The Reaction Between Manganese Dioxide and Potassium Permanganate

presented for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
to the Board of University Studies
of the Johns Hopkins University

The work recorded in this paper is the result of a suggestion given by Professor H. N. Morse. It has received his careful attention throughout its course. For his instruction and exact criticism, I wish to offer my acknowledgment and thanks. I wish also to express to Professor Ira Remson my appreciation of his interest and instruction and to offer to Dr. J. S. Ames my thanks for his instruction in Physics——

The usual laboratory solution of potassium permanganate must be frequently restandardized. A slight loss in strength may be detected after standing even a few days and this change becomes more rapid as the decomposition proceeds. When one looks for the cause of this increase in the rate of the decomposition of the permanganate, the attention is naturally directed to the brown manganese oxide which [Pg 2] separates from the solution. A desire to ascertain whether the presence of this oxide influences the rate of the decomposition suggested the experiments here described.

The fact that potassium permanganate may react with certain so-called peroxides with evolution of oxygen, has long been known and it appeared possible that a similar reaction may take place between manganese dioxide and potassium permanganate.

Morse and Allen investigated the reaction between lead dioxide and potassium permanganate and there is embodied in Allen’s dissertation[1] a statement of the earlier work in this line with references to the literature on the subject. [Pg 3]

They have shown that in the presence of a quantity of dilute nitric acid which is equivalent to the potassium in the potassium permanganate used, lead dioxide reduces the permanganate to manganese dioxide without itself suffering reduction, while in the presence of an excess of stronger nitric acid, e.g. normal to eight normal, the lead dioxide is also reduced.

I, when the nitric acid is equivalent to the potassium in the potassium permanganate,

[Pg 4] The reducing action of manganese dioxide upon potassium permanganate was suspected from the observed increase in the rapidity of the decomposition of potassium permanganate solutions. But only a suggestion of such a reaction could be found in the literature. Thénard,[2] in 1856 states that manganese dioxide may act upon potassium permanganate either as a reducing agent, in which act the manganese dioxide is changed to a manganate, or its influence may be catalytic, causing the evolution of oxygen. Again Mulder[3] in 1858, ascribed the decomposition of potassium permanganate solutions to the presence of some potassium manganate.

It could not be ascertained that any investigation of this matter had [Pg 5] ever been undertaken. It was therefore decided to study the question and it appeared that the most satisfactory evidence could be obtained by measuring the quantity of oxygen which is evolved when potassium permanganate and manganese dioxide are brought together.

“1) a flask, A, in which the reactions were conducted. A melting point bulb of about 40 cc. capacity, the diameter of its neck being 20 mm., was used for this purpose.

This was closed with a two-hole rubber stopper, through one hole of which passed:

[Pg 6] 2) A small glass tube, BB, running up from the flask about 40 cm., and then bent twice at right angles. One limb of this tube was surrounded by a small Liebig’s condenser, while the shorter turned down to meet—

3) a Schiff’s azotometer filled with mercury and connected at its top with the tube above mentioned. In practice it was found desirable to have a little water on the top of the mercury column.

4) Through the second hole of the rubber stopper closing the flask was passed a short piece of glass tubing bent obliquely just above the stopper and tightly connected with a rubber tube about 50 cm. long, DD. This tube was clamped near its lower end with a Mohr’s pinch-cock, while the upper was connected with the stem of a small funnel, F. [Pg 7]

When an experiment was to be conducted, the azotometer C, was connected to the tube, B, and tied tightly, a piece of good rubber tubing being used for the connection. The reservoir of the azotometer, M, was then raised until the mercury had driven out all the air in C, and the stop-cock closed. Next the funnel F was filled with water, the pinch-cock closing D opened and the water allowed to flow down and drive out all the air in the tube. The latter was then clamped and thus kept full of water. The apparatus being now ready, the flask A, containing the substances in the desired quantity, was made fast to B and D by means of its stopper. The stop-cock of C opened. The flask A was heated in a water bath for any desired time, the oxygen being collected in C as fast as [Pg 8] it was given off.

At the end of the experiment, all the gases which remained in A and B were driven over into C by lowering the reservoir M and opening the pinch-cock at D. When this was accomplished the stop-cock of C was closed and the gases brought under atmospheric pressure by bringing the mercury in C and M to the same level.

It will be seen that in this gas volume was included the air which A and B contained at the beginning of the experiment.

The oxygen evolved from the contents of the flask was determined thus: After reading off the total volume of air and oxygen and reducing to normal conditions, the total volume of oxygen was obtained by absorption with phosphorus or pyrogallol, and from the residual nitrogen could be calculated from the volume of air to be deducted from the total volume of gases. The remainder is the volume of oxygen sought.”

The flask of apparatus No. I contained manganese dioxide and dilute nitric acid.

The flask of apparatus No. II contained potassium permanganate and dilute nitric acid.

