Title: Ukrainian folk songs
A historical treatise
Author: Humphrey Kowalsky
Release date: March 24, 2026 [eBook #78295]
Language: English
Original publication: Boston: Stratford Company, 1925
Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/78295
Credits: Shawn Carraher, Tim Lindell and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This book was produced from images made available by the HathiTrust Digital Library.)
UKRAINIAN FOLK SONGS
A Historical Treatise
By
REV. HUMPHREY KOWALSKY
1925
THE STRATFORD COMPANY, Publishers
Boston, Massachusetts
Copyright, 1925
By
REV. HUMPHREY KOWALSKY
[Pg i]
It is the opinion of most scholarly critics that there are no other Slavic people so rich in folk lore as the Ukrainians. The Ukrainian songs and airs are innumerable. A Ukrainian peasant is a singer in the full sense of the word; singing is his daily bread; no work, no walk, no family, social entertainment, no engagement of any kind goes without singing or “ex tempore” improvisation of some air and words; the proverb is well known that “a Cossack (a Ukrainian) laughs and sings through his tears,” which means that even in time of his woes and worry a Ukrainian sings: sighs and sings! A Ukrainian, provided he be not depraved and deprived of his original native intuition by a foreign, and especially the modern urban culture (and thanks be to the Providence the aboriginal [Pg ii]feeling, the poetry of soul still predominates and is the express characteristic of every Ukrainian of all social and cultural degrees), is a singer, nature’s own musician of no base quality. He has hundred-fold ways of expressing his hilarity or sadness in every instance, corresponding to and depicting every motion of body and soul: whether he be bringing the muck out of his stables to his fields, or the cattle to pasture in the spring, or thrashing his corn, or his wife weaving her cloth in winter; whether he be mowing, reaping, or at some trade in fall, or resting and merry-making amid the heat, verdure and fragrant Ukrainian nature in summer—he constantly sings, alone or in company; even his prayers are mostly performed through singing.
A student well acquainted with Ukrainian geography and the beauties of her nature, will agree with the author that nature herself prompts the Ukrainian to express his very soul in spontaneous singing; by the fragrance of meadows rich with the odors of a thousand flowers; [Pg iii]by the song of the nightingales that wake the infants from their slumber in the early morning; by the rich black earth, plains, wide steppes, balmy forests and lofty hills of the Carpathians and the Caucasus; by the gentle, sweet Slavonic temper educated in the bosom of nature’s luxuries; and last but not least—by the history which fortune, otherwise so bounteous with the Ukrainians, has made so harsh and strenuous for them, making the Ukrainians a subject of almost continuous struggle with foreign invaders—Tartars, Turks and the Poles and the Russians especially.
It is to be lamented that many of us do not understand or sufficiently prize the value of the folk songs of whatever origin or language they may be; we fail to see their beauty and meaning in the life of every living national organism; we can not see why so much stress is put on them by the educators. Some regard these songs as merely a pastime or extravagant folly of youthful revelry. True, that some original, charming, pensive songs are and have been [Pg iv]adulterated and the effect soiled by wanton pornology and perverted sentences—yet these ought to be easily eliminated from the sacred treasury of the people.
It very seldom happens that the Ukrainian songs are changed in meaning and effect except it be by some foreign, usually Polish or Russian, words; sometimes even a whole, new worthless song is introduced among the Ukrainians, but on tracing its origin it is found out that it was of Polish, Russian or other foreign source brought about by men serving in foreign armies, or being in contact with other nationalities; such songs are commonly avoided with care, and traditional Ukrainian compositions are sung exclusively. This is true also regarding other Ukrainian folklore such as rural tales, ritual songs and ballads.
A noticeable decline in purity and beauty of Ukrainian folklore is observable where Polish or Russian influences have gained their access. The author of this study himself saw this decline twenty-two years ago in the western [Pg v]Ukrainian government of Kholm and Podlakhia, where he was born and brought up in his early childhood. He well remembers how in that part of the country the two foreign cultures wrangled with each other in an attempt to strangle the ancient Ukrainian culture. The Russian culture, by way of the state school system, and the Polish culture by means of the Polish Latin Catholic church wherein Polish national propaganda had its mainstay; both endeavored to deprive the Ukrainian peasantry of their nationality by forcing on them silly imitations of the alleged “higher” culture. It causes the author great pain to recall how the Polish landlords and priests have gradually made the good-natured Ukrainian peasants abandon their “pagan” ritual, Easter and Christmas folk songs and hymns; their beautiful out-of-door ceremonials, weddings, and christenings, which are inseparably connected with singing, changed their aspect to a great extent in the above mentioned Ukrainian territories. Polish religious songs may be more numerous, [Pg vi]but the Ukrainian folk-songs thus lost under the forceful introduction of the Polish “Kultura” is a whole treasure lost to the local population—because the Ukrainian folk songs are unequalled, incomparable with any others in the world.
[Pg 1]
Various peoples have different traditions and beliefs as to the origin of the folk songs. The ancient Greeks thought that songs were composed by the gods themselves, and all the famous singers claimed their parentage from the gods.
The author of the ancient Ukrainian-Ruthenian[1] poem—“Slovo o Polku Ihorevi” (The Lay of the War-Ride of Ihor[2]) relating the expedition of Prince Ihor upon the Mongolian Polovtzi—mentions some great singer Boyan,[3] “the grandson of god Veles,” who composed beautiful epic poems about the activities of the [Pg 2]ancient Ruthenians. The renowned Ukrainian Kobzar[4], that is, a singer (composer) and player on the bandore, Ostap Veresay, who sang with profound emotion the beautiful historic songs, was wont to say that songs come from God Himself.[5] Even in most recent times the Kobzars and singers, whether feeble old men or cripples, when they appear at bazars and church festivals are treated with highest respect. The people believe that the singers, especially the composers, are exceptionally beloved and endowed by God with talent to express the feeling of a rational human soul, common to all mankind; to move men to pity, charity and love of God and one’s neighbor; to proclaim the manifold human activities and [Pg 3]thus instruct and educate weak human nature, uplifting men mentally and morally.
There is something in Ukrainian songs that attracts the entire being of those who understand the words; nay, those who happen to hear Ukrainian melodies are captured by the force of their expression of mirth and gayety, but principally by that of sadness and resignation. They teach us meditation concerning ourselves and appreciation of others’ dispositions and ailments; they teach us to love the truth and abhor falsehood; they teach us to love mankind, one’s native tongue and country; they produce noble aspiration, a spiritual conception of man’s existence; they develop the sense of beauty and art.
[1] Ruthenian or Ruthen is the Greek form for Rusin or Rusitch—the original name for Ukrainian; for the last few decades it was applied to the Ukrainians of Galicia, Bukovine and Hungary. It now becomes obsolete.
[2] Translation of the Word of Igor’s Armament was made by Prof. A. Petrunkevitch of Yale University; published in “Poet Lore,” 1919.
[3] Prof. John D. Prince of Columbia University wrote a dissertation on Troyan-Boyan, published by Am. Phil. Society.
[4] Kobzar is a player on kobza or bandura which is a Ukrainian national instrument being used most frequently in the accompaniment of recitations; derived from Lat. pandura, Gr. πανδοῦρα; an instrument of the god Pan. Usually a blind elderly man, lover of the people, nature and song, gifted with great talent for emotional singing. Kobzars knew the songs by heart.
[5] Ostap Veresay, one of the many famous Kobzars from whom Kulish, Rusov, Chubinsky, Lysenko, etc.—the Ukrainian scientists, ethnologists and composers—copied the historic songs—epics, called Dumy in Ukrainian. Dr. Filaret Kolessa: “Ukrainski Narodni Dumy,” Lviv, 1920, p. 58.
[Pg 4]
Throughout the vast Ukrainian territory—irrespective of various forceful political allegiances, foreign influence and domination in the past—the same motives, airs, wording and other peculiarities are found in all Ukrainian folklore, although there may be some dialectal differences, which, however, are the least noticeable in songs. This of course only goes to affirm the one Ukrainian national soul of the forty-five million Ukrainians who in the past unfortunately were divided for centuries by surrounding foreign powers. A Ukrainian may have forgotten his native language and may speak the Russian, Polish, Slovak, Rumanian, Madyar or German—but he expresses his soul in his native, incorrupt language of song; the songs were so deeply impressed upon his soul by his mother at the cradle that he never forgets [Pg 5]them; on the contrary we notice such an anomaly that these beautiful, affectionate songs are being sung by Russians and Poles, who otherwise may hate everything that savors of Ukrainism; one may hear these so-called “Little Russian”[1] songs chanted in the heart of Warsaw, Petrograd and Moscow by the foreigners themselves. It is said that wherever the Ukrainian song is once heard its charm enchants the listeners and creates in them the desire to learn the air at least. Other Slavic nationalities are well acquainted with Ukrainian songs and melodies; it is said that in Canada, where Ukrainians are quite numerous, a great many of the English and French speaking population love to sing Ukrainian songs.
