do anything but roll about and be petted.

He was named Watch, “for,” said the friend who gave him, “he is a sheep
dog, and you are a pastoral family”--a very pretty reason, but I think
she was also influenced by the _horlogerie_ of our namesake.

Time passed, and Watch grew older and uglier. His neck lengthened,
until his ears looked like ridiculous ornaments on the top of it, his
legs grew long and lanky, his coat grew thin, and he grew naughty. He
did not indeed eat up slippers, which is the favourite employment of
story-book puppies, but he did pull most of a cold Sunday dinner on to
the lawn, lick the butter out of the dish, and leave joints of mutton
and beef on the grass. And he had another very original, reprehensible,
natural impulse--he wished to garden. His method of gardening was to
dig up saplings from a carefully-planted hedge of yews. He knew it
was wrong, but he could not help it. When he was seen thus employed,
he fled back and sheltered himself in his stable. He was just in that
state of mind and body which answers in human beings to the condition
of rapid growth and dissatisfied temper, when sleeves retreat up the
arms, and frocks and knickerbockers up the legs, and the family seems
to be in a conspiracy for making things disagreeable to you.

So it seemed best that he should be sent to a shepherd for training.
He went, and three months passed, and we looked daily for his return;
when one morning, I was sent for to the door, where I saw, held in a
strap, a beautiful, bashful, silky collie, small and well-proportioned,
with long tail and ruff, and silk-fringed legs, ready to hide his face
against the first friend with affection. I could hardly believe it was
Watch--he was full-blown, come out!

That he should sleep in a stable any longer was a manifest
impossibility. Watch was established as a house-dog.

He was wonderfully quick and obedient; he learnt to shut the door, play
the piano, shake hands, catch things from his nose, and lie dead, in
no time. He was so gentle that one could put little animals under his
charge; the canary would stand on his head, and a kitten run between
his paws. One of our blue-eyed white kittens, granddaughter of the
formidable cat Rector, attached herself warmly to him.

But there were one or two circumstances under which he was not docile.
Soon after he came home we took him for a walk in the fields near the
town. He followed quietly; when, suddenly, he spied a flock of sheep
feeding, and up went the white tufted tail like a banner; nothing could
hold him; no threats restrain him, until from hedge and ditch he had
collected the whole flock into marching order. Much severe treatment
was necessary before we could induce him to relinquish his profession.
Then often as we went through the fields, Watch following with an eager
eye, longing to be off after a scattered flock, an old north-country
shepherd would sidle up and “pass the time of day,” and gently turn the
conversation until he could say, “I suppose that dog of yours is not
for sale?” He was right, Watch was not for sale.

He could not, it is true, quite resist the instinct of the chase; and
often one saw him flying down the garden in pursuit of the white kitten
Midge, while her old-fashioned, under-bred, good-hearted tabby mother
followed to protect her. But nothing happened; he rolled over and over
with Midge, and Jenny jumped upon the soft heap, and dealt out boxes of
the ear when Watch’s head got uppermost. Then they all got amicably up
together, and went off quite good friends. Once, I am sorry to say, he
did break the leg of a rabbit, but he was more surprised than any one
else at it. I found him another time, having caught a blackbird; he was
very much surprised and delighted, but puzzled as to the right course
to adopt next; so he made short runs at it, and pretended to bite it,
and wagged his tail very much, and asked me to come up and look at it.

As for the goat, he was a most excellent good comrade with her. He
exercised all his sheep-driving skill to fetch her when she lagged
behind. And it takes as much skill to fetch one goat as fifty sheep.
When she behaved well, he consented to go in double harness with her.
The double harness was made out of tape dyed purple with Judson’s dyes.
There was an old madman who lived in a house opposite the field where I
generally drove them. He was very fond of watching the performance.

But now I come to a part of Watch’s character which I cannot present in
such a favourable light. He was jealous.

Of course we did not find it out at first. He was not brought into
comparison with other dogs, only with inferior animals, and he
would naturally not be jealous of them. We are not jealous of our
friend’s cat and dog, but of our friend’s friends. Watch was not
jealous of our cats and birds, and goats and guinea-pigs, but of our
dog-acquaintance. Occasionally he showed slight uneasiness when a horse
or a baby was much noticed; they were rather too high in the scale of
creation--nearly at the level of dogs.