The flask of apparatus No. III contained potassium permanganate and dilute nitric acid and manganese dioxide.

The manganese dioxide used in these experiments was precipitated from a [Pg 10] solution of potassium permanganate by a dilute solution of manganous sulfate in the manner described on page 34 and then washed and dried at 100°C.

An illustration of the proportions in which the different substances were brought together in each of the three flasks is to be found in the following statement of the quantities used in the first experiment.

The variations from these proportions occurring in subsequent experiments are noted in the table giving the summary of the results. Usually about 150 m.g. of manganese dioxide were used and the solutions in the three flasks were brought to the same volume by addition of distilled water. [Pg 11]

The nitric acid in No. I is calculated to be the same as that remaining free after the potassium of the permanganate in No. III has been neutralized. It will be clear that the quantities of free nitric acid [Pg 12] are the same in flask No. I and in flask No. III provided the potassium of the permanganate is appropriated by the nitric acid. Moreover each flask contains the same quantity of manganese dioxide and the volume of the liquid is the same in both.

On the other hand flask No. III contains permanganic acid. This arrangement was selected in order to determine how far the evolution of oxygen was influenced by the action of nitric acid on the manganese dioxide or by the spontaneous decomposition of permanganic acid. It was thought that if more oxygen should be obtained from flask No. III containing a mixture of permanganate, manganese dioxide and nitric acid, than from mixtures No. I and No. II, the larger volume must be due [Pg 13] to the reduction of the permanganate by the manganese oxide.

The three flasks after having been filled as described were attached to the apparatus and then all submerged to the same depth in the boiling water of a single glass water-bath. The stop-cocks of the azotometers were then opened and the mercury allowed to fall to within about fifty millimetres of its level in the reservoirs. This difference in level was maintained as nearly as practicable by lowering the reservoirs commenserably with the increase in gas volume. No action could be observed in flasks No. I and No. II during the whole course of the experiment. The contents of flask No. III however gave off bubbles of oxygen immediately, the mercury fell in the azotometer and the dark purple of the permanganate solution in flask No. III became rapidly [Pg 14] lighter. Within about five minutes it was reduced to a delicate pink but this tint persisted for about ten minutes when it also disappeared. Immediately after the disappearance of the permanganate color the solution was filled with a brown oxide which remained for about thirty five minutes when it subsided leaving the supernatant liquid clear. Notwithstanding the fact that the color of the permanganate had entirely disappeared and the suspended oxide had subsided within an hour after beginning the experiment, the flasks in the earlier experiments were allowed to remain for two hours longer. By admitting distilled water through the tube D [see figure] the gas was then forced over into the azotometer. Finally, the oxygen was determined in the manner previously described. [Pg 15]

The following illustration from the first experiment may serve to show the method of calculating the results.

	I	II	III
Total air and oxygen	=	42.60 c.c.	52.40 c.c.	60.60 c.c.
Nitrogen after absorption of oxygen	=	34.00 c.c.	40.90 c.c.	37.80 c.c.
Oxygen	=	8.60 c.c.	11.50 c.c.	22.80 c.c.
Air =	79.8% nitrogen
	20.2% oxygen

Oxygen of air	×	20.2	=	8.60 c.c.	10.353 c.c.	9.57 c.c.
Nitrogen found	79.8

Oxygen obtained	=	0.0	1.147 c.c.	13.23 c.c.
Temperature	=	21°C.
Barometer	=	737 mm.
Oxygen obtained at Normal	=	0	1.033 c.c.	11.913 c.c.
The 20 c.c. KMnO₄	=	112.48 m.g.
1 atom of oxygen	=	7.967 c.c.

Atoms oxygen found	I	II	III
from the molecule KMnO₄	=	0	0.129	1.496

[Pg 16] As at the end of the preceding calculation the results are expressed in the table following in terms of oxygen atoms obtained from each molecule of potassium permanganate [KMnO₄] reduced. Thus an equivalent of one atom of oxygen from one molecule of potassium permanganate would equal 15.96/157.67 of the weight of potassium permanganate used in the experiment. This weight divided by the weight of one cubic centimetre of oxygen gives the number of cubic centimetres of oxygen at normal, equivalent to one atom of oxygen from one molecule of potassium permanganate. The results obtained are tabulated as follows: [Pg 17]