[1] Little Russian is an artificial name introduced by Peter the Great, Czar of Russia, in order to Russianize the Ukrainians the more effectively.
[Pg 6]
Quite many among the songs treat about the Ukrainian Cossack life, their love affairs, heroic deeds, courage and raids on Russians, Poles, Tartars and Turks. There are songs about general heroic deeds—the epopees—which are much older than the Cossack period. There are ritual and religious songs, the Kolyady or Christmas and New Year carols, the Eastern songs; the occasional holiday and festive songs; the spring, Kupalo and Obzhynkovi; political and patriotic songs; soldier, Cossack and recruit songs; the songs of the Cossack Sitch and Sokol (Falcon), hymns and marches which are stately and martial in character; historic and traditional songs; the Chumak songs composed by waggoners or drivers who traded in salt and fish; professional songs and ballads; Kolomeyky[1] [Pg 7]or the brisk, lively tunes and love words, originated in the vicinity of the city of Kolomya, Ukrainian East Galicia; wedding songs; burial songs; baptismal songs. But most numerous and diverse are the love songs; their multitude of airs, difference of shades and depth of sentiment is as varied and beautiful as the fragrant flowers of Ukraine. We must certainly distinguish the religious from the secular songs, for there are many of the former ones used exclusively in the church and home by the faithful. Their purpose is the glory of God and of his faithful servants—the saints—whose good works or miracles are being celebrated.
It is only in the rarest cases that the author of a celebrated popular song may be traced; as a rule the authors of Ukrainian folk songs are unknown, but the beauty, strength and popularity of their words and airs demonstrate that they were real masters of human souls who [Pg 8]either lived themselves through what they afterwards sang or else their intelligent, susceptible minds keenly felt the heart’s emotions of others; they were the nation’s long forgotten philosophers, although the simplicity of their verse and contents show that these authors were simple, kind-hearted, themselves. It may be that some of them were accomplished scholars, but through many centuries their productions underwent such a metamorphosis through oral transmission by the people that they no longer show signs of erudition.
It quite often happens that because these songs reflect so much individual and national suffering, the singers, particularly women and girls, sob while they sing; they cry while singing about a dramatic love affair which usually ends with death of the lover Cossack or with the captivity of his fiancee.
There are some ancient songs antedating Christianity officially introduced in Ukraine by St. Vladimir in 988, and these songs are sung with as great an interest as if they were recent [Pg 9]compositions. They have to do chiefly with the pagan worship of the natural forces and celestial bodies, by the ancient Ukrainians; some of them are sung side by side with the Christian productions of later date, on various religious occasions. Ukrainian philologists and ethnologists such as Maxime Drahomaniv, Pantaleymon Kulish, P. Chubinsky, Michael Maximovitch, A. Metlinsky, I. Holovatsky have recorded many hundreds of these songs, most of which have been published; but it is said that at least another half of these popular songs have not been as yet collected and written down.
[1] Kolomeyka, a short form of song, composed of two verses, fourteen syllables; it makes up a complete thought; it is being produced continually by the common people. Sometimes a few of these stanzas are linked together. Most of the truths of life are expressed in this form of people’s poetry.
[Pg 10]
(a) Most of these songs are from the obscure pre-Christian era—expressing the adoration of natural forces, especially of the celestial bodies. Svaroh was the god of heaven and earth. Dazhboh was god of the sun; Perun was god of the thunder bolt; Stryboh was god of the winds; Zoria, the star goddess, and numerous other gods in whose honor hymns were sung at the appointed time. About the most important were the Kolyady in honor of the birth of the sun in the spring, as the life-giver to all. The deification of the sun as the most potent factor in the Universe was the fundamental religion. The word Kolyada[1] is derived from Kolo or Koleso, meaning a wheel, because the sun appears [Pg 11]to be a round, shining wheel. These songs were recited about the end of December at the winter solstice when the god-sun begins to prevail over the darkness. They are generally sung now as the Christmas carols, both at home and church, by troups of boys and girls carrying a beautifully decorated star with a lighted candle inside, going to the windows of every home in the village, and expressing their wishes to all inmates, whereupon many gifts are handed in response therefor:
(b) The Shchedrivky were also the sacred lyrics, hymns to honor and entreat the god of warmth. Shchedry means liberal, bounteous, as the god-sun was considered such. Nowadays these carols are sung at the New Year’s Eve, and during the coming week, when various customary celebrations are taking place, and a rich feast is served; it is as it were a repetition of the Christmas Eve. The forces of nature and heavenly objects are usually personified, and even often referred to as opulent husbandmen or landladies, who give bounteously to all that sing them a pæan:
(c) The Vesnyanky, or spring songs (Vesna-spring) are the celebration of the radiant god over the dark ones. They are sung at the Easter time and in Spring generally and imply a great amount of love, courtship (romance), common instincts in life of mankind and nature’s influence on man. In some parts of Ukraine an effigy representing the god of cold and winter, Kostruboh, is burned on top of a hill with spring songs (Easter songs), dances and general rejoicing accompanying the rite. Some ethnologists think that the Ukrainians worshipped the goddess of spring, Vesna [Pg 14](Spring) being analogical to the ancient Indian Vasana or Huli (changed into the Ukrainian Hala), hence another name for the spring songs Hahilky:
[Pg 16]
(d) The Kupalsky Pisny—are songs sung in commemoration of Kupalo, a festivity dating from immemorial pre-Christian times. It is not certain whence the word comes, but etymology would show that it is derived from kupaty—to bathe or to swim. The feast of Kupalo is observed on the 24th of June, which falls on the Christian birth of St. John the Baptist, according to the Julian calendar. The bathing here has reference to the sun and its rays; the spring and summer rain, the thunderstorm, the lightnings, etc., during which time the earth, as it were, bathes and will surely produce abundant fruit in the autumn as the result of their action. Although primarily it is the adoration of the god-sun and all the good forces, yet secondarily, [Pg 17]it is the worship of Marena, the goddess of the clouds, waters and death, for now she gradually prevails over the god-sun who decreases in his power after the twentieth of June. Christian piety has connected this pagan festival with St. John the Baptist, introduced names of some saints in the lore and in some instances even changed the name of goddess Marena into christianized name Maryna (Mary). At Kupalo’s ceremonies the effigies representing the god-sun and goddess Marena are usually thrown into the water and a great entertainment follows: the girls in wreath dance with the boys around a fire, all sing and foretell their fortune:
(e) The Obzhinkovi pisni—the harvest songs, from obzhinaty—to harvest around, to reap [Pg 19]around, and finish the harvest—are the expression of thanksgiving to gods of bounty and harvest for the benefits received; they are sung both on thanksgiving days and on the way to and from the work of harvesting, while it lasts; these gods have been consequently changed into hospitable husbandmen and house-wives:
[1] Some claim that “Kolyada” is composed of the word “ko”—to, and the name for the goddess Lada, which denotes the turning of one’s prayers towards goddess Lada.
[2] Diminutive. The translation of the following cycle of songs and folklore are my own and original, unless stated otherwise. Some of the quoted songs are those I remember from my childhood in Ukraine; others were suggested by friends, or translated from books of references or song books.
[3] Kutia is the boiled wheat with honey for Christmas Eve; one of the indispensable dishes.
[4] Shchedryk, one who sings Christmas or New Year’s carols.
[5] Diminutive, feminine for Shchedryk.
[6] * Songs marked thus were suggested to me in Ukrainian by a lady sixty-five years of age, a Pole by origin married to a Ukrainian; Madame Zazulak of 951 Washington Ave., Bronx, New York City.
[7] Lviv—Lemberg, Capital of Ukrainian Galicia, written in other Slavic languages—Lvov.
[8] The evening.
[Pg 20]
With the introduction of obligatory Christianity by Vladimir the Great, the grand duke and ruler of Ukraine and other territories which later developed into the white Ruthenian and Russian countries respectively, at Kiev in 988 (unofficial Christianity existed in Ukraine centuries before; even Olha—St. Helen—Vladimir’s grandmother, had been formally baptized at Constantinople on her visit thither), the production of heathen ritual and religious folk songs gradually diminished, for it was in the interest of the Church to eliminate these pagan beliefs; or, where this appeared difficult, this pagan lore and ceremonial were merged with Christian tenets, other personalities having been substituted; the Christian songs appear to be less indigenous and original than the ancient pagan songs.
[Pg 21]
(a) Songs from the age of Ukrainian Principalities of the earliest date.