But one day there had been a dog show near us, and after the booths had
been taken down, and the exhibits gone, one poor spaniel was discovered
who had lost his friends, and appealed to us for sympathy; so we
invited him to afternoon tea in the garden. Watch came to tea as usual;
but when he saw the other dog, he suddenly became demonstratively
affectionate. This was quite appreciated; but the other dog was not
therefore neglected. So Watch bit him. This was not appreciated at all.
We told Watch so, but he only sat down and turned his back to us, and
gave the family five minutes for repentance; and as they did not fall
on their knees, and beseech his forgiveness, he solemnly marched away
into the house and lay in his master’s study, quite alone, sulking. I
am sorry to say, too, that he conceived occasionally the most violent
antipathies to the most delightful and well-intentioned people. There
was a friend of ours, devoted to dogs in general, and to him in
particular, whom he would not allow to touch him; he would not take
food from her hand; once, when he had accepted from some one else the
food he had refused from her, he stopped eating it because he heard her
laugh. Once he was the victim of uncontrollable fascination. A girl
came to tea, at whose greeting he growled; then he lay down in a corner
with his eyes fixed on her. She went on talking and taking no notice of
him, and he came out into the room, little by little, looking at her,
till he finally sat straight in front of her, with his eyes fixed on
hers; and there he remained until she went away.

Watch had become identified with the family, to the extent of being
called “Watch Benson” by many friends. His English vocabulary was
wonderfully large. I remember the surprise of one gentleman who came
to talk business with my father. Watch was in the room, and, hearing
our voices outside, suddenly started to the door, which was shut. “Why
don’t you go out of the window, then?” my father said, quite quietly,
and Watch in a moment ran to the window and jumped out.

I never quite knew what Watch’s position was towards religious
exercises. I think he approved of them, but disapproved of our
exclusiveness about them. So he pretended altogether to despise
church. He was depressed on Sunday morning, came to the garden gate to
congratulate us when church was over, and pretended to be sleepy when
the time for evening church drew near. But I think that was because he
was not allowed to go; for he took up a very different position about
prayers; he insisted on coming; he had his own stall in a window;
though occasionally, when strangers were there, and he could not be
turned out, he suddenly decided to leave it for the softer rugs in the
middle of the chapel. There was one memorable occurrence, when the 26th
chapter of St. Matthew was read, and Watch got more and more excited
as he heard his own name repeated more and more emphatically, until
at the final, “I say unto all, _Watch_,” he ran eagerly out into the
middle--such exciting, personal prayers!

But he made a great point of attending; for when we changed our
house, and came to the conclusion that his presence would no longer
be appreciated, his efforts to attend prayers were quite pathetic.
Sometimes he scratched at the door, or pushed it open, and marched in
in the middle; sometimes he slunk in when we went into the chapel, and
sometimes ran in first and tried to hide. He had a vague idea in his
mind, that it was some special privilege, some special identification
with the family.

Now that we were in London half the year, Watch could not be with us
constantly. For one thing his dirty paws were such a mortification to
him, and we thought he would die from the amount of soot he licked
off. And he could not go walks, for he would stand smiling at us in
the middle of the street, with a tram, two omnibuses, a cart, and four
hansoms, bearing down upon him. So he went to stay with friends, or
down to the farm in the country.

That last was often necessary, but not a great success. Watch was
very exclusive; he never would go walking with servants, except when
everyone else was--not out, for he might have met them--but away
from home. The one exception was when the servants were nurses with
children. He was fond of children, and did not think it _infra dig._ to
play with them. In the same way he despised everyone at the farm, and
had to be treated in a very special manner, quite different from all
other dogs. “Why can’t Watch live like any of the other dogs?” one of
the children asked. “Oh, my dear, Watch is much too good for us,” his
mother told him, with a deep sarcasm. No other dog could come on the
rug when Watch was lying there. The cat might come and was welcome, and
liked the benevolent old gentleman. Just as one would not like anybody
to come and take half of one’s armchair, but might be rather flattered
if a cat or a little dog jumped up to settle itself there. Cats were
only cats, and fit subjects for philanthropy, but other dogs were his
own ill-bred relatives. As some one summed it up, “Watch doesn’t care
for dogs.”

The other dogs could not be expected to appreciate this, and Watch’s
airs provoked at last one outburst from King, the steady old
patriarchal collie of the farm. King flew upon him one fine day to
have it out, and all the other dogs, seeing that King “had taken out a
free ticket,” as the bailiff phrased it, flew to avenge their private
grievances. Watch was very nearly killed, but he kept his airs to
the last. Such strong arguments were brought to bear upon King, that
ever after, when Watch crossed the yard, King retired promptly to his
kennel. He could not trust his own self-control, and fled temptation.