Three-hour determinations.
1	0.00	2	0.13	1	1.495	3
2	0.00	”	?	1	1.493	”
3		”	0.13	3	1.532*	”
4	0.00	”	0.21	”	1.466	”
5	0.03	”	0.10	”	1.467	”
6	0.02	”	0.25	”		”
7	0.06	”	0.08	”	1.526*	”
8	0.04	”	0.15	”	1.527	”
9	0.04	”	0.11	”	1.504	”
10		”	0.20	”	1.504	”
11	0.03	”	0.14	”	1.516	”
12	0.00	”	0.18	”	1.524	”
13	0.03	”	0.25	”	1.559*	”
14	0.05	”	0.26	”	1.574	” [Pg 18]
15	0.02	1	0.32	2	1.552	2
16	0.03	”	0.31	”	1.583?	”
17	0.04	”	0.31	”	1.512	”
18	0.01	”	0.32	”	1.466	”
19	0.00	”	0.18	”	1.412	”
20	0.01	”	0.36	”	1.411	”
21	0.06	”	0.22	”	1.402	”
22	0.00	”	0.30	”	1.495*	”
23		2	0.08	3	1.469	3
[5]Fifty minute determinations
24	0.04	1	0.06	2	1.564	2
25	0.04	”	0.11	”	1.491	”
26	0.05	”	?	”	1.512	”
27	0.03	”	0.05	”	1.532	”
[6]Fifteen minute determinations
28	0.05	1	0.08	2	1.340	2
29	0.04	”	0.05	”	1.325	”
30	0.06	”	0.05	”	1.335	”
31	0.00	”	0.00	”	1.347	”
32	0.03	”	0.03	”	1.412	” [Pg 19]
33	0.02	2	0.02	3	1.363	3
34	0.02	”	0.06	”	1.377	”
35	0.00	”	0.02	”	1.363	”

Inspection of the table will show that whether the oxygen were determined immediately after the subsidence of the oxides (i.e. after fifty minutes) or after three hours the results obtained are practically the same. The tendency of the potassium permanganate to lose strength made the frequent preparation of new samples advisable. Wherever a new sample has been used in the course of the experiments, the fact has been noted in the table by an asterisk. It will be noticed that where a new solution is used the figures for flask no. III are immediately larger and nearer to one and one half atoms of oxygen from each molecule of potassium permanganate. [Pg 20]

A phosphorus gas-pipette was used for the absorption of the oxygen in all the experiments the results of which are embodied in the foregoing table. In subsequent experiments an alkaline solution of pyrogallol was employed. It is now known that the variation in the composition of the manganese oxide in use had some influence upon the results.

It has also been found that the manganese dioxide prepared by the reduction of permanganate by manganese sulphate is much less stable than was supposed at the time this work was begun. The dioxide prepared in this way begins immediately to lose oxygen spontaneously but recovers the same in the presence of an excess of potassium permanganate. In the light of these facts it is easy to understand why lower results were obtained when the oxygen was determined immediately [Pg 21] after the disappearance of the color of the permanganate and before the suspended oxide had subsided. It appears that the manganese oxide employed in these experiments was not, as was supposed at the time, the dioxide but one containing a smaller proportion of oxygen. If such is the case the first action of the permanganate upon it would be to replace the oxygen which had been lost. The reduction of the remaining permanganate would then probably be in accordance with the equation,

At the time when the permanganate color disappears, all of the manganese is in the dioxide condition and the further evolution of oxygen, which is shown by the preceding experiments to take place during the subsidence of the suspended oxides, is due to a partial [Pg 22] reduction of this manganese. Therefore the relation of the reduction of the manganese oxide below the MnO₂ condition before the treatment with permanganate to the reduction which follows the disappearance of the permanganate color will determine whether the oxygen evolved shall be more or less than one and one half atoms to each molecule of permanganate.

Neither variations in the quantities of nitric acid used (from two to three molecules in No. III) nor the very slight variations in the amount of manganese dioxide used, seem to affect appreciably the amount of oxygen obtained.

It appears that the action of manganese dioxide on potassium permanganate is the same as that of lead superoxide[7] in the presence of very dilute nitric acid. Both reduce it to manganese [Pg 23] dioxide with the evolution of one and one half atoms of oxygen to each molecule of the permanganate.

The evolution of oxygen from flask No. I containing manganese dioxide and nitric acid is very slight. From flask No. II containing potassium permanganate and one equivalent nitric acid, it is also slight but usually greater than from flask No. I. The differences are much greater in the case of those determinations in which the heating of the flask was continued for three hours and in this fact is to be found further evidence of the reducing action of manganese dioxide on potassium permanganate.

The possibility of a reaction analogous to that between potassium permanganate and lead dioxide in the presence of strong nitric acid seems to be excluded by the fact that the higher oxides of manganese may be prepared in the presence of concentrated nitric acid.

As an analysis of the manganese dioxide showed the probable presence of some manganese in the manganous condition, a sample was treated on the water-bath for some days with dilute nitric acid while distilled water was added from time to time to keep the dilution nearly constant. This was done for the purpose of determining whether the manganous manganese might not be extracted in the form of manganese nitrate. The light brown oxide which was used in the previous experiments had been prepared by adding a dilute solution of manganous sulphate to a hot [Pg 25] solution containing potassium permanganate in excess and dilute nitric acid. No analysis of the oxide thus prepared was made at the time of its preparation, but it has been shown by the work of others that the oxide must have had at that time a composition as regards the relation of manganese to oxygen, very nearly equivalent to that of MnO₂. During the course of the experiments previously recorded, a determination of the ratio of the manganese to the available oxygen in the compound was made and found to be as

A second analysis made some weeks later gave a ratio of manganese to available oxygen of 1.06: 1.00.— [Pg 26]

The manganese was determined by the method of Gibbs[8] and the available oxygen by oxalic acid and potassium permanganate.