These songs may be justly styled the political annals that celebrate the exploits of the Ukrainian heroes who formed and consolidated the Ukrainian Kiev Empire of the Ruriks that ruled until the Kiev Ukraine fell under the foreign Lithuanian domination of the Gedymins after Ukraine was weakened by constant Tartar invasions from the East. For almost two centuries did the Lithuanian grand dukes hold their sceptre over Ukraine, but they adopted the ancient Ukrainian culture and language. In the vicissitude of fate both Ukraine and Lithuania were forced to unite with Poland in the so-called “Union of Lublin” in 1569. The subject of these songs is the heroism and chivalry of the Ukrainian princes and their retainers while advancing upon foreign cities and distant lands.
The lyric-epic poem: “Slovo o Polku Ihorevi”—The Lay of the War-Ride of Ihor, or [Pg 22]the Word of Ihor’s[1] Armament, is the best and most famous production of the Ukrainian antiquity written by an unknown poet of the twelfth century, such as no other nation possesses.[2]
[Pg 23]
Were it not meet, brothers, to begin the sorrowful lay of the war-ride of Ígor, Ígor Svyatoslávlitch after the old fashion?
But let us picture events of our own day, not fancies in the manner of Boyàn.
For whenever inspired Boyàn wished to make a song of praise, he would let his fancy stray, now as a gray wolf over the ground, now as an eagle among the clouds.
Recalling the strife of olden days, he flew ten falcons against a flock of swans and whatsoever swan was reached first, would sing the praise of old Yaroslàv or of old brave Mstislàv who slew Redédya in sight of the hosts of Kosógi, or of comely Romàn son of Svyatoslàv.
Yet were they not ten falcons that Boyàn flew against a flock of swans, but his impassioned fingers with which he struck the live strings and these of themselves sounded forth the praise of the princes?
Let us then, brothers, begin this tale of the times from old Vladímir unto our own Ígor who girded his mind with strength, steeled his heart with courage and filled with the lust of battle, led his brave hosts against the Pólovtzy in defense of the Russian land....[4]
[Pg 24]
Galician Osmomysl Yaroslav! High art thou seated upon thy gold-wrought throne.
With thine unyielding hosts thou hast borne the weight of the Hungarian mountains.
Thou hast blocked the path of the king, closed the gates of the Danube, hurling bolts from thy clouds, sending forth ships as far as the Danube.
In storm thy thunder reaches unto many lands.
Thou openest the gates of Kiev, strikest from the golden throne of thy sires, sultans and distant lands.
Strike, sir, Kontchàk the Pagan nomad, for the Russian[5] land, for the wounds of Ígor, the valiant son of Svyatoslàv!
Boyàn, bard of olden times, sang the encounters of Svyatoslàv and of Yaroslàv and of Olèg, saying, “Though evil it is for thee, oh, head lacking body, [Pg 25]worse farest thou, body without head,”—Russian[6] land without Ígor.
The sun shines in the sky, prince Ígor in the Russian land.
Maidens sing on the Danube.
Their voices are borne across the sea to Kiev.
Ígor rides through Borítchev to the holy shrine of the Mother of God.
The lands rejoice; the cities are glad.
Having sung to old princes, now we shall sing to young ones, “Glory to Ígor Svyatoslávlitch, to dauntless warrior Vsévolod, to Wladímir Ígorevitch!
Hail! princes and retinue fighting Pagan hosts in behalf of the Christians!
Glory to princes and retinue! Amen![7]
(b) Of somewhat later period are the Ukrainian Dumas.[8] Stanislaus Sarnicki, a Polish historian, in his “Annals” of 1506 is the first one to mention the Ukrainian Dumas, saying that [Pg 26]“The Ruthenians call these elegies their Dumas.”[9]
Dumas of the earlier period are of lyric-epic character, as well as didactic; they resemble the popular Ukrainian folk songs, and may have been derived from the ancient ones. The later period Dumas, from the middle of the XVII Century, are less poetic; they are realistic, humorous and with traits of sarcasm. They differ from the folk songs, and may not be considered verse in its strict sense, in that they are, as it were, a free improvisation without rhythm or rhyme, with constantly changing, irregular succession of arsis and thesis (beats), sung in melodious recitation, accompanied by the Kobza. There are twenty Ukrainian national Dumas of the older, and nine of the later period with many variants (same themes but different readings). There are some dumas falsified by the Russificators, which are easily distinguished [Pg 27]from the genuine ones by contents and form, which we do not take account of here.[10]
(c) Some of the recent historical songs are:
[1] The Ukrainian pronunciation and transliteration into English of the name of the heroic Ukrainian prince is Ee-h-o-r, not Ee-g-o-r, Ihor not Igor as is faultily pronounced and written by Russians and their uncritical followers. The only excuse for the Russians is that their alphabet does not possess the equivalent English h sound; they pronounce the Ukrainian г = h as g. The Ukrainian g is ґ, which again does not exist in Russian.
[2] It is a pity that until recently both the Russians (Moscovites) and some foreigners unacquainted with historical facts presented the “Word” as being “Russian” instead of Ukrainian. The language of the oldest, mistakingly so called “Russian” literature is chiefly old Slavonic with ample admixture of the early Ukrainian. The earliest Ukrainian literature written during the Kiev period of the Ukrainian Empire, which also included the present European Russia and White Ruthenia, differs linguistically from the literary documents written on the Moscovite territory at the same period. Until Peter the Great the Ukrainians and the Russians were officially recognized as two different nations with two entirely different languages. He introduced the “theory of the union of the Russian nation,” and styled the Ruthenians or Ukrainians as the “Little Russians” with a “Russian” dialect. True, that the Ukrainians were also called “Russi” and “Rossi,” but it meant not the present day Russians (Moscovites); the historic word was “borrowed” from the Ukrainians, to say it gently.
[3] As translated from the ancient Ruthenian-Ukrainian by Prof. A. Petrunkevitch of Yale University in “Poet Lore,” 1919. The reader is also referred to Prof. Leo Wiener’s “Anthology of Russian Literature,” Vol. I, p. 80 ff., G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York and London. Giving the translation of Prof. Petrunkevitch, the author of this study disagrees with him as well as with many others who translated the words: Руський, Русь, Русич as if identical with the modern “Russia” and “Russian.” The author’s position is supported by the self consciousness of the entire over-forty-million Ukrainian nation as well as by Ukrainian and foreign historical authorities.
[4] За Землю Руськую,—Za Zemlu Rus(i)kuyu means for the land of the Rusyns—Rusyts(i) or Rusytch(i), these words having been Latinized into Ruthenus (Ruthenia) in the 9th century; another appellation was introduced in the 12th century: “Ukraine,” Ukrainians, which latter name was generally adopted by all the Ukrainians during the struggle for independence with Poles and Russians in the 17th century similarly as the name “Rumanians” replaced the former names Moldavians and Wallachians; the word Rusyn means Ruthenian; is still locally used by the Ukrainians. Since the “Word” was written in Ukraine by the Ukrainians it is self evident that this precious ancient Ruthenian masterpiece as well as many others cannot be and is not the “Russian” literature; and that therefore “Земля Руська” means the Ruthenian or Ukrainian land of the princes of Kiev and Galicia—Volhynia. Russian is always and invariably written by double ss, whereas Ruthenian is invariably written by one s with a sign of softening added ь: Русин adjective: Руський equals Ruthenian—Ukrainian.
The Russians (Moscovites) wrongly claim the foundation of the Kiev empire to themselves; they have fed, so to say, on the ancient Ukrainian culture, language, state and civilization which were already known historically in 8th century, while the Russian state began forming itself in 13th century around Suzdal and Moscow by the amalgamation of the Slavic tribes of Radimitches and Viyatitches with the Mongolian Finns.
These facts are undisputed by all modern unbiased students of history. That the Russians succeeded in overwhelming the Ruthenians temporarily and have favorably impressed the world as the inheritors of the ancient Ukrainian empire—ah!—it is another story, a story of ruthless oppression and extermination of the Ukrainian people and their independent state.
[5] Vide supra, the note on Руська Земля—Rus(i)ka Zemla, which, when rightly translated means the Ruthenian land, i. e., the Ukrainian land, and not the modern “Russian.”
[6] Ruthenian—Ukrainian land.
[7] The Word of the Armament of Ihor being an epic poem, the author of this study fancies that instead of prose—like continuation of sentences, each sentence should be written separately forming a strophe.