Poor King! he had a sad end. He and a young golden collie called Pat
went out together in some woods--poachers, I fear. Towards evening Pat
came back in a fearful state of agitation, trembling. The dog must
have longed for words to tell what he had seen! But they guessed it.
The gamekeeper was known to have a grudge against King, and he was
never heard of again from that day to this.

Watch had a very different end. He grew old and blind. He had to live
altogether at the farm now, but he did not mind that. He had two great
friends. One was the bailiff’s daughter, and one the niece of the
landlady at the “Cricketers,” over the way. The first nursed Watch,
the second he went to see every day. But the niece got married, and
Watch never crossed the road again, but transferred all his affection
to Katie. He was nearly blind now, quite deaf, and very rheumatic. He
had not much emotion left; it soon wearied him. I remember while he
was still at the house, that when we all came home at the end of the
holidays in two detachments, he greeted the first-comers effusively,
and then retired under the sofa, and took no notice of the second batch
until they had been in the house about an hour; then, his emotions
being rested, he came out and greeted them too with affection.

But two loves remained to the end; his love for Katie and his love
for milk pudding--and Katie generally gave him the milk pudding. He
hobbled about after her as long as he could, and sat in her room. Once
they thought him dying. He lay on Katie’s bed, and Katie was away--was
coming back that evening. His head lay on the pillow and his eyes were
closed, and they thought him dead, when Katie came upstairs and spoke
to him; and the life came back to him, and she fed him, and he lived a
few days more. Then he died, this time with Katie close to him.

He is buried by the gold-fish pond under a cedar, and he has a
tombstone and an epitaph, “_Esne Vigil_.” And the other day I passed
by, and freshly-gathered daisies were lying on it. I think Katie must
have put them there.

[Illustration]




IX

KIDS OF THE GOATS


They were Zoe and Marcianus Capello (but she was no kid), and Capricorn
and his brother, and Chat and Tan. I did not possess them all at the
same time; in fact, I never had more than three at one time, and that
was because Marcianus Capello had twins.

Zoe was the first. When she came to us she was a little white kid, just
taken from her mother; she was very pretty, with a dark mark down her
back and two little tassels of hair on her neck. But, as I say, she was
only just taken from her mother, and the first evening was full of much
trouble and care, for we could not find anything she would eat, and
we thought she would be starved. She would not be fed, moreover, with
milk, and we were in despair until we thought of trying if she would
eat the tender sprouts of may. It was early spring, and for a day or so
all her meals were taken in our arms, as we held her up to nibble at
the hawthorn hedge.

But she soon grew less fastidious, and, as goats do, would eat
anything, from garden flowers, laurel leaves, and cabbages, down to
paper and bread. She was tethered in the field, and this was very
necessary, for if she was free she would follow us everywhere, would
go walks with us out of doors, and would come into the house after us.
The chief difficulty with kids is superabundant affection; they wail
pitifully when one leaves them alone, and cannot be persuaded that
their presence is not always desirable. Some friends of ours--they were
Quakers too--used to dress up a stick with a waterproof and hat to
keep their kid company. It satisfied her completely; but was it quite
consistent with the Friends’ idea of truth?

Zoe nearly had a bad accident once, in consequence of her fondness
for coming into the house. I was sitting on the steps at the door
and playing with her, when suddenly she bounced away from me and
ran into the drawing-room. I pursued her, and she, knowing she was
wrong, ran farther, saw a way of escape, and jumped straight through a
large plate-glass window. I thought she would be cut to pieces, and
in agonies rushed outside, where I found her making the most of her
opportunities by devouring our best rose trees under the window.

Zoe lived with us for a year. Then I was kept indoors by a bad cold and
throat, and I heard that the kid was sympathising with me by having a
bad throat also. But alas, poor Zoe! her throat was much worse than
mine, and though we strapped a little blanket on her back to keep her
warm, and though the gardener and the cowman poured gruel down her
throat, when she could hardly swallow, she got thinner and weaker, and
one morning she died. I sobbed audibly all through prayers that morning.

Then a friend of mine told me that some cousins of hers were anxious
to part with a goat they had, and Marcianus Capello, otherwise called
Marcap, arrived. She was not at all like Zoe; she was a large, dull,
elderly, brown and white goat. She did not want to make friends at all;
she chiefly wanted to eat. But there was one great advantage about
her, for a few weeks after I had her she gave birth to two little twin
billygoats--two fluffy black-and-white creatures with huge legs.