It was this oxide which was treated with nitric acid in the manner described. In the course of this treatment the light brown color changed to black and the oxide became heavier. The dilute nitric acid in which the oxide had been digested was found to contain manganous manganese, but analysis of the black product showed that the oxide had suffered a still further reduction. The ratio of manganese to available oxygen was found to have risen from 1.06: 1.00 to 1.157: 1.000. The analytical data are given below:— [Pg 27]

This ratio would correspond very nearly to a compound having the composition MnO·6MnO₂ but it is by no means certain that the reducing action of nitric acid was finished. The action of this oxide on potassium permanganate was determined under the same conditions as in the case of the brown oxide as described on page 14. The following illustration of the proportions used is taken from the first experiment.

The first two results are from experiments in which the action was stopped at the first loss of the color of potassium permanganate. The last two are the results from experiments in which the action was stopped after the oxide had settled leaving a clear colorless supernatant liquid. The amount of oxygen given off in any one case is expressed in the table as the number of atoms of oxygen derived from each molecule of potassium permanganate, as follows: [Pg 29]

A = N/10 nitric acid. No. of molecules.
1	2 hours.
	0.00	2	0.18	3	1.337	3
2	2¼ hours
	0.02	”	0.24	”	1.335	”
3	2½ hours
	0.02	”	0.44	”	1.402	”
4	4½ hours
	0.00	”	0.55	”	1.362	”

The volume of the oxygen evolved is considerably smaller than that obtained when the brown oxide was used. It is nevertheless larger than could have been evolved if all of the manganese had been left in the dioxide condition at the close of the experiment. This fact [Pg 30]
indicates that there was a slight reduction of the manganese dioxide after the disappearance of the color of the permanganate. That such a reduction of manganese dioxide does take place will be made apparent by a comparison of the results of the first two experiments in which the oxygen was measured soon after the color of permanganate had disappeared, with the results of the last two experiments in which the oxygen was determined after a longer interval. It will be noticed in this as in the series of experiments with the brown oxide that the rate of the evolution of oxygen liberated in flask No. II increases with the time of heating.

A few experiments were made to determine how much nitric acid is neutralized under the conditions which prevailed in the foregoing experiments.

I. The flask contained brown oxide 150 m.g. N/10 nitric acid 6.98 c.c. and was heated for three hours in the water-bath.

Acid neutralized = 4.51 c.c. = 64.60 percent.

II. The flask contained brown oxide 150 m.g. N/10 nitric acid 6.98 c.c. and was heated for 50 minutes in the water-bath.

Acid neutralized = 3.09 c.c. = 44.20 percent.

III. The flask contained brown oxide 150 m.g. N/10 nitric acid 7.46 c.c. and was heated for fifty minutes in the water-bath.

Acid neutralized = 3.16 c.c. = 42.30 percent. [Pg 32]

IV. The flask contained brown oxide 150 m.g. N/10 nitric acid 7.46 c.c. and was heated for 15 minutes in the water-bath.

Acid neutralized 2.76 c.c. = 37.0 percent

V. The flask contained brown oxide 150 m.g. potassium permanganate 20 c.c. = 112.48 m.g. N/10 nitric acid 6.98 c.c. (= 2 molecules for each molecule of KMnO₄) and was heated for three hours in the water-bath.

Acid neutralized = 0.35 c.c. = 5.0 percent.

VI. Repetition of No. V.

Acid neutralized = 0.44 c.c. = 6.3 percent.

VII. The flask contained brown oxide 150 m.g. potassium permanganate the same as in numbers V and VI and was heated for 15 minutes in the water-bath.

Acid neutralized = 5.2 percent.

VIII. Repetition of No. VII

Acid neutralized = 4.0 percent [Pg 33]

IX. The flask contained black oxide 150 m.g. N/10 nitric acid 14.93 c.c. and was heated for two and one fourth hours in the water-bath.

Acid neutralized = 4.87 c.c. = 32.46 percent.

X. Repetition of No. IX.

Acid neutralized = 38.10 percent.

XI. The flask contained black oxide 150 m.g. potassium permanganate 20 c.c. = 177.71 m.g., N/10 nitric acid 22.39 c.c. (= 2 molecules for each molecule of KMnO₄) and was heated four and one half hours in the water bath.

Acid neutralized = 100.00 percent.