[8] Duma—dumaty means to think, to meditate on some deeds of the times of yore. They are the Ukrainian epopees, epic rhapsodies about heroic deeds, usually of Cossacks in their struggle against the Turks, Tartars, Russians and Poles. Equivalent in meaning to the Bilinas (bylo byti means that which has happened, been done or performed) which though of Ukrainian origin, became known as exclusively Russian epic poetry. One must remember that the “Word of the Armament of Igor” is called the “Ukrainian Duma of the XII Century” by all Ukrainian ethnographers.
[9] Ivan Erofeiv: “Ukrainian Dumas (Epos) and Their Arrangement” (Redaction); Zapiski Naukovago Tovaristva, Kiev, 1909, VI.
Annales sive de origine et gestis Polonorum,—“... elegias, quas dumas vocant.”
[10] Dr. Filaret Kolessa: “Ukrainski Narodni Dumy,” Prosvita, Lviv (Lemberg), 1920, p. 63 ff.
[11] Nicholas Potocki (pronounced Pototski), a Polish military leader in the war against the Ukrainians in 1648, badly defeated by Chmielnitsky.
[12] Figuratively: Ukraine.
[Pg 32]
After the Union of Lithuania with Poland, whereby Ukraine was also forced to join the latter, the Ukrainian and Lithuanian nobility became gradually Polonized as a consequence of Polish political tactics and repressions—so much so that the Ukrainian people felt the necessity of providing for some measure of national defence. As a consequence of this feeling there arose on the lower left bank of the river Dnipro (Dnieper), a Ukrainian knighthood—the Cossacks who at the end of the Fifteenth century organized in Sitch under Ostap Dashkevitch, and consequently organized into a strong military force under Prince Demetrius [Pg 33]Wyshnevetsky in 1515, and became the bulwark of the Ukraine against Turks, Poles and Russians. This excellent Ukrainian organization, called also the Zaporoghian Cossacks or Sitch[2] (since the first settlements were located beyond the cataracts of the lower Dnipro and on the islands of the River)—was the first to revolt against the mediaeval intolerable economic conditions and national oppression by Poles; insurrections followed in quick succession under Ataman[3] Kosinsky, 1592; Loboda and Nalywayko in 1596; Tryasylo, 1630; Pavliuk, 1637, until Bohdan Chmelnitsky, one of the greatest leaders of the modern times, proclaimed war for independence in 1648. The entire nation became insurgent. The Poles were defeated many a time; Ukraine was liberated, but when Chmelnitsky saw that Turks, Poles and Russians were [Pg 34]bent either on ruling wholly or on partitioning the Ukraine, he entered a free alliance with Russia at Pereyaslav in 1654, to save Ukraine from Poles and Turks. Ukraine was promised entire freedom and independence; but soon she was again partitioned by Russia and Poland in the treaty of Andrussow (1667); at that time all freedom and rights were abrogated and serfdom gradually introduced.
The Cossacks as the flower of the Ukrainian Nation, and inheritors of glorious national traditions from the period of Princes, were always struggling for Ukraine’s independence and for the privileges of the common people, and this is the reason why the people have celebrated this era most of all. The variety of subjects is greater than in any other period; love and exploits are the main themes.
What the Cossacks were for Ukraine let this folk song demonstrate:
Terribly did the Ukrainians suffer in the Turkish Yassir.[5]
There were a very few instances in which some did abandon the Christian faith for the Turkish luxuries and became the lords and ladies of the land:
Thus many different features were dealt with in song by the people.
The terrible economic conditions of the times are deplored in folklore, showing how the Polish nobility, idle and without initiative, resigned most economic matters into the hands of the Jews—possessors, usually the liquor dealers, and inn-keepers:
[Pg 37]
Hetman Chmielnitsky ordered these outrages and abuses stopped and conditions changed, and then both the noblemen and the Jewish expropriators suffered, and both were compelled to flee from Ukraine for their lives; the populace meant revenge for the extreme suffering:
Chmeilnitsky won a few decisive battles over the Poles, for example, at Zhovti Vodi, Korsun, Pylava; annihilated a great many of them and liberated Ukraine:
But Chmielnitsky met with a heavy defeat just outside of Berestechko in 1651, solely on [Pg 39]account of the treachery on the part of the Tartar Khan whom the former summoned against the more numerous Poles and their mercenaries, so that the Poles returned to Ukraine for some time:
[1] Haydamaki is a Turkish word for a robber, a highwayman; this word was originally applied to the Ukrainian Cossack bands who inveighed guerrillas against the Turks. With the progress of time the Ukrainian peasants rebelled against the Polish rule of nobility and the economic oppression and expropriation by Poles and Jews in Ukraine—applied this word to themselves as a meaning for self-defense.
[2] Sitch (or kish-basket) was a camp of the Ukrainian Cossacks of the Dnipro River, who inhabited the country beyond the porohi (thresholds), i. e., rapids or cataracts of Dnipro; derived from “sitchi” or “sikti,” to hew or cut down, because the virgin forests were hewn and extensive territory cleared up and prepared for cultivation.
[3] Ataman or Hetman are words corresponding to the English Head-man; he was the elected chief or president of the Ukrainian Cossacks and of the entire Ukrainian people.
[4] Lysenko: Collection of Ukrainian Songs, Vol. IV, p. 11.
[5] Yassir, a Turkish imprisonment, captivity, detention.
[6] Antonovitch and Drahomanow: “The Historic Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. I, p. 88.
N. B. The translations made by the author of this study are free, without any consideration to rhythm or rhyme, but just so as to convey the thought alone; such a translation in many instances is rendered difficult on account of so many idiomatic expressions implied in the Ukrainian folklore.
[7] Antonovitch and Drahomanow: “The Historic Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. I, p. 230.
[8] Antonovitch and Drahomanow: “The Historic Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. II, pp. 20–22.
[9] Antonovitch and Drahomanow: “The Historic Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. II, pp. 20–25.
[10] Antonovitch and Drahomanow: “The Historic Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. II, pp. 20–25.
[11] Lach is another name for a Pole; supposed to be derived from a legendary Polish King Lech.
[12] Perebeynis or Kryvonis, a famous Cossack Colonel.
[13] Ibidem, Vol. II, p. 114.
[14] Antonovitch and Drahomanow: “The Historic Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. II, p. 50.
[Pg 40]
Once more, after the Union with Russia at Pereyaslav, the whole nation arose against the Moscovites under the leadership of Hetman Mazepa, who made a covenant with Charles XII, King of Sweden; but both were defeated near Poltava, Ukraine, in 1709. Peter the Great and Catherine (II) the Great abrogated all the liberties of the Ukrainian nation and destroyed the last camp of the Cossacks in 1700 and in 1775 razed all Ukrainian schools, and forbade speaking and praying in Ukrainian. It is estimated that 170,000 Cossacks perished at the compulsory building of St. Petersburg, making canals and general improvements in Northern Russia, while hundreds of thousands perished in Siberia, dying from disease and hunger!
The sad condition of affairs owing to the economic slavery, and compulsory labor or servitude, that were gradually imposed by the Russian and Polish land owners, caused the Haydamaki war or the peasant uprising first under Simon Paley who desired to reunite the Left and Right-Bank Ukraine in 1704, and then in 1768 under the two national leaders Gonta and Zalizniak, who were the authors of the renowned massacre at Uman (1768); it was a chain of bloody reprisals of the people for the many abuses and sufferings:
[Pg 42]
(e) Songs of the Servitude and Compulsory Army Service.
After the partition of Poland (1772–1795), the entire Ukraine—except East Galicia, Bukovina and Hungarian Ruthenia which fell to Austria—went under the Russian yoke, and Catherine the Great razed the last remnant of the Zaporoghian Sitch in 1775, just when the United States were struggling for independence; both Russia and Austria began recruiting soldiers from among the Ukrainians; thus, recruited soldiers had to serve twenty five years in the army and one was never certain of seeing home and relatives again; life was lost for such [Pg 43]a one forever, for if not killed, he returned home old and maimed.
Just then the servitude or compulsory labor and slavery were introduced in Ukraine with all the hardships, for, while the feudal system and servitude were much older, they received the sanction and protection of both these governments again:
[Pg 44]
(f) Songs about Freeing the Peasants from Servitude.
Austria, in order to acquire the sympathy and support of the peasantry of all nationalities, officially abrogated the servitude in 1848, and Russia in 1861, mostly on account of democratic principles, disseminated by Ukrainian savants and writers best expressed by tenets of the Cyryllo-Methodius Society of Kiev; this caused a great jubilation among the Ukrainian peasantry, uttered in numerous songs:
[1] Antonowitch and Drahomanow: “The Historic Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. II, p. 40.
[2] Antonovitch and Drahomanow: “The Historic Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. II, p. 40.
[3] Ibidem, Vol. II, p. 114.
[4] Drahomaniw: “Political Songs of the Ukrainian Nation,” Vol. II, p. 114.