Marcap was, like Zoe, tethered in the field, and it was supposed that
filial affection would keep the kids near her. The kids had a fine
time in consequence. One morning one heard a rattling over the roof of
the nursery, and found the kids were playing King of the Castle on the
house-top. Another time they came skipping out of a yard where building
was going on, covered with lime to the tops of their legs; and for some
little time we were terribly afraid that the smallest kid would lose
his eyesight, as he had splashed lime up into his eyes, and that they
both would come out of it with skinny hairless legs. A procession,
of my nurse holding a cup of milk and water, myself and my youngest
brother (who was too naughty to be left alone), could be seen crossing
the field three times a day to bathe the kid’s eyes.

When the kids were old enough to do without their mother, we gave
Marcap away. I did not mind parting with Marcap; I never should have
got fond of her, for she had no idea of intimacy. But to part with a
kid was a different matter; it took us a long time to decide that it
would be better to keep the biggest and strongest kid, Capricorn; and
we gave away the little one.

Capricorn proved just a little more warlike than it is quite convenient
for a kid to be, if you are in the habit of taking it out for walks.
In the first place, if he met a flock of sheep in a field, he would at
once begin to drive them away, running and butting after them. In the
second place, if he met cows, he would invariably have a pitched battle
with them, unless he was dragged away by main force. I have seen him in
the middle of a ring of cows, knocked down by them, and getting up to
butt them again. Thirdly, if he met a donkey, even in a cart, he would
go for it, which sometimes caused the drivers of the cart to swear.
Lastly, if he met children, he would try to awe them by standing on his
hind-legs. His wickedness gradually developed with his growth. Before
he was grown up he was a very affectionate kid. Once, when I turned
back in a walk, the rest of my family had the greatest difficulty in
inducing Capricorn to go with them. He got on very well with our wise
collie. Watch was useful in fetching him up, if he lagged behind in a
walk to carry out some of his evil designs. I had a little cart for
Capricorn, too, and made him pull up stones for a rockery we were
making; this was a good outlet for his energies, and he had less time
to be wicked.

But he finally got too fierce for us to keep him any longer. If I was
running down a hill by his side he would try to hook me with his horns,
and he was not at all to be trusted with children. I gave him away
reluctantly, and it was some consolation to hear that he nearly killed
his new master, who came upon him suddenly in the dark. Since then I
found out that it was not individual wickedness, but, so to speak,
class wickedness, and that it is rarely safe to keep a billygoat when
he grows up.

Then for some time I had no kid. After a while a lady near who kept
goats gave me two kids.

These were very pretty kids; one was quite white, the other fawn
colour, and very graceful. They would follow me everywhere; but, as I
could not keep two, Chat, the white one, was given away.

It was considerably easier to take Tan walks than it had been to take
Capricorn; for Tan did not want to fight every beast or child she met.
Watch was useful in fetching her as he had been with Capricorn. Long
afterwards, when the acquaintanceship between them was a thing of the
past, to say, “Watch, fetch the kid,” would bring her hurrying up to
us. Tan was the only one of my goats who ever learnt a trick, but I
taught her to shake hands in exchange for leaves or oats.

Then we moved from the place where we were living, and I left Tan
behind me for a child of the family who were coming into our old house.
I heard no more of her for a year, and then they wrote to me to say
that Tan was pining, and they wished that I would send for her. So she
came up by train, and the first moment she saw me she remembered me,
and we shook hands.

Tan is still alive. On misty summer mornings, one sees her pass the
windows heading a herd of cows; she is much too proud to walk with
sheep; and though she will condescend to go with cows, she keeps
herself to herself, never talks to any of them, but preserves a proud
and solitary position. On rare occasions a sudden burst of friendship
or curiosity will induce her to come into the house with me.

But my friendship with Tan, I must confess it, is not what it was;
perhaps it might never have waned if I had not consented to the year’s
separation. But although occasionally we bleat to each other from a
distance, though we shake hands over a few oats, she no longer runs
to meet me if I come near, she no longer cries out with a wailing
bleat when I go away, she no longer has to be tied up to prevent
her following me. And I do not think it is age that has made this
difference, I think it was worked by that year of separation.

[Illustration]

Passing through the farmyard on a cold day, I found Tan in the corner
where the dead leaves had blown up, and lay a foot or more deep. She
was standing in the deepest part of the heap, which came up to the top
of her legs, and had secured herself, as it were, a good hot bottle for
the night.