No definite conclusions can be drawn from these neutralization experiments since it is well known that manganese oxides prepared as were those used in these experiments always contain some, though probably not a constant quantity of alkali. It is stated by Bemmelen[9] that manganese dioxide decomposed the salts of the alkalies with liberation of acid.

Having found in the course of the work already described that manganese dioxide prepared in the wet way is much less stable than was supposed, it was decided to make some experiments upon the spontaneous decomposition which it undergoes. To this end a fresh sample was prepared in the following manner.

10 grams of potassium permanganate were dissolved in 500 c.c. of distilled water and the solution allowed to settle for one day. The liquid was them filtered through glass wool, heated to 65°C. and treated [Pg 35] with 320 c.c. N/10 nitric acid, having also a temperature of 65°C. 20.5 grams of manganous sulphate dissolved in 2.5 litres of water heated to 65°C, were now added, with stirring, to the acidified solution of potassium permanganate. The precipitate was allowed to settle and the supernatant liquid which still retained the permanganate color, decanted. The residue was then treated with water, stirred and allowed to settle. The water was decanted and the oxide filtered. The filter used consisted of two platinum cones between which was placed a small paper filter which did not quite reach to the edge of the outer cone. This filter was placed in the bottom of a glass funnel and the oxide poured upon it. The oxide was repeatedly washed with distilled water [Pg 36] and then transferred to a porous plate. It was afterwards heated for several hours to a temperature of 65°C. At this temperature it was found impracticable to bring the oxide to a constant weight, but this fact was no serious obstacle in the way of the subsequent work since it was only desired to ascertain what changes take place in the ratio of the manganese to the available oxygen. The manganese was determined by the method of Gibbs and the available oxygen by oxalic acid and potassium permanganate. An analysis of the oxide made shortly after its preparation in the manner described, gave

The above analysis was made May 1, 1892. The oxide was then placed in a glass-stoppered weighing bottle and allowed to stand until November. An analysis made on the tenth day of the latter month gave a ratio of manganese to available oxygen of

corresponding very closely to a composition MnO·5MnO₂, in which the calculated ratio is

Six month later (April 20, 1893) an analysis of the same material showed a ratio of manganese to available oxygen of

[Pg 38] This result was confirmed Mʳ Walker who made repeated analyses of the substance at the same time.

Another sample of manganese oxide was prepared in the same manner as that used in the previous experiments and placed under water. An analysis made after

The results here recorded clearly indicate that the brown oxide of manganese which is prepared by the reduction of potassium permanganate by manganese sulphate undergoes a spontaneous decomposition involving a loss of oxygen. This loss of oxygen or the effect of varying conditions upon this decomposition of manganese dioxide is now being investigated by Mʳ Walker of this laboratory.

The following experiments were made for the purpose of determining the effect of varying quantities of manganese oxide on the time required for the reduction of potassium permanganate.

The ratio of manganese to available oxygen in the material used for these experiments was determined and found to be

The experiments were conducted after the same manner as those previously described. [Pg 40]

Different portions of the manganese oxide were weighed out and treated in the flasks used in the previous experiments with the quantities of permanganate which were found by calculation to have the desired molecular ratios to the oxide.

A quantity of N/10 nitric acid equivalent to the potassium of the potassium permanganate was added. The flasks were then immersed in the bath of boiling water and the time required for the disappearance of the permanganate color noted.

The rations of the oxide to the permanganate and the times required for the reduction of the latter are embodied in the following table. [Pg 41]

Molecular Ratio Oxide to KMnO₄	1:1	2:1	3:1	4:1	5:1	6:1	7:1
1”	120	68
2”	110	65
3”	150	65
4”	150	80
5”	120	75
6”	120	75
7”	175(?)	78	53
8”	160	79	54
9”	145		41	30
10”	120		50	36
11”	?		47	32
12”	110			37	30
13”	64		[10]	20(?) 20(?)
14”	72			5(?)	5(?)
15”	85					5(?)	5(?)

[Pg 42] The results appearing in the table on the same horizontal lines are those of experiments made simultaneously, that is, the flasks in these experiments were immersed at the same time and in the same water-bath. These, that is the results appearing on the same horizontal line, and these only are comparable, since it was found that very slight differences in the temperature of the bath were of great influence on the length of time required for the reduction of the permanganate.

It is clear that the rate of the reduction of the permanganate is greatly increased by increasing the quantity of the manganese oxide.

After reduction of the permanganate, the contents of the flasks were in [Pg 43] every case filtered and the filtrate tested by Crum’s reaction for the presence of manganese. No manganese was found. The absence of manganese in the filtrate shows that the reduction of the permanganate was not due to the formation of manganese nitrate, though it will be clear from the results of subsequent experiments that the presence of nitric acid exerts an influence on the rate of the reduction.

The condition were the same as under A, except that the nitric acid was omitted. Those flasks containing potassium permanganate and one, two and seven molecular equivalents respectively of the manganese oxide were immersed in the water-bath as before. [Pg 44]

The conditions were the same as under B, except that five molecules of potassium hydroxide were added for each molecule of the permanganate.