[5] Drahomanow: “New Ukrainian Songs about Community Affairs” p. 34.
[6] Holowacky: “National Songs of Galician and Hungarian Ruthenia (Ukraine),” Vol. I, p. 16.
[7] Lysenko: “A Collection of Ukrainian Songs,” Vol. VI, p. 7.
[8] Drahomanow: “New Ukrainian Songs about Community Affairs,” p. 36.
[9] Ibidem, p. 25.
[Pg 46]
(a) The Chumak[1] songs. Chumaks or merchants were well organized in groups and eagerly protected by the Ukrainian forces before attacks of nomadic tribes, as ones who were indispensably necessary for the progress and improvement of Ukraine. They were guarded by the Cossacks who collected toll from them.
Many of them met with ill luck. Here is a stanza from a song about the pair of oxen, that drove home alone, leaving their dead master far away from home:
(b) Quite numerous are the songs about the servants and small rural farmers, that treat of the general home life, the toil and blessing connected with agriculture:
(c) There are but few Artisan songs in Ukrainian, since the city’s population was composed largely of a foreign element and was not so creative:
[1] Chumak is a Tartar word for a waggoner, carter, carrier or driver; this word became identical with a trader or merchant. The Ukrainian peasants occupied especially with import and export of grain, textiles, dry fish, salt and other useful articles in wagons called mazha, were named Chumaks.
[2] Ivan Kolessa: Ethnographic collections.
[3] Ivan Kolessa: Ethnographic collection, Vol. XI, p. 242.
[4] Lysenko: “Collection of Ukrainian Songs,” Vol. III, p. 80.
[Pg 49]
(a) The oldest songs and ones that give a good insight into home life are the Ritual Songs, and especially the Wedding Songs. In these we see traces of the so-called Matriarchal Age, when the mother was considered the head of a family, which denotes great antiquity for these songs; in most of them the father is rarely mentioned. The main subject is the grief and reluctance of the bride to leave her parents, relatives and home. It is a litany, so to speak, of all the happiness of childhood and virginity and fear for the uncertain future. In these songs, and even at the present day, the people call the bridegroom a prince; the bride, a princess; the best man, ushers and bridesmaids,—the high nobles, etc. The ceremonies are antique, very religious and of great variety. In some parts of Ukraine there still exist the reminiscences of the ancient times when candidates for marriage [Pg 50]stole girls for wives, or bought them for a considerable amount of money. This was done away with at the introduction of Christianity.
The author remembers well from his childhood, the wedding rites in his own village of Choroshchinka, in the western part of Ukraine, Podlakhia (Cholm Government). These ceremonies were identical with those of centuries ago. The following brief description may facilitate in the understanding of the beauties of a Ukrainian rural wedding.
After the bans of the marriage are proclaimed, the bridegroom, usually from another village, is preparing in his own home for the marriage reception, while the parents of the bride are doing their best to get ready for the wedding. On Saturday afternoon the bride, with wreaths or flowers on her head and many ribbons hanging from her coiffure, accompanied by some of her maids, goes from house to house kissing elderly persons on the face and hands, with view of obtaining their blessing, and asking everybody to come to the wedding. Some [Pg 51]understand that this is a mere formality and although they thank the bride and promise to come, they do not appear, unless they be very dear friends or relatives.
About seven o’clock in the evening almost all the young and middle-aged married women come to the house of the bride and make the Korovay—a wedding cake, and various other small fancy cakes, all sitting at a long family table, singing until about eleven o’clock, chanting in a kind of plaintive voice:
and other inexhaustible strains of wedding songs are sung.
In the meantime the bridesmaids are making wreaths, loosening the bride’s tresses and hair and asking the parents’ blessing. One must remember that there are songs prescribed for [Pg 52]every action. On Sunday morning the bridegroom comes with his mates and many guests in as many wagons as are needed, and brings his future wife many presents. After an introductory reception which consists of bread and salt and consequently (inseparably) some drink for the guests—the young pair kneel down before the bride’s parents, asking for blessing. For this purpose many of the oldest folks of the village (some centenarians) are invited to bless the young by making the sign of the cross over their heads. There is much crying and lamentation while the rural music plays on.
The entire gathering then starts for Mass and the marriage at the church to the accompaniment of musicians; everybody walks. The bride on her way, kisses all the older folks she meets, asking their blessing. The essence of the blessing is wishing for temporal and eternal good, and, especially, marital happiness and a numerous progeny.
After the imposing church ceremonials according to Greek Rite, on returning home, the [Pg 53]wedding party sings among others the following song:
The assembly feasts until midnight when the bride-princess is getting ready to leave her parents’ home, with all her trunks and effects,—an action called locally “Perezviny,” perhaps “Perevozyny,” meaning carrying over, transfer. The wedding continues at the bridegroom’s home for at least two days more:
(b) Cradle songs are sung by every mother who lulls her baby to sleep. These songs are very emotional because there is no language [Pg 54]in the world that is so captivating as the conversation from the heart of a mother to the part of her own body and soul:
(c) Love themes are most numerous in every walk of life. The songs relate the natural affection of sweethearts; but many of them complain of the unsteadiness and treachery of the other party, for example:
Or
(d) Songs of the Conjugal Life.
Though some celebrate the marital happiness and mutual accord, yet most of them tell of the sad disappointments we so often meet with in actual life. In them the woman’s position is attractively depicted, her superior, delicate nature, her suffering and humiliation and patience well described. There is always some third person, usually a relative, who becomes the bone of contention. It is usually the bad mother-in-law; a drunkard husband; an unfaithful husband; the elopement of a wife; unsteadiness of a wife; mistreatment of an orphan by the step-mother, etc.:
(e) Funeral Songs.
Outside of the numerous religious Christian songs about the two elements in man: material and spiritual, the eternal truth that every man must die and decompose, the reward of the soul and body for every good deed, the resurrection of the body, the second coming of Christ-God in his majesty to judge the living and the dead, there are many remnants of the ancient pagan singing, and soliloquy. One might say that a [Pg 57]Ukrainian peasant woman, on losing her child or other beloved person, keeps on crying uninterruptedly for three days—the time prescribed for the body to lie in state. She usually cries loud with a wailing, plaintive air that moves to tears all the visitors. It is said that the Ukrainians are the most emotional of the Slavic peoples. While she wrings her hands, she invokes the Deity, clamoring:
In most of these crying monologues, there is rhythm and rhyme. No doubt in many instances there is the spontaneous outburst of poetic phraseology, but many are sung alike by all. Now, taking into consideration the frequency of diminutives[7] for the dear departed persons and [Pg 58]possessions and the intensitives for the grave, death, sickness, calamity—one sees a great poetic beauty in these expressions of despondency:
[1] Korets, a measure, a bushel.
[2] Collections of Osyp Rozdilsky.
[3] Collections of Osyp Rozdilsky.
[4] Ivan Kolessa: Ethnographic collection, Vol. II, p. 118.
[5] Lysenko: “Collection of Ukrainian Songs,” Vol. VII, p. 16. Steppes of Ukraine are the extensive plains not unlike the American prairies, but now rendered very fertile.
[6] Figuratively, and in every day use a Cossack means any young man, wooer, lover or a man of courage; a Ukrainian.
[7] The frequency of diminutives used in the Ukrainian renders the language most harmonious of all Slavic tongues; a word may be used in two, five and even ten different ways.
[Pg 59]
The Ukrainians have many of the common songs whose themes are proper to all the rest of the world’s peoples—songs that are the common treasury of mankind; such as songs of the mediaeval chivalric knighthood, or adopted according to the characteristic views and inclinations of the Ukrainians. The general, universal ballads were remodeled into typical Ukrainian; popular heroes and fictitious persons introduced so as to render them indigenous. Following are some of the general subjects:
1. A widow and her daughter by mistake marry their own son and brother.
2. Sweethearts drown themselves because parents opposed their marriage.
3. A man commits suicide on the grave of his wife whom he killed through misunderstanding.
4. A father sells his daughter to bandits, while her brother rescues her.
[Pg 60]
5. Foreigners seduce a girl, promising to marry her, but they burn her having tied her to a pine tree.
6. A woman marries another man, thinking her husband to have died in war; he appears at her wedding.
7. A Cossack kills his perfidious sweetheart.
8. A girl poisons her perfidious fiancé.
A mother is the cause of the death of her grand-child and daughter-in-law through her severity. The daughter-in-law had been compelled to do most of the work; she went to reap the corn on Sunday leaving her child asleep. Being in a hurry to milk the cows, she forgot the infant in the field. Being reminded of her child by the mother-in-law, she ran wildly and was told by an eagle that three hawks—“nurses”—have killed the child:
In her despair the young mother returned home asking the mother-in-law to hand her a knife, ostensibly to cut some cloth, but stabbed herself therewith, exclaiming:
[Pg 61]
[1] Lysenko: “Collection of Ukrainian Songs,” Vol. V, p. 17.