In conclusion, I would say that there are no pets more enchanting
than kids. They will give you as much amusement as kittens or
puppies; while they are as intelligent as grown-up dogs, and even more
wildly devoted. But there are two things you must never expect of a
goat,--neither the least unselfishness in their affection, nor the
smallest spark of benevolence.




X

COMMUNITY LIFE


Our old cowman Callaway was Cornish; he taught me to milk; he took a
fatherly interest in my animals; he talked Cornished English, and I
understood about a quarter of what he said. He had a wife who worked in
the house of a neighbour of ours, and a very elegant daughter. I never
could imagine how her hats and jackets and dresses got into the hovel
in which the family lived; however, I suppose they must have got into
it, for they certainly came out.

[Illustration]

The wife’s employer’s daughter kept guinea-pigs; and Callaway promised
to get us a white one. In due time he appeared with it. But to our
delight, when the box was opened, out came two little white creatures,
with shining red eyes, not weak bluish-pink eyes, but real good red
ones like little jewels. They were named Ixtlilxochitl and Atahualpa,
and installed in a wooden house with a wired-in yard under the laurel
trees of the drying-ground. Here they rapidly became naturalised;
burrowing under their wire fence, they found the way to the long,
fresh grass beyond, and enjoyed as much liberty as they wished till
nightfall, when the wooden slide of their house shut them safe from
dogs and rats and cats.

I had many sympathisers in my amusements. Not only was there Callaway
the cowman, who became house-builder to the community, but my old nurse
used to take the guinea-pigs a breakfast of soaked bread every morning;
and we had a butler sagacious about animals, to appeal to as a highest
authority on all difficult questions. So when, one morning, I opened
the slide, to find two new white things about as big as large mice
gaily running about, the first thing I did was to run to the servants’
hall and summon the butler to advise in this difficult and delicate
situation. Ixtlilxochitl was sent to a new hutch, hastily erected for
him, and Atahualpa kept house for the babies.

This was very good for the development of Ixtlilxochitl’s character.
He became very tame, learnt to sit up with his forepaws on my finger,
and to “lie dead” on his back with his little pink hands and feet in
the air; guinea-pigs’ forefeet are really small pink hands, with short
claws on the fingers, and a rudimentary thumb.

Guinea-pigs grow up very soon; they have no helpless infancy at all.
I have heard of a guinea-pig eating bran twenty minutes after it was
born. I know we used to carry the infants about and let them run up our
sleeves till they stuck, and had to be pulled back by their hind-legs;
and though I would not recommend this practice, they never seemed to
take any harm from it. Then, when they are about three months old they
become heads of families. At first the family only consists of one or
two members, but they increase in number until each family numbers
seven or eight. You may expect a new family once every six or eight
weeks. There is a nice sum in geometrical progression! And after this
general statement of the matter you will hardly expect me to give
you a history of each individual, though I made a chart of their
genealogies. I will, however, give a short biographical notice of the
most interesting characters.

The first two were Ulfias and Brastias. Ulfias was a nice, comely
guinea-pig; he took after his father, and had brown whiskers. Brastias
had pink ears, which were generally much bitten, and fierce red eyes;
he was an ill-conditioned, cross little beast, and a great fighter.
Moreover, he was a murderer.

[Illustration]

It is the funniest thing in the world to see guinea-pigs fighting.
They stand on the tips of their toes and raise their noses, until they
present the chin only to their adversaries; then they begin to dance
round, always chin to chin, gnashing their teeth; when they see a good
opportunity they fly in and bite. It is a scientific way of fighting,
like wrestling or fencing--quite different from the indiscriminate
plunge of a cat, who rolls round in a heap with her adversary.

After these two came Enid, Elaine, and Geraint. Enid was the first to
have a baby, and she had only one--a fat round one, which grew and
prospered until one day when he suddenly disappeared. We searched and
hunted with anxious hearts, but with no result. After a time we wanted
to move the hutches to a new place, and when we took up that in which
poor Enid and the baby lived, there was a hole under it--a rat’s hole,
and at the end of the hole, as we peered down, we saw a little white
thing--the skin and bones of a baby guinea-pig. Enid never had another
baby; she grew sad and thin and pined away, and at last she died.