It appears that potassium permanganate is less easily reduced by manganese oxide in neutral than in acid solutions and in alkaline that in neutral solutions.

In these experiments, the manganese oxide used was prepared in the same manner as that in which the proportion of manganese to available oxygen was found immediately after its preparation to be

[Pg 46] It was dried for several days at 65°C., but for almost a month after its preparation was not used. Hence, what the ratio of the manganese to the oxygen at the time when the permanganate was treated with it, is quite uncertain. It however appears probable from the subsequent experiments on the instability of manganese dioxide at 65°C. that the ratio of manganese to available oxygen must have been at about 1.05: 1.00 corresponding to a formula MnO·20MnO₂.

Two solutions of permanganate were made, filtered through glass wool and standardized.

A cubic centimetre of this was found to be equivalent to 5.278 m.g. iron in the ferrous condition.

A cubic centimetre of this was found to be equivalent to 14.379 m.g. iron in the ferrous condition. [Pg 47]

Three 250 c.c. portions of each of the solutions A and B were placed in clean glass-stoppered bottles. These bottles were labelled “a”, “a′ ” and “a″ ” “b”, “b′ ” and “b″ ”.

a contained 250 c.c. potassium permanganate each cubic centimetre of which was equivalent to 5.278 m.g. Fe″. It was closed and put away in the dark and allowed to stand from June fourteenth until the fourteenth of the following October. Its strength was then determined and found to have declined 0.72 percent.

“a′ ” contained the same quantity of the same permanganate solution as “a” and it was closed on the same date and placed in mildly diffused light until October fourteenth. An analysis on the latter date showed that its strength had also declined 0.72 percent. [Pg 48]

“a″ ” contained the same quantity of the same permanganate solution as “a” and “a′ ” and to this was added 0.5 gram of the manganese oxide previously referred to. The bottle was then closed and placed in diffused light beside “a′ ”. An analysis, October fourteenth showed that its strength had declined 34.62 percent.

“b” contained potassium permanganate each cubic centimetre of which was equivalent to 14.379 m.g. Fe″. It was closed and put away in the dark beside “a”. An analysis October fourteenth showed that its strength had declined 1.71 percent.

“b′ ” contained the same quantity of the same permanganate as “b”. It was closed and placed in mildly diffused light beside “a′ ”. An analysis October fourteenth showed a decline in strength of 2.41 percent. [Pg 49]

“b″ ” contained the same quantity of the same permanganate as “b” and “b′ ”. To it was added 0.5 grams of the manganese oxide. The bottle was closed and placed in diffused light beside “a′ ”, “a″ ”, and “b′ ”. An analysis, October fourteenth showed a decline in strength of 78.86 percent.

The conclusions to be drawn from the foregoing results are (1) that dilute solutions of potassium permanganate are more stable both in diffused light and in darkness than the more concentrated ones, and (2) that the presence of manganese oxides hasten to an enormous degree the reduction of potassium permanganate even at summer temperatures. It will also be observed that this reducing action of the manganese oxide is greater in the stronger than in the more dilute solutions. It should be remarked that the summer of 1892 in which these experiments were made, was one of unusual heat.

The oxide used in these experiments was one which had been prepared in the manner heretofore described by adding manganese sulphate to an excess of potassium permanganate. Soon after its preparation the ratio of manganese to available oxygen in it was found to be

[Pg 51] At the time when it was used in these experiments, the ratio of manganese to available oxygen was found to be

Corresponding very nearly to the ratio of manganese to available oxygen in MnO·5MnO₂.

230 m.g. of the oxide was treated with the quantity of permanganate calculated to be necessary for its oxidation to manganese dioxide. The mixture was kept at a temperature of 22°C. until the color of the permanganate disappeared. This required about ten hours.

A repetition of experiment I. An analysis of the oxide after decolorization of the permanganate gave a ratio of manganese to available oxygen of

The conditions are the same as in the preceding experiments except that twice the amount of permanganate calculated for the conversion of the oxide into manganese dioxide was added.

An analysis of the residue after decolorization gave a ratio of manganese to available oxygen of

A repetition of experiment III. An analysis of the residue gave a ratio [Pg 53] of manganese to available oxygen of

A repetition of experiments III and IV. The ratio of manganese to available oxygen in the residue was

The foregoing results indicate (experiments III, IV, and V) that the oxygen lost spontaneously by manganese dioxide prepared in the wet way, is fully recovered when the reduced oxide is treated with excess of potassium permanganate.

The ratio of the manganese to the available oxygen was determined in the following manner. The contents of the flask were filtered through asbestos and the flask and the precipitate washed with cold water. The [Pg 54] contents of the filter were then returned to the flask and treated with an excess of a standard solution of oxalic acid and dilute sulphuric acid. After reduction the excess of the oxalic acid was determined by a standard solution of potassium permanganate.