[Pg 62]
Most of the Ukrainian folk songs are, as a rule, of ancient date. The Serbs are the nearest to the Ukrainians of all Slavs with the quantity, contents and quality of their folk songs.
The leading ideology of these songs is the constant moralization, desire for liberty, and protest against violence. This popular poetry is the true picture of a Ukrainian soul that consciously strives to better conditions of self and of all humanity. Such a nation—such songs!
One of the greatest authorities on the subject, Drahomaniv, says that Ukrainian popular poetry is more of historic than of fictitious and fabulous origin.
Ukrainian folk song naturally had a great influence on national literature. In 1819, Prince Tsertelev published a collection of Ukrainian historic songs. Michael Maksymovich, [Pg 63]a Ukrainian professor at the Moscow University, published another compilation of songs in 1827. Among the greatest students and collectors were Ambrose Metlynsky, 1854;[1] Pantaleymon Kulish, 1856; Nicholas Kostomariv, 1859; Alexander Rusov and Paul Chubinsky, 1874; Jacob Holowatsky, Rev. Markian Shashkevich, 1837 (in East Galicia); Osyp Fedkovich, 1860 (in Bukovina).
These collections of folklore made a decisive turn in national literature. Latin and Church Slavonic were abandoned in writing, national consciousness awoke and the Ukrainian masses began the struggle for liberty and independence, both under the Russian and Austro-Hungarian governments. Ivan Kotlarevsky was the first one to introduce the pure living Ukrainian language in his works, 1798, without an admixture of Russianized and Slavonic words. It was this very source that produced the immortal poet Taras Shevchenko, 1814–1861, who is classed [Pg 64]with the German Schiller and Goethe, the English Shakespeare, the Polish Mickiewicz and the Russian Pushkin. Among the greatest students and ethnologists of Ukraine are two Kiev professors, Volodymyr Antonovich and Michaylo Drahomaniv, who collected many volumes of Ukrainian folklore; there is a host of other men of erudition, writers and poets who devoted their lives to the investigation of the Ukrainian folklore. Among these were Potebnia, Zhytecky, Manzhura, Hrinchenko, Lesia Ukrainka, Filaret Kolessa, Ohorowych, Horlenko, Sumtsow, Malynka, Kalash, Martynovych, Slastion, Speransky, Domanytsky, Tkachenko-Petrenko, Lysenko, Yerofeew, Zelenyna, Rubets, Marko Vovchok, Franko, Lomykowsky, Tomachynsky, Iwashchenko. Excellent school books of latest date, with treatises on the subject were written by Dr. M. Pachivsky, Prof. Lukachivsky, A. Barvinsky, Serhey Ephremov, Michael Hrushevsky. To quote the German, F. M. Bodenstedt:
[Pg 65]
“In no other country did the tree of people’s poetry produce such grand fruit; nowhere else did the spirit of a nation reflect so vividly and forcefully in songs as with the Ukrainians. What a sensitive breeze of sorrow, what immaculate human feelings are expressed in these songs sung by a Cossack in a foreign land! What a subtle delicacy in part with heroic force, masculine strength pervade his love songs! A special attention should be called to the tact and purity, as the chief factors of these songs. One cannot help but admit that a nation which sings such songs and is so fond of them—must be far above a low degree of cultural development.... The Ukrainian language is the most melodious among all the Slavic tongues, having great musical properties.”[2]
A Serbian, V. Lukich has this to say: “The Ukrainian language is distinguished for its harmony and beauty, and is the most adaptable to music and singing among the Slavic tongues.”...
[Pg 66]
“The national poetry of the Ukrainians is the richest one in Europe; it is distinguished for its esthetic properties and poetic inspiration and harmony of wording; it contains something grand, uplifting, the essence of feeling, melancholic and invigorating.”
“... the celebrated Russian music is the music of the Ukraine, and it is the Ukrainian, Gogol, who has opened the way to the Russian romancers of genius.” (Charles Seignobos, Professor at the Sorbonne.)
A race that has such an inexhaustible source of inspiring poetry which denotes a great wealth of spirit, inborn intelligence and talented souls, shall never perish, but its aspirations to a united, free, independent national existence will be realized:
Taras Shevchenko.
[1] The years quoted refer to dates of publication of the works of these Ukrainian savants.
[2] Translation of the quotations rendered by the author of this study.
[Pg 67]
Alicht, Rudolf—Das Lied von der Heerschar Igors, Leipzig, 1895; Das südrussische Igorlied, Breslau, 1906.
Anon—Historical Poems of Little Russian People, The Saturday Review, June 5, 1875.
Annales des Nationalités—Special Ukrainian Number, March, 1913.
Annales des Sciences Politiques—September-November, 1903.
Bartlett, F. S.—Folk Songs of the Ukraine, The Commentator, April 2, 1913; The Music of the Ukrainian Folk Songs, The Musical Standard, August 30, 1913.
Bedwin, Sands—The Ukraine, London, 1914.
Bilachevsky, N.—Peasant Art in the Ukraine, The Studio, special Autumn Number, 1912.
Bodenstedt, F. M. von—Die Poetische Ukraine, 1845.
Bonmariage, A. Dr.—La Russie d’Europe.
Bulletins de la Societé d’Anthropologie de Paris, Fascicule II, Séance du 19 Mars, 1897, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1897.
Chevalier, Pierre—(translation by E. Brown) Cossacks. A discourse of the original country, manners, government and Religion of the Cossacks; with another of the Precopian Tartars; and the history of the war of the Cossacks against Poland, London, 1672.
Chodzko, A. B.—Les Chants Historiques de l’Ukraine, Paris, 1879.
Chodzko—Chants Nationaux de la Petite Russie, 1868.
Chtcherbakivsky, V.—L’Art de l’Ukraine, Kiev, 1913.
Churchill, A. J.—A Description of the Ukraine (voyages and travels), London, 1752.
[Pg 68]
Cossacks—Characteristic Sketches of the various tribes of Cossacks attached to the allied armies in the campaign of 1815; taken from life at Paris, and accompanied by historical particulars, etc., 1820.
Czoernig—Ethnographie der oesterreichischen Monarchie I-III, Wien, 1856–57.
Deroulede, Paul—L’Hetman (Drame en vers, Paris, Calman-Levy).
Dowie, Menie Muriel—A Girl in the Carpathians, (The fifth edition of this work has a valuable preface on the Hutzuls).
Drahomanov, M.—La Litterature Oukrainienne Proscrite par le Gouvernement Russe. Rapport presenté au Congrès Litteraire de Paris, 1878.
Fedortchouk, Yaroslav—Le Reveil National des Ukrainiens, Paris, 1912.
Foreign Quarterly Review, Vol. XXVI, p. 266, October-January, 1840–41.
Gogol, Nicholas—Tarass-Bulba: also St. John’s Eve, and other stories, 1887; Home Life in Russia, 1854; Cossack Tales (translated by G. Tolstoy) 1869; Tarass-Bulba (translated by J. F. Hapgood) 1888; Tarass-Bulba (translated by B. C. Baskerville) The Walter Scott Company, 1907.
Hrushevsky, Mikhailo—Geschichte des Ukrainischen Volkes, Leipzig, 1906.
III Kongress d. Internationalen Musikgesellschaft, Wien, 1909, p. 276–99—Uber den melodischen und rhythmischen Aufbau der Ukrainischen rezitierenden Gesänge, der sogennanten “Kosakenlieders.”
Konoschenko—Lysenko—Folk Songs collected by both.
Kopicinsky, A.—Chansons populaires, 1862 (printed in Latin and Cyrillic in parallel columns).
[Pg 69]
Korczak-Branicki, Xavier—La Slavie Primitive, Paris, 1879.
Leger, Louis—Le Monde Slave, Paris, 1885; Le Monde Slave, Fontainebleau, 1873.
Lipinski, C.—Chants du Peuple de Galicie, Lemberg, 1833.
Livesay, Florence, Randel—Songs of Ukraine, with Ruthenian Poems (E. P. Dutton & Co., New York, 1916).
Mérimée, Prosper—Mélanges Historiques et Littéraires.
Nestor—Chronique de Nestor, Paris, E. Leroux, 1884.
Pastorius, Joachimus—Bellum Scythico-Cosacicum, 1652.
Poet Lore, (Boston); Poetry (Chicago); The Craftsman (New York); Everyman (Edinburgh); Canada Monthly (London, Ontario); University Magazine (Montreal).