Then Elaine had a baby--two; but one was deformed, completely paralysed
in his hind-legs, and I felt that the kindest thing to do would be to
destroy him. So I took out a bottle of laudanum, and prepared to begin
the hari-kari. Poor little guinea-pig! it was already very ill, and I
could with difficulty get its little rabbit-like mouth open. What a
tiny throat! could it swallow even enough poison to end its panting
little life? When I laid it down again there was very little change,
and I did not know what to do; then the pink nose, the hands and feet,
began to have a slightly blue tinge. I could not disturb it again to
open its mouth, so I poured a little more laudanum on its mouth and
nose, and the limbs got bluer, and the breathing became harder, and at
last ceased. It was a dreadful thing to do. However, on the whole, it
was less dreadful than drowning it. Once I had to drown a bat.... We
will draw a veil over that.

However, to proceed with the guinea-pigs. The baby that was not
deformed was a very nice little pig--small but comely. He grew up and
was called Jim.

There is an individuality about guinea-pigs, not explicable but to be
apprehended intuitively. Jim was quite individual. You would have known
that if you had only seen him sitting upright at his mother’s side to
nibble out of the hay trough.

The guinea-pigs lived in a large estate fenced in by wire; inside the
yard were various settlements, bedrooms, all with free access to the
yard, and usually to the ground beyond, for they made holes under the
wire and disported themselves outside. They had a beautiful rack to
hold their hay, saucers for bran, and were given a breakfast of soaked
bread every morning. At breakfast-time shrill whistles might be heard
from the guinea-pig yard. Most people think guinea-pigs have only
one noise, but in reality they have, quite clearly defined, three
fundamental notes, of desire, contentment, and anger. They whistle when
they are hungry, make what are called “guinea-pig noises” when they are
well content--for ordinary conversation, and they gnash their teeth
when they are angry.

About this time, when the colony was not too large, I used to take them
out for picnics.

Opposite the front door, at the corner of the lawn, there is a large
escalonia tree; on warm summer evenings it sheds a delicious fragrant
smell from leaves and flowers. Opposite this there is a stile made to
get into the fields. The stile is made in such a manner as to be a very
comfortable seat. Here, under the escalonia, I used to turn out the
guinea-pigs for a day in the country, while I read a book on the stile,
and Watch was put to guard them; if any little pig strayed too far, he
saw where it went to, and helped me to find it again.

But, in time, the colony grew too large for this, and at last it began
to increase with a rapidity that alarmed me; for, as you see, it is not
a case of the simple geometrical progression of creatures which have
the same number in every family; but, as guinea-pigs get older, each
family gets larger, so that it is like a sum in compound interest, at
an accelerating rate of interest. I began to be frightened when the
“five Mitchinsons” were born, and the next family was larger still.

In fact, they would have eaten us out of garden and farm, if it had not
been for what political economists call “violent checks”; these violent
checks were kidnapping, nepoticide, and massacre.

Kidnapping was the first check. Our house was being added to, and there
were various workmen about, and one morning when I visited the hutches,
Daisy and Ally Mitchinson were missing. There is no more to say about
it; they were never seen again. I felt like a mother, who, having
complained of the burden and size of her family, is deprived of one of
them.

But that was not the worst. Atahualpa was still flourishing, although a
great-great-grandmother. One morning I found reason to seclude her from
the rest of the community, and by an arrangement of hutches, I shut off
a little yard for her by herself.

I came back a few hours later, and I found Brastias had displayed
himself in his true colours at last. He had leaped the barrier, and
was standing with gory mouth and fiery eye, over the carcase of a baby
guinea-pig. In another corner of the hutch was Atahualpa, behaving with
the supremest indifference to six more.

That day I gave away sixteen guinea-pigs. But I believe that we should
have had a repetition of Bishop Hatto, if it had not been for the last
check--namely, massacre.

We were overrun with rats, and rat-catchers were sent for. One morning
two men came up with their dogs. The men were looking at the rat-holes,
and arranging a plan of campaign, when suddenly they found that the
dogs were not with them. Across the wall which separated the cow
stables and haystacks from the garden and guinea-pig yard, they heard a
doleful noise. They ran round, and found that the dogs had been doing
their duty nobly, and all the guinea-pigs but two lay dead on the
ground.

The victims were buried in a large grave, and my brother found a
suitable slate and wrote a Latin epitaph on it. He put it up as a
headstone, and enjoyed the proceeding very much.

But I did not enjoy it. I had not the heart to keep guinea-pigs any
more. I gave away the two survivors, and the hutches mouldered away,
and cucumbers grew over the yard, and only the genealogy and the
tombstone were left as memorials of that very large family with the
white coats and jewelled eyes.