The solution was then filtered, well washed and the manganese in the filtrate precipitated by the method of Gibbs. From the total amount of manganese found, there was deducted the quantity which was introduced in determining the excess of oxalic acid by potassium permanganate.

Potassium permanganate in weakly acid, in neutral, and in alkaline solutions, is reduced by manganese dioxide which has been prepared in the wet way, with evolution of one and one half atoms of oxygen for each molecule of the permanganate. In other words, the permanganate is reduced to manganese dioxide.

The rate of reduction is greatly increased by increasing the proportion of manganese dioxide.

In concentrated solutions of potassium permanganate, the reduction by manganese dioxide is relatively more rapid than in dilute.

Manganese oxide, prepared in the wet way i.e. by the addition of manganese sulphate to a hot solution containing an excess of permanganate, has the composition MnO₂ as regards the ratio of manganese to available oxygen.

This oxide is unstable. It loses oxygen spontaneously even at ordinary temperatures. [Pg 57]

The oxygen which is thus lost is recovered when the oxide is again treated with an excess of potassium permanganate.

It is suggested that a partial explanation of the reduction of potassium permanganate by manganese oxide may be found in the instability of the latter; in other words that the reduction may consist in alternate reduction and reoxidation processes. But when the rapidity of the reduction is taken into account, it seems probable that a reaction analogous to that between permanganic acid and hydrogen superoxide must also take place.

Arthur John Hopkins was born September 20, 1864 in Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Receiving his preparation for college in the public schools of that town, he entered Amherst College in 1881 and graduated with the degree of A. B. in 1885. The five years following were spent in teaching in the States of Massachusetts and New York. He entered the Johns Hopkins University in 1890, was assistant in the quantitative laboratory of that university during the academic year of 1891-92, and the following year was appointed Fellow in Chemistry.

Footnotes:

[1] Johns Hopkins University 1892

[2] Comptes Rendues 42, 382

[3] Jahresbericht 1858 p. 581

[4] This apparatus was used by Allen and described by him. I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to him for the illustration and description given here which is taken by permission word for word from his dissertation.

[5] This marked the time when the oxides first settled, leaving a colorless supernatant liquid.

[6] This marked the time when the solution was first decolorized.

[7] Allen’s thesis.

[8] Silliman’s Am. J. Science (2) 44.216

[9] J. für Prak. Ch. (2) 23, 324-379.

[10] Decolorized before time was taken.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE REACTION BETWEEN MANGANESE DIOXIDE AND POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

		Page.
I	Introduction	1
II	Description of Apparatus	3
III	Action of Manganese Dioxide on
	Potassium Permanganate in acid solution	9
IV	Action of a Black Oxide of Manganese on
	Potassium Permanganate	24
V	The Amount of Nitric Acid Neutralized	31
VI	The Stability of Manganese Dioxide	34
VII	The Effect of Varying Quantities of
	Manganese Oxide and Potassium Permanganate	39
VIII	The Reduction of Neutral Potassium Permanganate
	by Manganese Oxide at Ordinary Temperature	45
IX	Action of Potassium Permanganate upon a
	Manganese Oxide Obtained from Manganese
	Dioxide by Spontaneous Decomposition	50

	Conclusion

Flask No. I	Manganese dioxide 150 m.g.
	N/10 nitric acid 14.28 c.c.
	[= Mn. in KMnO₄ in No. II or No. III]
	Water, 27.12 c.c.
	[Total solution = 41.40 c.c.]

Flask No. II	Potassium permanganate, 20 c.c. = 112.48 m.g. KMnO₄.
	N/10 nitric acid 7.14 c.c. [= K in KMnO₄]
	Water, 14.26 c.c.
	[Total solution = 41.40 c.c.]

Flask No. III	Potassium permanganate, 20 c.c. = 112.48 m.g. KMnO₄.
	N/10 nitric acid 21.40 c.c. [= K + Mn in KMnO₄]
	Manganese dioxide 150 m.g.

Flask No. I	Manganese oxide, black, = 150 m.g.
	N/10 nitric acid = 14.93 c.c.
	[= Mn in KMnO₄ in No. II or No. III]
	Water = 27.46 c.c.
	[Total solution = 42.39 c.c.]
[Pg 28]
Flask No. II	Potassium permanganate = 20 c.c. = 117.71 m.g.
	N/10 nitric acid = 22.39 c.c.
	[= K and Mn in KMnO₄
	[Total solution = 42.39 c.c.]

Flask No. III	Potassium permanganate = 20 c.c. = 117.71 m.g.
	N/10 nitric acid = 22.39 c.c.
	[= K and Mn in KMnO₄]
	Manganese oxide, black = 150 m.g.
	[Total solution = 42.39 c.c.]