Poradowska, M.—Yaga (A Ruthenian novel, first published in La Revue des Deux Mondes, 1887).
Raffalovitch, Geo.—The Ukraine, The New Age, April 10, 1913.
Rambaud, Alfred Nicolas—La Russie Epique, Paris, 1876.
Roubetz, A.—Chansons Populaires de l’Oukraine, Moscow, 1872; Chansons Populaires Petit-Russiennes, St. Petersburg, 1875.
Rudchenko, J. Y.—Little Russian Poetry (Popular Songs of the Chumaks).
Rudnitsky, Stephen—Ukraina und die Ukrainer, Vienna, 1914; Ukraine, the Land and its People, New York City, 1918.
Russian sections of the Cambridge Modern History and Lavisso and Rambaud’s Histoire Universelle.
Scherer, Jean Benoit—Annales de la Petite-Russie, 1788.
Schultze-Gavernitz—Volkswirtschaftliche Studien aus Russland, Leipzig, 1899.
Shevchenko, Taras—Six Lyrics from the Ruthenian of T. Shevchenko, (Rendered into English verse, with biographical sketch by E. L. Voynich).
[Pg 70]
Slavonic Origin—Les Origines Slaves. Pologne et Ruthenie, 1861.
Stahl, P. J.—Maroussia (d’après une Legende de Marko Wovcok), Paris, 1879.
The Saturday Review, June 5, 1875. A Review of the Historical Poems of the Little Russian People. Edited, with notes, by V. Antonovich and M. Dragomanof.
The Saturday Review—August and September, 1912. Various Writers.
Tolstoi, Ivan—Les Antiquités de la Russie Méridionale, 1891.
Ukraine—Il Movimento Litterario Ruteno in Russia e Gallizia, 1798–1872.
[Pg 71]
Andreyko, Demetrius—Melodies of Ukraine. Six Hundred (600) Ukrainian Songs with Notes for One Voice and Complete Lyrics (Edited and Published by same), New York City, 1923. (Ukrainian).
Antonovytch, Volodymyr; Drahomaniv, Mykhaylo—Istoricheskia Piesni Malorusskago Naroda—Historic Songs of the Little Russian Nation—Kiev, Vol. I, 1874, and Vol. II, 1875.
Barsow—Slovo o Polku Igorevi, I-III, Moscow, 1887–1890.
Barwinsky, A.—Vyimky z Ukrainsko-Ruskoi Ustnoi Slovestnosty Narodnoi (Extracts from the Spoken (oral) Ukrainian-Ruthenian Folklore), Lviv, 1903.
Bezsonow—Kalieki Pierekhozhie—The Wandering Cripples, Moscow, 1863.
Borzhkovsky, N.—Lirnyky, “Kievskaya Starina,” 1889.
Chubinsky, Paul—Trudy Etnografichesko-Statisticheskoy Ekspedicii v Zapadno—Russky Kray—Works of the Ethnographico-Statistical Expedition into Western Russia—Petersburg, 1874, V, p. 468, 847, 933; (VII Vols., 1872–1878).
Domanytsky, B.—Kobzari i Lirniki Kievskoy Gubiernii, Kiev, 1904.
Drahomaniv, Mikhaylo—Novi Varianty Kobzarskykh Spiviw—New Variants of the Songs of Kobzars,—“Zhytie i Slovo”—Life and Word, 1895, III-IV, 14–34.
Drahomaniv—Politychni Pisni Ukrainskoho Naroda I, II (Political Songs of), Geneva, 1883–1885.
Erofieyev, Ivan—Ukrainski Dumy i Ikh Redaktsii—Ukrainian Epos and Their Arrangement (variants), “Memoirs of the Ukrainian Scientific Society”, Ukrainskoho Naukovoho Tovarystva, Vol. VI, Kiev, 1909.
[Pg 72]
Franko, Ivan—Studii nad Ukrainskimy Narodnimy Pisniamy—Study of Ukrainian National Songs, in “Scientific Society of Shevchenko,” Vols. 75, 76, 78, 83, 94, 95, 98.
Franko—Zhinocha Nevola u Ruskikh Pisniakh Narodnikh (Woman’s Slavery in the Ruthenian National Songs), Lviv, 1884.
Horlenko, V.—Banduryst Ivan Kryukovsky, “Kievskaya Starina,” 1882, XII, 481; Kobzary i Lirnyky, 1884; Dvie Malorusskia Dumy—Two Little Russian Epopees—“Etnograficheskoye Obozrenye” (Review), 1892, XV, 139.
Hrinchenko, B.—Etnograficheskie Materialy—Ethnographic Materials, III 692, Chernihiv, 1895–1899; Litieratura Ukrainskago Folklora, 1777–1900; Chernyhiv, 1901.
Hnatiuk, V.—Lirnyky, “Etnografichny Zbirnyk” (Collections).
Holovatsky, J.—Narodni Pisny Halytskoi i Uhorskoi Rusy—National Songs of Galician and Hungarian Ruthenia, 1863–1865.
Ivashchenko, P. S.—Zapiski Yugozap. Otd. I. R. G. Obshch. Diaries of the South-Western Division of the Russian Imperial Geographical Association, Kiev, 1874 and 1875, p. 116–29.
Kallash, V.—Dvie Malorusskia Dumy—Two Little Russian Epopees—“Etnograph. Obozr.” (Review), 1892, IV, 140–6.
Kolberg, Oskar—Piesni Ludu Ruskiego—Ruthenian Songs in “Pokucie.” (Polish).
Kolessa, F.—Ohliad Ukrainsko-Ruskoi Narodnoi Poezii (Review of), Lviv, 1905.
[Pg 73]
Kolessa, Filaret—Melodii Ukrainskikh Narodnikh Dum—Melodies of Ukrainian National Epopees. In his “Materialy do Ukrainskoi Etnoliogii” Vol. XIII-XIV, Series I and II, Lviv, 1910–1913; Ukrainski Narodni Dumy (National Epics) “Prosvita” Publishing Co., Lviv, 1920.
Kostomariv—Istoricheskoye znachenye Yuzhnorusskogo Piesiennogo Tvorchestva (Historic significance of), 1847.
Kostomariv, M.; Lomykovsky—Istoria Kozachestva v Pamiatnikakh Yuzhnorusskago Narodnago Piesiennogo Tvorchestva—History of Cossackdom in the Memoirs of the South Russian National Song Production. “Russkaya Mysl”—The Russian Thought, 1880 and 1883.
Kostomariv, N. J.—Sobranie Sochinieniy—Collection of Works of—book VIII, Vol. XXI, p. 693–932, Petersburg, 1905.
Kulish, Panteleymon—Zapiski o Yuzhnoy Rusy—Diary of South Ruthenia, I, Petersburg, 1856–1867.
Lepky, Bohdan—Struny—Antologia Nkrainskoi Poezii—From Most Ancient Times to the Present Day, “Ukrainske Slovo,” Berlin, Schöneberg, Hauptstr. II (Ukrainian).
Lukashevytch Platon—Malorossiyskia i Chervonorusskia Narodnya Dumy i Piesni—Little Russian and Red Russian[1] National Epics and Songs, Petersburg, 1836.
Lysenko, M. V.—Memoirs (Zapiski) of the South-Western Division of the Imp. Russ. Geographic Society, 1874; Musical Notations therein. (N. B.—He was first to write the airs of some Ukrainian Epics); Kharaktieristika Muzykalnykh Osobiennostiey Malorusskikh Dum i Piesien Ispolniayemykh Kobzariem Veresayem—Musical Characteristics of Little Russ. Epics and Songs sung by Kobzar Veresay; Ibidem, 1874, p. 339–66.
[Pg 74]
Maksimovytch, M.—Detto, reprinted by him, 1828; Ukrainskia Narodnya Piesni, Ukrainian National Songs, Moscow, 1834; Sbornyk Ukrainskych Pisen, A Collection of Ukrainian Songs, Kiev, 1849.
Maksymovich—Kriticheskiy Rozbor “Slova,” in “Sobranie Sochineniy,” 1880.
Malynka, A.—Prokop Chub, Perekhodniy Typ Kobzaria, “Etnograph. Obozr.”—Prokop Chub, Transitional Type of Kobzar—“Ethnographic Review,” 1892, I and IV.
Martynovych, Porfyr—Ukrainski Zapysi—Ukrainian Memoranda—“Kievskaya Starina,” 1904, II, 257–313.
Metlynsky, Ambrose—Narodnya Yuzhnorusskia Piesni—South-Russian National Songs, Kiev, 1854.
Nizhankowsky—Ukrainsko—Rusky Spiwannyk, (Collection of Songs), Lviv, 1907.
Novikov—Sbornik Piesien, St. Petersburg, 1780.