[Illustration]

XI

FINISHED SOLOMON


King Solomon was journeying through a thirsty land--sand beneath his
feet, sand around as far as a man could see, above the pitiless blue
sky. No tree could grow here, and no rock was there to cast its shadow
on the sand. “What shall shield me,” said the king, “from the fury of
this sun?” Then was heard the sound of light wings beating the air, for
all creatures knew the voice of the words of King Solomon; and there
came through the air a cloud of hoopoes, and they spread their barred
wings, and closed them together, wing to wing, and they shielded King
Solomon. So, when the toilsome journey was over, the king called the
hoopoes, and said, “O hoopoes, what will ye that I give you for your
service done to me this day?” And the hoopoes said, “O King, give us
crowns of gold”; and the king gave the hoopoes crowns of pure gold.

But men hunted the hoopoes through the length and breadth of the land,
and they killed them for the sake of their golden crowns; then the
hoopoes cried to King Solomon, for King Solomon knew the voice of all
beasts and birds, yea of the creeping things also, and the hoopoes
said, “Take away our crowns, O king, for men kill us for the sake of
our golden crowns.” And Solomon took away their crowns. “Yet,” said he,
“it shall be known what the hoopoes did for the King,” and he gave them
crowns of golden feathers.

       *       *       *       *       *

So says the _Book of the Enchantments of the King_, and that is why my
hoopoe was called Solomon.

       *       *       *       *       *

I was riding through a village near Thebes in the evening, and among
the groups of children who held out grimy hands and cried “Backsheesh”;
and the half-blind boys who made the somewhat startling statement,
“Finished Fazzer, finished Muzzer, I yam berry hongerry”; I saw at the
door of a mud house three children, one of whom swung towards me a bird
he held by the wings,--and I recognised the helpless, half-dead, fluffy
mass for a hoopoe.

I refused to give them the wages of sin, and they were too much
surprised to attempt to hinder the departure of the hoopoe. Indeed, if
they had kept it much longer, it would have departed without assistance
by the silent road, for one claw had been tied back to its leg, and it
had been swung in that manner till its tormentors happened to think
that they had better try the wings instead; its crown of feathers had
been pulled out; and when I got back to the hotel, it shut its eyes
and fell forwards on the point of its beak as if it was about to die.
The string had been tied so tightly that it was with difficulty that
we got it free from its bonds, and then we plied it with whisky and
water. That was no easy matter either, for it would not open its mouth,
and one had first to get the long beak open, and then to hold it so,
while from a feather dipped in the refreshing beverage a drop trickled
down the pink throat; then the bill was shut, and one watched to see
if the feathers of the throat would ruffle and give sign that the
drop was passing down. The method succeeded, for presently the little
forked tongue was shot out to suck up the liquid, the little brown
eyes opened, and the hoopoe, taking in the situation, hurried into the
corner of the window-sill, and supposed that he was hiding himself by
laying his long bill up the wall.

It would certainly be necessary to provide the hoopoe with a
habitation, were he only the guest of a day; so a crate which had
contained pottery was found, its straw was arranged nestwise, and the
bird was bestowed in it, much to its own satisfaction.

But the diet was a problem. Its natural food was live insects. I went
so far as to kill a housefly, but it was a very disgusting process, and
the fly was not at all well received; moreover, I was not sure whether
the hoopoe was of an age to receive, shall I say _peptonised_ food from
his parents, or whether he preferred the raw material. But as the best
compromise, including the carnivorous and the more-or-less-peptonised
element, I decided on hard-boiled egg; that had to be administered in
the same way as the whisky, with drops of water to help it to run
down. After this I put the hoopoe into the crate for the night.

I frankly confess that I expected to find a stiff little body there in
the morning, but instead I saw a bright brown eye fixed upon me, and a
smooth, compact, though crownless little hoopoe, sitting in the straw.

If the hoopoe was going to live, other things became necessary--first
and foremost, a name.

[Illustration]

The name suited him exactly. From the time that he was called Solomon,
he _became_ Solomon. We never spoke of him as the hoopoe; indeed, it
is with great difficulty that I have avoided so far using his name.
Now I have told you when and why he was named; henceforth, then, he is
Solomon.

But, secondly, Solomon must have exercise, and fresh animal food. It
would be better, both for the sake of digestion and economy of time, if
the two could be combined, and I spent most of my time in effecting the
combination in one of the garden beds.