No. I	containing one molecule of oxide and	57 hours
	one molecule KMnO₄ was reduced in

No. II	containing two molecules of oxide and	35 hours
	one molecule KMnO₄ was reduced in

No. III	containing seven molecules of oxide	2¾ hours
	and one molecule KMnO₄ was reduced in

No. I	containing one molecules of oxide for	91¾ hours.
	each molecule KMnO₄ was reduced in

No. II	containing two molecules of oxide	55(?) hours.
	for each molecule KMnO₄ was reduced in

No. III	containing seven molecules of oxide for	10 hours.
	each molecule KMnO₄ was reduced in

The Project Gutenberg eBook of The reaction between manganese dioxide and potassium permanganate

The Reaction between
Manganese Dioxide
and
Potassium Permanganate.

Introduction.

Description of Apparatus.

Action of manganese dioxide
on potassium permanganate
in acid solution.

Action of a Black Oxide of Manganese
on Potassium Permanganate.——

The Amount of Nitric Acid neutralized.

The Stability of Manganese Dioxide.

The Effect of Varying Quantities
of Manganese Oxide on
Potassium Permanganate.

The Reduction of
Neutral Potassium Permanganate
by Manganese Oxide at
Ordinary Temperature.

Action of Potassium Permanganate
upon a Manganese Oxide Derived
from Manganese Dioxide by
Spontaneous Decomposition.

Summary of Conclusions—

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

Three-hour determinations.
	Flask I		Flask II		Flask III
	MnO₂ [150 m.g.]	N/10 HNO₃ No. of molecules	KMnO₄ 20 c.c. = 112.48 m.g.	N/10 HNO₃ No. of molecules	KMnO₄ 20 c.c. = 112.48 m.g.	N/10 HNO₃ No. of molecules
1	0.00	2	0.13	1	1.495	3
2	0.00	”	?	1	1.493	”
3		”	0.13	3	1.532*	”
4	0.00	”	0.21	”	1.466	”
5	0.03	”	0.10	”	1.467	”
6	0.02	”	0.25	”		”
7	0.06	”	0.08	”	1.526*	”
8	0.04	”	0.15	”	1.527	”
9	0.04	”	0.11	”	1.504	”
10		”	0.20	”	1.504	”
11	0.03	”	0.14	”	1.516	”
12	0.00	”	0.18	”	1.524	”
13	0.03	”	0.25	”	1.559*	”
14	0.05	”	0.26	”	1.574	” [Pg 18]
15	0.02	1	0.32	2	1.552	2
16	0.03	”	0.31	”	1.583?	”
17	0.04	”	0.31	”	1.512	”
18	0.01	”	0.32	”	1.466	”
19	0.00	”	0.18	”	1.412	”
20	0.01	”	0.36	”	1.411	”
21	0.06	”	0.22	”	1.402	”
22	0.00	”	0.30	”	1.495*	”
23		2	0.08	3	1.469	3
[5]Fifty minute determinations
24	0.04	1	0.06	2	1.564	2
25	0.04	”	0.11	”	1.491	”
26	0.05	”	?	”	1.512	”
27	0.03	”	0.05	”	1.532	”
[6]Fifteen minute determinations
28	0.05	1	0.08	2	1.340	2
29	0.04	”	0.05	”	1.325	”
30	0.06	”	0.05	”	1.335	”
31	0.00	”	0.00	”	1.347	”
32	0.03	”	0.03	”	1.412	” [Pg 19]
33	0.02	2	0.02	3	1.363	3
34	0.02	”	0.06	”	1.377	”
35	0.00	”	0.02	”	1.363	”

The substance gave	54.76	percent	manganese
	15.02	”	available oxygen.

The substance gave	60.49	percent	manganese
	60.46	”	”
and
	15.23	percent	oxygen
	15.19	”	”

Manganese	51.98	percent	= 51.86	pr. ct.
	51.74	”

Oxygen	14.836	percent	= 14.837	”
	14.839	”

Eight	days	gave	a	ratio	of	Mn :	available	O	= 1.013 : 1.000
Twenty	”	”	”	”	”	”	”	”	= 1.037 : 1.000
Forty three	”	”	”	”	”	”	”	”	= 1.040 : 1.000

Molecular Ratio Oxide to KMnO₄	1:1	2:1	3:1	4:1	5:1	6:1	7:1
Time of decolorization in minutes
1”	120	68
2”	110	65
3”	150	65
4”	150	80
5”	120	75
6”	120	75
7”	175(?)	78	53
8”	160	79	54
9”	145		41	30
10”	120		50	36
11”	?		47	32
12”	110			37	30
13”	64		[10]	20(?) 20(?)
14”	72			5(?)	5(?)
15”	85					5(?)	5(?)

The Project Gutenberg eBook of The reaction between manganese dioxide and potassium permanganate

The Reaction between Manganese Dioxideand Potassium Permanganate.