Novitsky—Malorusskia Piesni, Kharkiw, 1894.
Okhorovitch, K. F.—Kobzar Ostap Veresay in “Kievskaya Starina,” 1882, VIII, p. 259.
Potebnia, O.—Obyasnieniya Malorusskikh i Srodnykh Narodnykh Piesien—Explanation of the Little Russian and other songs related to them, Warsaw, 1883–1887.
Pypin—Istoria Russkoy Etnografii, St. Petersburg, 1891.
Rozdilsky, Osyp—Zbirnyk Ukrainskykh Pisen (Collection of Ukrainian Songs).
Rubets, A. I.—216 Narodnykh Ukrainskikh Napievov—216 Ukrainian National Songs (Melodies), Moscow, 1872.
Rudchenko—Chumatskia Narodnia Piesni, Kiev, 1874.
Rusov, Alexander; Chubynsky, Paul—Dumy i Piesni Ispolnennya Veresayem, v “Zapiskakh Yugozapadnago Otdiela Imperat. Ross. Geographicheskogo Obshchestva”—Epic Poems and Songs performed by Veresay in the “Diaries of the South-Western Division of the Russian Imperial Geographic Association,” Vol. I, Kiev, 1874, and Vol. II, 1875.
[Pg 75]
Shchurat—Z Hutzulshchiny, in “Literaturni Nacherki,” Lviv, 1913.
Shukhevich, V.—Hutzulshchina, V Vols., Lviv, 1906–1908.
Slastion, Opanas—Kobzar Mikhaylo Kravchenko i Yego Dumy (and His Epics)—“Kievskaya Starina,” 1902, V.
Sobolewsky—K Slovu o Polku Igorevi, 1916.
Sosenko, Xenofont—Pro Mistyku Hailok, Studia z Ukrainskoi Hlybyny (About the Mystics of Hahilky—Spring Songs—A study of Ukrainian Antiquity), Lviv, 1922.
Speransky, M.—Yuzhnorusskaya Piesnia i Sovremiennyye Yeya Nositeli—South-Russian Song and Her Contemporary Inheritors, Kiev, 1904.
Sreznevsky, J.—Zaporozhska Starina—The Zaporozhian Antiquity, Kharkiv, 1833–8.
Sumtsow, M.—Kolomiyki, “Kievskaya Starina,” 1886.
Sumtsow, M.—Sovremennaya Malorusskaya Ethnografia (Contemporary Little Russian Ethnography), Kiev, 1893–1897.
Sumtsow, M.—Noviy Variant Dumy ob Aleksieye Popovitchie—“Kievskaya Starina,” 1885, I, 186–91.
Svientsitsky, Ilar—Pokhoronne Holosinnie i Tserkovno Religiyna Poeziya—Funeral Dirges and Church-Religious Poetry, in “Memoirs of Ukr. Scientific Society of Shevchenko,” XCIII-IV, 1910.
Tkachenko-Petrenko, E.—Dumy v Izdaniyakh i Izsliedyvaniakh—Epics—those published and searched for, “Ukraina,” 1907, p. 144–185.
Tomachynsky, V.—Kievsky Telegraf, No. 59, 1872.
Trutowsky—Sobranie Russkikh Piesien s Notami (Collection with Music), St. Petersburg, 1776.
Tsertelev, M. A.—Malorossiyskia Piesni—Little Russian Songs, Moscow, 1827.
[Pg 76]
Tsertelev, M. A.—Opyt Sobrania Starynnykh Malorossiyskikh Piesniey, (Review of Collection of Ancient Little Russian Songs), 1819.
Tykhovsky, Jul.—Prozoyu ili Stikhami Napisano “Slovo o Polku Igorievie?”—Was the “Word of the Armament of Igor” Written in Prose or in Verses? “Kievskaya Starina,” X, 1893.
Ukrainian Scientific Society of Shevchenko, Literary Review of—Variyanty Melodiy Ukrainskykh Narodnykh Dum, Ikh Kharakterystyka i Grupovannye, CXVI, Liviv, 1913. (Melodies, Characteristics and Arrangement of); Also Epics in comparison to Songs, Verses and Funeral Dirges, CXXX, CXXXI, CXXXIV.
Viesielovsky, A.—Tri Glavy iz Istorii Poetiki—Three Chapters on History of Poetry, p. 137, Petersburg, 1899.
Vladymirov—Istoria Literary Kiivskoho Periodu—Phototypic reprint of the first edition of the “Slovo o Polku Ihorevi,” St. Petersburg, 1914.
Waclaw z Oleska—Piesni Polskie i Ruskie Ludu Galicyiskiego, Lviv, 1843.
Zakrewsky—Starosvyetski Bandurist (The Bandurist of Old), 1861–1862.
Zegota, Pauli—Piesni Ludu Ruskiego w Galicyi (Polish)—Songs of the Ruthenian People of Galicia, Lviv, 1839.
Zelenyna, D. K.—Bibliografichieskiy Ukazatiel Russkoy Etnografichieskoy Literatury o Vnieshniem Bytie Narodov Rossii. The Bibliographic Guide to Russian Ethnographic Literature concerning the External State of the Peoples of Russia in the (Zapiski) Memoirs of the Imperial Russian Geographic Association, Vol. XL, I edition, 1913, p. 255–82.
Zhdanow—Literatura Slova o Polku Igorevi, “Sochinenya,” I, St. Petersburg, 1904.
Zhytetsky, Paul; Kotlarevsky, A. A.; Lomykovsky—Mysli o Narodnikh Malorusskikh Dumakh—Thoughts about the Little Russian National Epics, 1893.
[1] Little Russian and Red Russian (Galician) names for the Ruthenians or Ukrainians according to the Russian and Polish State ideology, which appellations every conscious Ukrainian resents, because they are used for purpose of dividing the Ukrainian nation.
Possible printer’s errors in punctuation, hyphenation, spelling, and spacing were generally retained, except for changes listed below.
Cyrillic and Greek script were transcribed as printed.
Footnotes were reindexed and moved to the end of their respective chapters. Some footnote links within the text were silently moved due to odd punctuation.
Where the line spacing between close songs could cause confusion about whether or not they were different, spacing was added.
Some punctuation was altered or added to, or to near, the songs.
Thought break formatting indicates ellipsed text, as do ellipses within the songs.
On page 17, “St” was changed to “St.”.
Notably, on page 29, “row” was corrected to “raw”.
Variable diacritics, as with “Bohdan” and “Bohdàn”, were retained.
The author’s romanization/transliteration of Cyrillic script was retained as is; there are many variations in names and places.
Here are some illustrative examples of the many retained variations in names: “Drahomanov”, “Drahomaniv”, “Dragomanof”, “Drahomaniw”, and “Drahomanow”. “Chmielnitsky”, “Chmelnitsky”, and “Chmeilnitsky”. “Antonovich”, “Antonovitch”, “Antonovytch”, and “Antonowitch”.
“Moskow” and “Moscou” were silently standardized to “Moscow”.
“Moskovite” was standardized to “Moscovite”.
The words “vol.” and “vols.” were standardized to “Vol.” and “Vols.”.
Volume number was standardized to uppercase, i.e., “Vol. i” to “Vol. I”.
Periods and spaces were added to “ff”, “p”, “pp”, “vol”, and “vols” where missing and appropriate.
On page iv, “somtimes” was corrected to “sometimes”.
Chapters IV through X have letter section headings to organize and divide the poems. The higher division is in the form of “A.” and is always at a chapter division. The lower division is of the form “(a)”. The heading of Chapter VI was changed from “D.” to “(d)” to better reflect that division.
On page 35, the sentence that begins with “Terribly” was reformatted as a normal paragraph.
In the 9th footnote of Chapter VI, an aberrant quotation mark was removed.
In the 14th footnote of Chapter VI, “Drahomaow” was corrected to “Drahomanow”.
“Conclusion” was added to the chapter heading of Chapter XI to match the Table of Contents.
On page 65, the quotation that begins with “In” and ends with “properties” was presumed to be a single quotation, so some punctuation was removed. In the book, the punctuation was along a line break.
The Bibliography was partially standardized while maintaining its variable formatting style. Primarily, some of the punctuation was standardized; italicization was added to a title if partially missing, due to a line break or other cause; and italicization was removed, mainly from the English translation of a title whose transcription was already italicized.
On page 71, “Wondering” was corrected to “Wandering”.
On page 71, under “Chubinsky, Paul”, the page numbers “847” and “933” were exchanged so that the page numbers would increase in the list. The 3 numbers in the list should be accurate since their unifying feature in the referenced work is that they are folk songs collected by N. I. Kostomarov.
In the bibliography’s footnote, “appelations” was corrected to “appellations”.