The beds in the hotel garden are excellently convenient for feeding and
exercising half-fledged hoopoes; they are lowered three or four inches
below the level of the paths, for the purposes of irrigation. Thus
when, once a week, the water is turned in, the beds become a series
of pools, until the water has gradually soaked away through the rich
black mud. Further, the beds are surrounded with a bushy little plant,
so that when Solomon tried to spring over the edge and escape me, his
wings were not strong enough for the purpose; he sprawled on the bushy
plant, wings spread and legs kicking, and was easily captured.

But it was Sunday, and the hour drew towards church time. Solomon must
go home and be fed before I went to church. Accordingly, I went to
catch him, but there was one thing I had forgotten. At the corner of
the bed was a drain through which the irrigation was effected. Quick as
thought Solomon ran in there, and was out of arm’s length in a minute.
What was to be done? The bell was already ringing to church; decent
and godly people, with their prayer-books in their hands, were walking
down the garden path; and there was I plunging round the drain in
search of an ungrateful, half-fledged, discrowned hoopoe. I dared not
leave him there, to be the prey of the numerous and ravenous hawks and
crows.

But suddenly, as a _Deus ex machina_, Mahmoud the gardener hove in
sight; so I called to Mahmoud, and Mahmoud called to Ibrahim, and
Ibrahim brought a dry palm leaf, and we put it in at the opposite end
of the drain, and made a very terrible shaking noise in the inside with
it; and there hurried out a very long beak, supported by a very small
bird at the end of it; and Solomon was captured in time for church.

When I came back from church, Solomon’s crate was empty. We trod
carefully over the room for fear of squashing him flat, like a
botanical specimen; we looked under the sofa, under the chairs, and
Solomon was not there. Then a little scuffling noise on the balcony
attracted our attention, and there was Solomon with a guilty look in
his face. We lined the inside of his crate with stiff newspaper.

But when I came back from lunch I saw a ridiculous silhouette far up
the half-lighted passage. There again was Solomon! He had carried on
mining operations on the paper during lunch, and had escaped again.
Another crate with narrower bars had to be procured. Of course he
instantly put his head through and got it fixed, and I had to seize him
by the beak and push him back.

[Illustration]

Now, by all the laws of animal literature, Solomon ought to have been
devoted to me by this time. If he had studied the _Whole Duty of
Birds_, he would have found out that he must wake me at dawn (I cannot
feel sure that I should have appreciated that); that he must flutter
his wings with joy and chirp when I came into the room, even if he did
not feel equal to opening his little bill and pouring forth a grateful
song (do hoopoes sing?); that he must follow me round the room; that he
must eat out of my hand; that he must beat his breast against the bars
of his cage when I went away.

Solomon did none of these things. He shut his beak tightly when I
wished to feed him, he pecked at me when I tried to open it, he ran
away when I attempted to catch him, he struggled when I had got him,
he hurled himself from my hand into the crate as soon as possible, and
he did not like me at all.

By the third day Solomon had immensely developed. People who had
considerately told me that it was impossible to rear a hoopoe, now
foretold that he would live. He extended his mining operations to the
garden. I am not sure that he found any insects, but he did great
execution on the loose earth at the foot of the palm-tree. He looked
quite like a real grown-up hoopoe when he ran about the garden bed and
dug his bill in up to its roots; and in the evening he flopped off the
window-sill while I was feeding him, and had a grand race round the
room.

That night I dismissed the fear of finding the little cold corpse in
the morning.

But when I opened the shutters and looked at Solomon in the morning,
he was not awake; his head was tucked behind his wing. I took him out,
he looked round dreamily, and sank on to the ground. I got whisky and
water again, and fed him with a feather; he pecked and struggled at
first, but presently he allowed me to open his beak, and I saw that the
little pink mouth was getting very white. Still I gave him more, hoping
it would have the same reviving effect as at first. But presently
Solomon dropped his beak on the window-sill, and the drop trickled down
it again, for he had stopped swallowing. He laid his head down, and
stretched out his little black claws; and heaved gently once or twice;
and no more.

As the Arabs say, it was “Finished Solomon.”

[Illustration]


MORRISON AND GIBB, PRINTERS, EDINBURGH




Transcriber’s Note:

Attempts have been made to produce this eBook as a faithful reproduction
of the original publication, preserving spellings including “anyrate”,
“developes” and “skwug”; and the alternative spelling of “laurustinus”
and “laurestinus”.



*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SUBJECT TO VANITY ***


    

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.


START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
    at www.gutenberg.org. If you
    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
  
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

    • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
        the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
        to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
        Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
        Literary Archive Foundation.”
    
    • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
        works.
    
    • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
        receipt of the work.
    
    • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
        distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
    

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.